Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2005 7:24:33 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: conserv13

Oh great!


2 posted on 08/04/2005 7:24:59 AM PDT by Dolphan (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Roberts hit piece.


3 posted on 08/04/2005 7:25:22 AM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

He also worked for Democrats. What does it matter?


4 posted on 08/04/2005 7:25:55 AM PDT by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Pro-Bono the gay lobby is one of the richest groups in the country. why Pro-bono?


6 posted on 08/04/2005 7:27:46 AM PDT by since1868
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

All Roberts may have done is to assist, perhaps answer a few questions, a co-worker. Standard in any Law office!


7 posted on 08/04/2005 7:29:11 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
his legal expertise helped them persuade the Supreme Court to issue a landmark 1996 ruling protecting people against discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

And the problem is.....?

8 posted on 08/04/2005 7:29:14 AM PDT by syriacus (Embryos -- Special enough that researchers want a lot of them; not special enough to deserve to live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
Posted twice already.


10 posted on 08/04/2005 7:30:13 AM PDT by TheBigB (Never insult seven men if you're only holding a six-gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Oh no. Someone with his stature wouldn't have to take on a pro-bono project like this unless he wanted to. Damn.


11 posted on 08/04/2005 7:32:54 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
It's irrelevant.
14 posted on 08/04/2005 7:36:38 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

23 posted on 08/04/2005 7:44:03 AM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

As I posted on another thread about this:

I see from a number of the posts on this thread that the left's smear tactic campaign is working.

Has anybody asked him why he did it? Has anybody done research on the case? Maybe there was some actual discrimination going on, above and beyond what the homos usually complain about? Has anybody asked him if he thought it was a mistake?

You people sure are quick to act on this, aren't you.


27 posted on 08/04/2005 7:47:28 AM PDT by jtminton (Help stop second hand rap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer

*


32 posted on 08/04/2005 7:50:07 AM PDT by biblewonk (They are not gods which are made with hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Divide and Conquer


36 posted on 08/04/2005 7:50:58 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Lawyers don't take only cases they're ideologically aligned with. This means nothing.


38 posted on 08/04/2005 7:51:55 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

SPLAT!!!!1

Another fishing expedition?

Do you think that any of this will stick?

43 posted on 08/04/2005 7:52:39 AM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

One of several articles about John Roberts' pro bono work on behalf of "gay" rights activist clients. I'll find one or two more representative articles just so you can figure out what it all means.

What it means to me is that (most, not all, not all) lawyers are similar to prostitutes. Here's a man who, it seems obvious to me, is a very moral, upright, right thinking man. But, when he worked in a law office, he had to do his master's bidding. He worked, he earned money, he did what he was told. Unless he volunteered for this particular case because he thought it was such a good cause...

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


48 posted on 08/04/2005 7:56:35 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13; All

Has anybody stopped to consider that this all happened 10 years ago? How many people here would stand by everything they did ten years ago?

Get a grip, folks.


69 posted on 08/04/2005 8:05:06 AM PDT by jtminton (Help stop second hand rap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13
his legal expertise helped them persuade the Supreme Court to issue a landmark 1996 ruling protecting people against discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

He supervised the appellate division at Hogan and Hartson at the time. He probably had an obligation to the firm to check the briefs for sound law.

110 posted on 08/04/2005 8:22:44 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Aren't his children adopted?


263 posted on 08/04/2005 5:15:02 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conserv13

Roberts in a synonym for Souter.


275 posted on 08/04/2005 7:17:58 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson