John Kerry on Roberts Nomination

Press Release ^ | 7/19/05

[Smartass]

Hanoi John...WHO

[Trajan88]

Hey Johnny... does November 2004 still hurt?

Maybe you should rub some Windex on it.

[nopardons]

If only Kerry would STFU!

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

Spineless US Senate would rather protect Hanoi Kerry
than deal with the anti war crowd.

Anyone who thinks Hanoi Kerry isn't behind the anti war crowd needs to get a clue.

It's time to support our troops and ignore the jelly fish in the US Senate!

There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate

He is there illegally!

WAKEUP AMERICA!

For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

Why is Kerry still in the US Senate?
This is in violation of
U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html

And the FBI has proof of his treason.

Hanoi Kerry Timeline of a traitor
includes FBI files

May 1970
Kerry and Julia traveled to Paris, France and met with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam (PRG), the political wing of the Vietcong, and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a "fact-finding" mission.

(U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.)

http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html

a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war,
or with any offense punishable by death,
may be tried at any time without limitation.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm#*%20843.%20ART.%2043.%20STATUTE%20OF%20LIMITATIONS

Distribute these url's!

Links to Anti Kerry sites
212 LINKS
News reports,
Viper's Vietnam Veterans Page

http://members.aol.com/ga1449ga/links/links.html


EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!

MUST SEE WEBSITE!!!!

http://www.kerrystreason.com/index.html

Full details on these url's!

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

Did you see this...?
(The 'Kerry's Promise Counter')
http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=6628
Polipundit even tells you how to install it on your own page!

Swift Boat Veteran For Truth John O'Neill Comments on Kerry's 180 'Release'
6/7/05
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418592/posts

John Kerry was dishonorably dismissed from the Navy:
(statement from lawyers there at the time)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1406760/posts

Why does Hanoi Kerry continue to refuse to sign
form SF 180 and release his military records to the public?
Sam Sewell 09 June 2005

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article4388.html

[Smartass]

THEN: Democrats Said Judicial Nominees Should Get A Vote

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA): “Mr. President, this is not the way to run the U.S. Senate. Let’s allow this woman’s name to be placed on the floor and then those who have any objection can express their objections and vote no.” (Sen. Barbara Boxer, Congressional Record, 5/14/97, p. S4420)

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA): “According to the U.S. Constitution, the President nominates, and the Senate shall provide advice and consent. It is not the role of the Senate to obstruct the process and prevent numbers of highly qualified nominees from even being given the opportunity for a vote on the Senate floor.” (Sen. Barbara Boxer, Congressional Record, 5/14/97, p. S4420)

Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-MD): “It is worse than that. It is not whether you let the President have his nominees confirmed. You will not even let them be considered by the Senate for an up-or-down vote. That is the problem today. In other words, the other side will not let the process work so these nominees can come before the Senate for judgment.” (Sen. Paul Sarbanes, Congressional Record, 3/19/97, p. S2539)

Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE): “But I also respectfully suggest that everyone who is nominated is entitled to have a shot, to have a hearing and to have a shot to be heard on the floor and have a vote on the floor.” (Sen. Joe Biden, Congressional Record, 3/19/97, p. S2540)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA): “Mr. President, the time has come to act on these nominations. I’m not asking for a rubber stamp; let’s hold hearings on those nominees who haven’t had them, and vote on all of them, up or down, yes or no.” (Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Congressional Record, 5/14/97, p. S4425)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA): “I think what we on this side are encountering is the holding up of judges … for years on end. That must stop. A nominee is entitled to a vote. Vote them up; vote them down.” (Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Congressional Record, 9/16/99, p. S11014)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “Nominees deserve a vote. … The President and the Senate do not always agree. But we should resolve these disagreements by voting on these nominees--yes or no.” (Sen. Ted Kennedy, Congressional Record, 1/28/98, p. S85)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “What we are witnessing today is a direct assault on the President’s constitutional power to nominate and appoint judges.” (Sen. Ted Kennedy, Congressional Record, 5/14/97, p. S4426)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “When the Founders wrote the Constitution and gave the Senate the power of advice and consent on Presidential nominations , they never intended the Senate to work against the President, as this Senate is doing, by engaging in a wholesale stall and refusing to act on large numbers of the President's nominees.” (Sen. Ted Kennedy, Congressional Record, 9/21/99, S11102)

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV): “They are simply holding up the President’s appointees because they don’t want them to be selected, or they have some other issue and they are trying to hold the nominee hostage.” (Sen. Harry Reid, Congressional Record, 4/22/97, p. S3398)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “That is what the Constitution speaks of in our advise and consent capacity. … Vote them up, vote them down.” (Sen. Patrick Leahy, Congressional Record, 9/21/99, p. S11102)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “[E]arlier this year … I noted how improper it would be to filibuster a judicial nomination.” (Sen. Patrick Leahy, Congressional Record, 10/14/98, p. S12578)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “To delay judicial nominations for months and years and to deny them a vote is wrong.” (Sen. Patrick Leahy, Congressional Record, 10/14/98, p. S12578)

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL): “If, after 150 days languishing in a committee there is no report on an individual, the name should come to the floor. If, after 150 days languishing on the Executive Calendar that name has not been called for a vote, it should be. Vote the person up or down. They are qualified or they are not.” (Sen. Dick Durbin, Congressional Record, 9/28/98, p. S S11031)

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY): “I also plead with my colleagues to move judges with alacrity--vote them up or down. But this delay makes a mockery of the Constitution, makes a mockery of the fact that we are here working, and makes a mockery of the lives of very sincere people who have put themselves forward to be judges and then they hang out there in limbo.” (Sen. Chuck Schumer, Congressional Record, 3/7/00, p. S1211)

NOW: Democrats Filibuster President Bush’s Judicial Nominations

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “This chapter in the effort of our Republican friends of the judicial nominations has ended with these hours of filibuster. But what has not ended is the resolution and the determination of the members of the United States Senate to continue to resist any Neanderthal that is nominated by this president of the United States for any court -- federal court in the United States.” (CNN’s “Inside Politics,” 11/14/03)

Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT): “So bottom line, circumstances changed, and my opinion about the supermajority change[d].” (Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Press Conference, 4/20/05)

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA): “So we’re saying we think you ought to get nine votes over the 51 required. That isn’t too much to ask for such a super important position. There ought to be a super vote. Don’t you think so?” (Sen. Barbara Boxer, Remarks At MoveOn.org Rally, Washington, D.C., 3/16/05)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “If we have to exercise all our rights in order to protect them, so be it…” (Jennifer A. Dlouhy, “No Letup In Judiciary Wars As Party-Line Vote Advances Disputed Estrada Nomination,” Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 2/1/03)

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY): “The President’s 20 renominees ‘are out of the mainstream and will not be confirmed.’” (Editorial, “Advice And Consent,” The San Diego Union-Tribune, 2/16/05)

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY): “‘The nominees we have opposed are so far out of the mainstream that they deserved to be rejected before and they deserve to be rejected again.” (Gary Martin, “Senate Showdown Looms On Judges,” San Antonio Express-News, 4/22/05)

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV): “What we have to keep in mind is that we, the legislative branch of Government, are separate but equal. That is what checks and balances are all about. The President should not have, from the Senate, a rubberstamp for everything he wants.” (Sen. Harry Reid, Congressional Record, 4/21/04, S4043)

[devolve]

I voted for it!

ARMOR FOR IRAQ?

Before I voted against it!

[Slings and Arrows]

Who's John Kerry?

He served in Vietnam or somewhere.

On which side?

[PhilDragoo]

[devolve]

?

?

GREAT PRETENDER

[weegee]

Short answer... "Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

Someone call a waambulance.

[BamaAndy]

I'm mighty glad you're not on the court, Kerry. Being no Sandra Day O'Conner is a good thing, you plastic twerp.

[jslade]

I believe he served in Vietnam!

Yeah. For 3 months before he cut and ran.

[SeaBiscuit]

"NOT FORTHCOMING WITH INFORMATION."

LOL Kerry's talking about himself again.

[beyond the sea]

There's too much at stake to do anything less."

Kerry should be at a stake....... burning at a stake.

[truemiester]

I'm sorry.... John who?? Oh, yes, the PX (NEX) hero.

[truemiester]

If you listen closely this is the same thing (more or less) that McCain said!

[the invisib1e hand]

why do i torment myself by reading this drivel?

[hershey]

Kerry. Who he?

[DM1]

"I detest this guy."
Brother, you are NOT the only one!

[LS]

Well, Morris the Liberal Negro on Fox was already saying they should filibuster if even one senator isn't satisfied.