Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Mohammed Atta Overlooked?
TIME ^ | Sunday, Aug. 14, 2005 | BRIAN BENNETT, TIMOTHY J. BURGER AND DOUGLAS WALLER

Posted on 08/14/2005 11:22:47 AM PDT by george76

New questions about whether the U.S. had information about the 9/11 mastermind years before the attacks

Just how damning are allegations by Congressman Curt Weldon that a secret Pentagon intelligence operation pegged hijacker Mohammed Atta as a threat nearly two years before he led the 9/11 attacks? When Weldon first made the charge in a new book and in a June speech on the House floor, it met with little attention, but perhaps due to the August heat or the approaching fourth anniversary of the attacks, the accusation ignited controversy last week.

The question is whether it has any substance. Weldon says a data-mining exercise, called Able Danger, spotted Atta and other hijackers in 1999, but Pentagon lawyers in September 2000 blocked officials running the program from handing the tip to the FBI.

Weldon’s further allegation that the 9/11 commission was alerted to the alleged oversight but ignored it prompted the defunct panel to conduct an investigation last week before issuing a statement late Friday saying members had received only an 11th-hour mention of Atta that “was not sufficiently reliable to warrant revision of the report or further investigation.”

Meanwhile, at Weldon’s request, House intelligence committee chairman Peter Hoekstra told TIME he is investigating the matter...

Pentagon officials are playing down any controversy. They say they can find nothing produced by the Able Danger program...

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; 911hijackers; atta; balkanalqaeda; timemag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2005 11:22:47 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Anonymous sources say, "Able Danger, who he?".


2 posted on 08/14/2005 11:24:51 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Overlooked?? Hardly. He was deliberately ignored...


3 posted on 08/14/2005 11:24:56 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Pulizer prize awaiting the first leftist carreer "journalist" that wants to sneak behind their editors desk.


4 posted on 08/14/2005 11:26:05 AM PDT by samadams2000 (Pitchforks and Lanterns..with a smiley face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76
"They say they can find nothing produced by the Able Danger program..."

Have they looked in Sandy Burgalar's pants?

5 posted on 08/14/2005 11:26:25 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
When Weldon first made the charge in a new book and in a June speech on the House floor, it met with little attention,

Why not explain this little detail further, TIME?

6 posted on 08/14/2005 11:26:47 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

spin/obfuscation cycle about to go into full gear.


7 posted on 08/14/2005 11:28:06 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (see my FR page for a link to the tribute to Terri Schaivo, a short video presentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Well, maybe they wrote this before the Commission's latest report and 4 page apologia. Weldon may be wrong, but Captain's Quarters blog is right, there's a lot of 'splainin for them to do before this is over.


8 posted on 08/14/2005 11:29:17 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

Not one word about the "wall" imposed by Jamie Gorelick and the Clinton Administration. The MSM continues its practice of telling only half the story - the half that makes the Demo-RATS scapegoat de jour look bad, either the Department of Defense or the Bush Administration.


9 posted on 08/14/2005 11:31:07 AM PDT by KAUAIBOUND (Hawaii - paradise infected with left-wing cockroaches and centipedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KAUAIBOUND

Exactly. It's not even about Mohammad Atta specifically.

If the whole program was examined and it's results could have been passed to the FBI, then we may have prevented the attack. So why didn't the 9/11 Commission tell us?

JAMIE GORELICK


10 posted on 08/14/2005 11:37:36 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: george76
Here's part of the spin in this story. It says that "the Able Danger program,... involved fewer than half a dozen intelligence analysts...." Given how Able Danger was conducted, it could have been done by one computer geek and an unlimited supply of pizza and coffee.

Time does not bother to explain how Able Danger was conducted. So, I will:

The researchers in this project never had to leave their cubicles. They gathered "open source" information, meaning publicly available speeches, articles, broadcasts, from many nations and in many languages. They entered all this data into a huge computer (perhaps a Cray), and asked the computer to identify and quantify all connections between data points.

The results of this were the identification of five of the hijackers (including the 20th one, who was prevented from entering the US at a Florida airport) and the identification of several cells, including one in Brooklyn and one in Hamburg (where we now know the main planning for 9/11 took place).

For anyone in the military to dismiss the value of this breakthrough analysis is as stupid as the Army Air Corps officers who court-martialed Billy Mitchell for his assertions that air power would become essential in warfare. It is as dumb as the Secretary of the Army who referred in his 1933 annual report to "the tried and proven horse."

It is impossible to tell from this Time magazine story whether the three writers had a clue of what Able Danger did, and how it did it. It is clear that they were predisposed to reject this as an important story.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The 9/11 9/11 Commission" (Not a Misprint)

11 posted on 08/14/2005 11:43:29 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

12 posted on 08/14/2005 11:44:05 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

Posted by Peach to george76
On News/Activism 08/14/2005 2:15:42 PM EDT · 25 of 37


This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer.

Has anyone heard Weldon or anyone else state that Able Danger can place Atta in Prague? If we can do this, it will virtually kill the left and their mantra that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/05226/553271.stm



13 posted on 08/14/2005 11:47:48 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
"Overlooked?"

No. Mohammad Atta was being protected by people at the highest levels of power.

And, wouldn't you know, it all happened at the same time the Chinese were stealing the plans for the W88 nuclear warhead and buying off the Leftist swine, Billy Boy Clinton.

14 posted on 08/14/2005 12:03:16 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Is it time to start the Gore-licker death count.

Who knew that Clinton's China Gate scandal would blowback into the hobbling of our national defense to the extent that it did. What other type of administration would even think to block off cooperation between the FBI and the CIA?

Carter may have enabled Islamofascism in Iran, but Clinton put a knife into the backs of the American people.

I used to find Michael Savage a little over the top, but he has been so right on talking about the leftists lawyers hobbling this country, partucularly Jamie Gorelicker, WHO WAS ABLE TO REMAIN ON THE 911 COMMISSION, even though she was a bad actor in the events that led up to it.


15 posted on 08/14/2005 12:04:22 PM PDT by LA Conservative (Peace Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

To: Peach

"This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer..."

You have an excellent point.

I enjoy your comments.

I will continue to look deeper into this to find more information, as we all are.


34 posted on 08/14/2005 11:36:51 AM PDT by george76




To: george76

Thank, George.

I hope that newspaper wasn't expanding on Weldon's assertion that Able Danger had tracked Atta and knew he wsa part of the Brooklyn cell.

I'm trying to find out if anyone has heard Weldon or read in his book that Able Danger is able to place Atta in Prague meeting with an Iraqi goverment official in April 2001.

35 posted on 08/14/2005 11:41:08 AM PDT by Peach


I have not read the book nor heard any verbal discussion that you mention. If I find something related, I will post it.

This is copied from the other postings that you mentioned.


16 posted on 08/14/2005 12:04:47 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: george76
Does anyone know where Atta stayed during his several visits to Boston?
17 posted on 08/14/2005 12:04:56 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
When Weldon first made the charge in a new book and in a June speech on the House floor, it met with little attention, but perhaps due to the August heat or the approaching fourth anniversary of the attacks, the accusation ignited controversy last week.

Too cute by half, clumsy Olds Media spin trying to make Able Danger little more than a summer flash in the pan. The most green cub reporter knows that Weldon took this story public for the good of our nation because of beltway bureaucratic indifference to the lessons of Able Danger.
18 posted on 08/14/2005 12:06:29 PM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
A senior Pentagon official briefed on the program told TIME, “This is much ado about nothing.” a source close to the former 9/11 commission aides who chased down the story last week said they had been led to believe the Pentagon would issue a statement along these lines on Friday. But as of Sunday, this had not occurred.

Now we know why the Sunday talk shows downplayed AD, e.g., Krauthammer, Kristol, Wallace, etc.

19 posted on 08/14/2005 12:07:58 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Some commentators have said that the Commission rejected the report because it didn't fit a pre-set timeline and connected this to its too easy dismissal of the Atta in Prague report. Kelly's statement, not sources, may be a sloppy iteration of this argument. If it isn't--if there is in fact Able Danger corroboration of that trip--the Commission Report is toilet paper.


20 posted on 08/14/2005 12:17:24 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson