Skip to comments.
Iraqi Insurgents Seek Talks With US
AFP via Arab News ^
| 2005 Jul 5
Posted on 07/04/2005 5:35:56 PM PDT by Wiz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Wiz
We will accept nothing but an official initiative from the US Congress with a precise timetable and a binding decision Okay, who put them on the fax list for the DNC talking points?
21
posted on
07/04/2005 5:47:06 PM PDT
by
aynrandfreak
(When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
To: kezekiel
I don't buy a single line of their crap They should be called Errorists rather than Terrorists. Never have so many been wrong about so much for so long.
22
posted on
07/04/2005 5:48:27 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: Spktyr
We've been burned badly by taking other courses of action in the past. Nothing but total, unconditional, absolute surrender should even be considered.Considering their tactics of prentending to surrender, I say anhillation of the terrorists (or what the MSM calls "insurgents") is the best course of action.
23
posted on
07/04/2005 5:48:57 PM PDT
by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: Wiz
Has anyone seen John Kerry?
24
posted on
07/04/2005 5:52:24 PM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: StuLongIsland
Kind of like the Democrats...
25
posted on
07/04/2005 5:53:43 PM PDT
by
Homer1
To: Wiz
All the terrorist loving radicals will come flocking to this...
Remember the negotiations, though with Arafat - Arafat would blatantly lie during the negotiations, renege on promises and kept moving his demands back. When the Islamoterrost says "negotiations" it doesn't have the same concept that a person who believes that one's word is worth anything would have.
And that is the rhetorical trap that the lefties will try to force us into.
26
posted on
07/04/2005 6:03:00 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("The story is true" - Dan Rather)
To: Wiz
We will accept nothing but an official initiative from the US Congress with a precise timetable and a binding decisionViet Nam, Paris peace talks, playing us for patsies while buying time.
Sorry, morons, you picked a fight with the wrong president, and our congress can't help you this time.
To: JLS
When the enemy asks for negotiations with Congress, it means they have identified the weak link of underminers in the US government. They may be exhausted too, but it shows they have listened to Durbin, Hagel, Pelosi, Reid etal. who I am sure are shocked, shocked that they enemy views them as the weak link.
_________________________________________________
If Terrorists would negotiate with Durbin, Hagel, Pelosi, Reid etal, that would be like negotiating with their own Political wing.
28
posted on
07/04/2005 7:10:36 PM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: Wiz
While they may well begetting exhausted, it would be a big mistake to validate them by recognizing them as a negotiating entity.
29
posted on
07/04/2005 7:15:52 PM PDT
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Wiz
An attempt to drive a wedge between a resolute President and a wavering Congress.
To: Wiz
Negotiation my a.s.......you can't negotiate with BEHEADING islamofacists, you ONLY made sure you KILL THEM ALL, NO MATTER HOW LONG IT TAKES!!!
31
posted on
07/04/2005 7:25:03 PM PDT
by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: Wiz
They seem to be asking for Kennedy's solution. They are desperate; he is treasonous.
32
posted on
07/04/2005 7:30:09 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(Freep and ye shall find.)
To: Wiz
Sure they want to deal with congress. They think congress is made up of guys like Durbin and Kennedy who they think are fools and cowards.
To: Wiz
Let's not have a sellout by members of Congress. A little more fighting and these "insurgents" will be a lot more reasonable.
To: Wiz
We do not negotiate with terrorists. We KILL terrorists.
That is all they need to know. Period!
35
posted on
07/04/2005 8:13:14 PM PDT
by
upchuck
("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Wiz
Ibrahim Yusef Al-Shammari
Clearly this man is getting the DNC talking points faxes.
36
posted on
07/04/2005 8:23:51 PM PDT
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: cripplecreek
Screw 'em. Hit them as harder than ever, 24 hours a day for a week. See what kind of negotiations they would like then. This appeal for negotiations is nothing but an insult and should be rewarded as such.
37
posted on
07/04/2005 9:04:20 PM PDT
by
jblair
To: Keith in Iowa
Excellent. When the other side says that they are willing to negotiate, that means that Z-Man is on his own. Lots of big talk and demands from the Sunnis, but all of a sudden the Al Qaeda are feeling awfully lonely right now.
The Sunnis want their cut of the oil money. They see the price of Saudi Light on the spot market. They want in on the action.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
38
posted on
07/04/2005 9:10:44 PM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: Pukin Dog
And you can bet that a Democrat delegation will meet with these folks, then return Or maybe they won't return at all. Hostages have been taken in that area; the latest being an Egyptian ambassador.
Picture Ted Kennedy or Dick Durbin being held captive by these terrorists. It'd be a crying shame, wouldn't it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson