Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not Getting It (Soros Funds Socialism On Campus)
NRO ^ | July 18, 2005 | Jason Mattera

Posted on 07/19/2005 11:47:16 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Frustrated by conservative activism on college campuses, the Left has unveiled secret weapons to counter our Ann Coulters and Ben Steins: Ashley Olsen and Oprah Winfrey. Keisha Senter, speakers' bureau coordinator for Campus Progress, introduced the group’s newest stars at its recent and first-ever national student conference.

Campus Progress, a project of billionaire George Soros’s Center for American Progress (CAP), seeks to “empower a new generation of progressive leaders.” Leftist organizers admit to being overwhelmed on the college front by groups such as the Young America’s Foundation, even though colleges and universities have been propagating liberalism for decades.

According to CAP’s former campus programs director Ben Hubbard, “A national effort to work with students on the substance, intellectual foundation, and communication of progressive ideas is needed.” With the realization that food-throwing doesn’t win debates, as was demonstrated by certain assailants of Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan, Bill Kristol, and David Horowitz earlier this academic year, leftists have finally organized a conference to discuss ideas — or so is their spin.

For the past 30 years on college campuses, the Left has been regurgitating concepts that do not work: socialist, pacifist, redistributionist…you get the tired old idea. Instead of injecting some fresh thinking into the young left-activist bloodstream, panelists at Campus Progress’s national student conference rehashed big-government policies, drew ridiculous parallels, and conveyed embarrassing talking points.

Moderator and former Clinton White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers asked a panel to define progressive values. Paul Begala, host of CNN’s Crossfire, told of the value of “progressive patriotism.” He graciously went on to elaborate using an analogy: “Cain said, ‘am I my brother’s keeper?’ ‘You bet your ass,’ God said.” Begala continued by saying that Republicans reject his celestial wisdom and instead come from the mindset: “I’m going to get mine — screw you!” Another panelist, Thomas Frank, the author of What’s the Matter with Kansas?, said progressive values are “freedom plus groceries.” Heather McGhee, economic-policy analyst with Demos — a left-wing public-policy group — said progressives value “shared prosperity.” Students seeking guidance were given socialist solutions, which are no longer charming — not even in Russia.

At universities, conservatives are no stranger to being called "Nazis." Thomas Frank decided to keep that spirit alive. According to him, “They [Republicans] didn’t have any problem with Hitler, other than the fact that they thought he rocked.”

One young progressive asked how to campaign in the suburbs. He was not given an answer, but a specious sound bite. It’s difficult to campaign in those areas, said Ruy Teixeira, author of The Emerging Democratic Majority. “They are not our base — the white married couples who moved away from the cities to get away from minorities and smog.”

David Halperin, senior adviser for Howard Dean’s presidential bid and the conference coordinator, bemoans the millions of dollars having been spent instigating conservative activism on college campuses. He told the Washington Post that “We’ve been on the defensive for 25 years.” Yet he and other liberals routinely miss the fact that groups such as Campus Progress are wholly unnecessary. The counterpart to organizations such as the Young America’s Foundation is the university itself.

Schools habitually offer courses in “ethnic studies,” “queer studies,” “gender studies” and have set up institutions such as multicultural student unions and women’s centers to spread liberalism under the rubric of tolerance and diversity. It’s a canard to say that liberalism is not embedded in the university, as Campus Progress purports. Schools don’t have courses on “Conservatism and American History” and surely would never invite Thomas Sowell or Clarence Thomas to speak at commencement, but have allowed Wesley Clark and Thomas Friedman.

It’s not the lack of resources, but the tactics used and ideas professed that cause student apathy toward progressive activism. The Left’s routine support for divisive concepts such as racial preferences, the banning of ROTC recruiters from campuses, and their widespread commitment to enforcing political correctness will keep them as second-rate activists. Soros’s millions will not help.

Liberals had their chance at this conference to discuss something original. Unfortunately, they took the occasion to cast aspersions on conservatism with empty, dubious, and hateful rhetoric.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communist; fundingtheleft; leftismoncampus; schooltakeover; soros; yaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Know your enemy.
1 posted on 07/19/2005 11:47:17 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Thomas Frank decided to keep that spirit alive. According to him, “They [Republicans] didn’t have any problem with Hitler, other than the fact that they thought he rocked.”

What an idiot. I can't name a single Republican who would say Hitler "rocked" or was anything but an evil man.

2 posted on 07/19/2005 11:51:11 AM PDT by RockinRight (Democrats - Trying to make an a$$ out of America since 1933)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

This needs wide circulation. Will be circulating to non-freeper friends.


3 posted on 07/19/2005 11:57:58 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I don't know why they feel that they STILL have to compare America and her advocates to Nazi Germany and Hitler. But I do know: it's easy, so easy that any old body can do it. It did serve a purpose among "progressives" (CPUSA) during the reign of Stalin to justify the Soviets' actions, to be sure. This is going back to shortly after WWII, IRCC.

"Progressive patriotism?" All I've seen is globalist, international socialism. Is this a new thing?
4 posted on 07/19/2005 11:58:28 AM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: RockinRight

Well, when you don't have truth on your side, what is "left" except lies, lies and more lies?


6 posted on 07/19/2005 12:01:25 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I recall seeing Thomas Frank's appearance on the Charlie Rose show sometime last year. He was one of the most insufferably condescending jackasses I've seen in my life. The entire premise for his book is that midwesterners are rubes who have been fooled into voting Republican, despite it being against their best interest. He repeatedly insulted the intelligence of every middle American who voted Republican, and was so arrogant and dismissive of their concerns as to not see one legitimate reason for their position.


7 posted on 07/19/2005 12:02:29 PM PDT by clearlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
According to CAP’s former campus programs director Ben Hubbard, “A national effort to work with students on the substance, intellectual foundation, and communication of progressive ideas is needed.”

Translation: this venture is doomed to failure.

And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

Mt 7:26-27 KJV

8 posted on 07/19/2005 12:10:50 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Dog

If we organize it, they will come! Ready, set, GO!


9 posted on 07/19/2005 12:16:34 PM PDT by Snapping Turtle (Snap on and don't let go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The Long March Through The Institutions, unleashed 1920 - 1970, on the campuses, created the strains of Western radicalism we see today. Soros knows what he's doing. If he is persistent, he can pull off a repeat of the previous success.


10 posted on 07/19/2005 12:17:03 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Is there such a thing as throwing bad money after bad..?

Lots of scam artists on the left will be firing the bongs from this fund.

What a joke, just keep a straight face, if you can... And hope the nitwit keeps feeding the fire in the bong.
11 posted on 07/19/2005 12:18:43 PM PDT by mmercier (Kick it in beitch, it is free and we all get high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Unfortunately, Soros The Enemy, belongs to the same club as many we like to think of as friends.

Same club as Cheney, Rice, G.H.W. Bush and a host of others.

They have plans for us.


12 posted on 07/19/2005 12:41:44 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Velveeta; DAVEY CROCKETT; MamaDearest; WestCoastGal; Pepper777; familyop; Tuba Guy; ...

Ping

http://www.google.com/search?client=googlet&q=CFR%20North%20American%0D%0ACommunity


13 posted on 07/19/2005 1:02:18 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp Meet YOUR Communist party members in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Unfortunately, Soros The Enemy, belongs to the same club as many we like to think of as friends. Same club as Cheney, Rice, G.H.W. Bush and a host of others. They have plans for us.

The lefties will find that out also. Soros made a fortune on currency speculationm, then decided to be against it when others tried to follow suit. He's an opportunist - you don't get to be that rich being altruistic. He's got a scam going...

Arnold and Maria vacationed with Kerry and Teresa this past winter.. Party affiliation is meaningless, the rich always close ranks in their own interests. Libs seem hopelessly naive on this point..

14 posted on 07/19/2005 1:04:02 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: podkane

So do pubs.


15 posted on 07/19/2005 1:08:34 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The vast majority of conservatives have not only rejected Hitler but will happily keep rejecting him and won't even try to defend Nazi Germany. I'm still waiting for the liberals to show the same sort of reaction to Stalin or Mao and their "worker's paradises" given all the innocent people those two leftist heroes murdered (more than Hitler).
16 posted on 07/19/2005 1:08:59 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

Leftists reject Hitler, out of all the other socialist mass murdering monsters, because he lost.

Notice nobody talks about Al Gore any more?
Because he's a loser.


Now, why would a conservative not utterly reject that madman?

Are you trying to link that socialist with conservatism?

Or are you just a victim of government school edjakashin?


17 posted on 07/19/2005 1:35:53 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
My point is not that Hitler was conservative, though I do think the fascists adopted some conservative elements which to differentiate them from the other socialists (e.g., patriotism, traditional culture, and family values). No conservative is going to come to the defense of Hitler. It doesn't really matter why. The main point is that liberals still come to the defense of Stalin and Mao, who were just as bad.
18 posted on 07/19/2005 1:41:29 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

Hitler, the socialist, supplanted the conservative Von Hindenburg.

There's nothing conservative about the national socialist workers party.

That's just leftist revisionism.
The Nazis were green, vegan, anti-smoking, animal rights, queeer socialists, just like the agitators of the left today.

They differentiated themselves from the glassy eyed dimwit commies (World Socialist Workers Party)
because of their connection to Russia and number of jews in the communist party.

The changing of a single word does not move one across the entire ideolgical spectrum.

Hitler was no closer to conservativism than Jefferson is to the modern democrat party.


19 posted on 07/19/2005 1:51:36 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

...My point is not that Hitler was conservative...

Oh, jeez, I missed that "NOT".

I'm Sorry.

Guess I wrote all that for nothing.

Well maybe someone else will see it and learn something.


20 posted on 07/19/2005 1:54:14 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson