Skip to comments.
Dead Boys Alive in Trunk for 17 Hours
FOXNews.com ^
| 7/19/2005
| Associated Press
Posted on 07/19/2005 9:34:10 AM PDT by AbeKrieger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: dirtboy
There were bad thunderstorms that night and they say that might have drowned out the calls for help. Still, I don't see how they didn't hear them. The rain didn't last that long. The trunk should have been searched right away.
21
posted on
07/19/2005 9:52:43 AM PDT
by
Cougar66
(The biggest trick the liberal media ever played was convincing the world it didn't exist)
To: rollo tomasi
The insurance policy for the police department will pay.
To: rollo tomasi
Cherry Hill, NJ (located in Camden County) will pay.
To: linkinpunk
Don't you think they bear some responsibility?Only if the parents also bear some responsibility since they also searched for three hours. This was a tragic accident ... the insertion of a lawyer only makes it more tragic.
24
posted on
07/19/2005 9:53:37 AM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: layman; All
I wonder if the parents will also sue the car manufacturer for not making a child-proof trunk.
To: AbeKrieger
Was the immigration status of these folks ever confirmed?
26
posted on
07/19/2005 9:55:57 AM PDT
by
ikka
To: linkinpunk
...insurance policy for the police department we will pay.
27
posted on
07/19/2005 9:56:05 AM PDT
by
RushCrush
(Hubba hubba hubba, Dooba Dooba Dooba!)
To: linkinpunk
Uh, since the police searched the car while the boys were alive in the trunk. And the police missed them. Don't you think they bear some responsibility? Spoken like a true welfare queen.
28
posted on
07/19/2005 9:56:38 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If the police officer failed to check his rear-view mirror and backed over the three boys, and killed them, would you still claim that he bears no responsibility?
To: linkinpunk
And the police missed them. Don't you think they bear some responsibility? So I guess what we're saying is if police do not check every possible lead, or shred of evidence, or possible hiding place, or nook and cranny, and some unfollowed path turns out to be the correct one, then they should be held criminally or financially negligent? I've seen many comments on this story where the "parent" says the children played in the trunk. 1) Are you kidding me? 2) Was this EVER mentioned in the presence of police before the bodies were found? If the cops did not have ALL the information, how could they be responsible?
30
posted on
07/19/2005 9:59:15 AM PDT
by
AbeKrieger
(Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
To: AbeKrieger
Villari told the newspaper that responsibility for the deaths is now "squarely on the shoulders of the police." Otherwise, the responsibility would rest on his clients: the parents.
To: RushCrush
The police should pay, insurance policy or not.
If a Microsoft security guard screwed up like this, would you feel the same?
Or are you just against this as a taxpayer?
To: Sunshine Sister
what about the OWNER of the inoperable car? where is his liability for allowing a nuisance /potential liability exposure tempting the children to crawl into vehicle. Where is the Parents personal responsibility if they searched that area why didn't they too check the car ? Lawyers are such maggots
To: linkinpunk
I'm against my insurance rates going up.
34
posted on
07/19/2005 10:01:30 AM PDT
by
RushCrush
(Hubba hubba hubba, Dooba Dooba Dooba!)
To: linkinpunk
If the police officer failed to check his rear-view mirror and backed over the three boys, and killed them, would you still claim that he bears no responsibility? You sure you are coherent? How do you compare one to the other. Keep on rambling.
35
posted on
07/19/2005 10:01:47 AM PDT
by
AbeKrieger
(Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
To: linkinpunk
Perhaps. . .but why didn't the parents look there! They are the one's with the car on their property and much like a refrigerator in the back yard, best to look their first.
Parent share a huge blame on this.
And why didn't the dogs alert on the car?
Dogs are to blame as well.
To: AbeKrieger
Oh sure blame the police because you are stupid. This sucks and has $$$$ written all over and under it - just a POS!!
37
posted on
07/19/2005 10:03:42 AM PDT
by
sandydipper
(Less government is best government!)
To: AbeKrieger
If the cops did not have ALL the information, how could they be responsible? "Sargent Jones, go search the car."
"I looked in the windows and everything looks fine. Can I get a dough nut now?"
If you told one of your officers to search the car, wouldn't you expect him to include the trunk?
Or would you say, "Ah, well. Close enough."
To: AbeKrieger
One example is negligence.
The other one is negligence.
(try some intelligence next time)
To: AbeKrieger
"The person who left the trunk open or otherwise accessible to children...100% responsible."Good point.Who owned the vehicle?I recall from bus law that there's a law that applies to minors(esp young children)getting injured or killed due to a homeowners negligence.EX a pool w/out a fence or some barrier to deny access.Homeowner can be liable(civily and criminally)if a minor wanders into the pool and drowns.Wouldn't this apply as well?Cannot for the life of me remember the legal term.Any ideas?
40
posted on
07/19/2005 10:07:22 AM PDT
by
Thombo2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson