Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Poll Thread: "The Patriot Act Should be..."
Free Republic ^ | 6-13-2005 | DTogo

Posted on 06/13/2005 10:21:02 AM PDT by DTogo

As recently suggested, here's a thread to allow FReepers to post (if they want to) how they voted on this poll, why, etc. Let's keep it civil! :)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Free Republic; Government; Miscellaneous; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: freerepublic; opinion; patriotact; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last
To: colorcountry

I voted permanent. I would be willing to vote expanded/extended in times of war. I just think that W.O.T. is here to stay.


21 posted on 06/13/2005 10:38:02 AM PDT by loborojo (What the hell is a "Reagan Democrat"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: loborojo
Permanent. If you are not doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to worry about.

I absolutely despise this line of reasoning.

With it, I can say: "If you are not doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't worry about warrantless searches."

With it, I can say: "If you are not doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't worry 24/7 automated surveillance."

With it, I can say: "If you are not doing anything wrong, then you shouldn't worry about financial privacy."

Your take on it is the antithesis of what this country should -- and used to -- stand for.

22 posted on 06/13/2005 10:38:56 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I voted to pull back. If we can't profile passengers on an airplane, then why should our citizens sacrifice any rights.


23 posted on 06/13/2005 10:39:50 AM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loborojo
I just think that W.O.T. is here to stay.

Exactly. And we have a rollback of our rights just temporarily, while this permanent war is carried out.

It's a police-state politician's wet dream.

24 posted on 06/13/2005 10:40:46 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
We have no option but to defend america and in doing so if we have to forgo some rights then so be it.

Utterly amazing.

Hitler would have loved a few million with your opinion.

Come to think of it, he did.

25 posted on 06/13/2005 10:43:07 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

A perfect recipe for tyranny. If FR is a good sampling of freedom loving people in the US, then our liberties are truly in joepardy.


26 posted on 06/13/2005 10:43:21 AM PDT by PaRebel (Self Defense: an unalienable right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
How is the patriot act defending us against Islamic terrorism.

Especially when our borders are not guarded.

27 posted on 06/13/2005 10:43:22 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (June 14 - Defeat DeWine - Vote Tom Brinkman for Congress (OH-2) - http://www.gobrinkman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

What? Actually follow the words of Washington instead of what passes for foreign policy now? I voted dump it. The patriot act is a slap in the face to anything the Framers would have intended


28 posted on 06/13/2005 10:43:55 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I also voted expanded. In addition to what DTogo wrote, I'd like to see something like:




We assist businesses in the USA, and allied nations, in proactively reengineering foreign operations and supply chain designs in order to avoid:

* Providing aid and comfort to the enemies of the USA and allies;

* Becoming dependent on markets and sources in nations that demonstrate a high likelihood of future anti-Allied aggression;

* Negative public relations owing to association with anti-Allied military aggression; and

* Interruptions in continuity of supply and operations due to embargos, seizures of facilities and assets by hostile entities, war between great powers, treason indictments and investigations affecting corporate officers and management, and any other disruptions of a geopolitical nature.


29 posted on 06/13/2005 10:44:32 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I thought this thread was to post your reason for voting one way or another, not slamming people for voting a certain way.


30 posted on 06/13/2005 10:45:30 AM PDT by loborojo (What the hell is a "Reagan Democrat"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

It was poorly named and as a result, became a target for American hating and fearing leftists. It should have just been called, "The anti-Terrorism Act".


31 posted on 06/13/2005 10:45:58 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I'm glad to see that there are still a few Freepers who are unwilling to let a Reichstag fire spook them into endorsing an overturning of the 1919 Weirmeir Republic Constitution.


32 posted on 06/13/2005 10:46:48 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
There's no footnote after the Bill of Rights that says "unless you want to catch a terrorist or a drug user."

I say repeal it.
33 posted on 06/13/2005 10:47:23 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loborojo
I thought this thread was to post your reason for voting one way or another, not slamming people for voting a certain way.

The thread is intended for discussion of the issue.

Your comments pertain to the issue, I am making my observations about those.

I note you don't defend your comments. That is wise.

34 posted on 06/13/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: loborojo

So perhaps you would support putting video cameras in everyones' homes and cars? I mean, if you aren't doing anything wrong, what's the problem?


35 posted on 06/13/2005 10:48:45 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I voted to drop it.

If the politicians/law enforcers would DO THEIR JOBS, it would cut back on quite a FEW terrorist minded cretins. The Patriot Act is going to be a VERY dangerous weapon in the hands of demoncraps.

36 posted on 06/13/2005 10:49:33 AM PDT by mommadooo3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

There's a book you would enjoy called "This Perfect Day". In it the populace were "innoculated" against diseases and during the "innoculation" process, were also prevented from having children, growing facial hair, having birth defects, acquiring any unusual or unique characteristics, thinking outside the box, needing freedom, nurturing creativity, experiencing weather changes, etc. It kind of follows this line of thinking. I think it's by Ira Levin....


37 posted on 06/13/2005 10:50:26 AM PDT by Hi Heels (Guns kill and cause crime? Dang, mine must be malfunctioning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
The Patriot Act is going to be a VERY dangerous weapon in the hands of demoncraps.

I don't think the Republic will survive it.

38 posted on 06/13/2005 10:50:30 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I voted drop it, it's anti-American. Giving up rights is a slippery slope that no American, who truly understands what this country was built on, should want to go down.


39 posted on 06/13/2005 10:50:38 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Everyone here who voted for extend it, expand it, or make it permanent need to ask themselves two things.

Do you trust John Kerry, Bill Klinton(who pushed for his own Patriot Act over the drug war), Janet Reno, Ted Kennedy, Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer, or Jimmy Carter with this power?

Do you trust mid level bureaucrats with this power?

40 posted on 06/13/2005 10:52:23 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (June 14 - Defeat DeWine - Vote Tom Brinkman for Congress (OH-2) - http://www.gobrinkman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson