Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

While Editors Ponder...(Free Republic did it)
OpinionEditorials.com ^ | August 16, 2005 | Robin Mullins Boyd

Posted on 08/16/2005 7:11:59 AM PDT by Chickenhawk Warmonger

The New York Times ran an article on August 15, 2005 that was an eye opening discourse into the soul of the print media. The article, “Editors Ponder how to Present a Broad Picture of Iraq”, was spurred by an anonymous email that has been making the rounds since January 2005. The email was basically a list of many of the accomplishments that had taken place in post Saddam Iraq. A number of editors of major newspapers, all Associated Press members, had concerns that they where “not telling the whole story” about Iraq.

Mike Silverman, managing editor of the Associated Press, lamented the fact that “explosions and shootings and fatalities and injuries on some days seem to dominate the news.” Silverman cited the dangers in Iraq as one of the reasons reporters were not getting more of the good things. Kathleen Carroll, the AP’s Executive Editor, actually said that “it was much easier to add up the number of dead than to determine how many hospitals received power on a particular day or how many schools were built.” Silverman than threw out the typical media excuse – the positives listed in the email were actually in various AP stories but they were buried in the articles.

Well here’s a news flash for the editors cited in the article. The email that started the ball rolling was actually excerpts from an article published on the Internet on January 30, 2005. The article, “Accentuating the Negative”, was published on OpinionEditorials.com. How did I get all of this information about the original article? Easy – I wrote it.

Yes, the major print media was thrown into fits of “healthy discussion” by a woman who lives in Guyton, GA. A southern belle, wife, mother and grandmother that works full time as a Registered Nurse. A writer that has no degree in journalism but writes op-ed pieces for free (but would not mind getting paid). A woman who loves to write and has book number 2 in production with a publisher. I am just someone that seeks out the facts and doesn’t rely on what someone tells me. Someone that can form an opinion all by their little self. I put my critical thinking skills developed through years of nursing to work.

Believe it or not, a dreaded “FReeper” and member of the Pajamahadeen knows more about the situation in Iraq than all of the high paid, high powered editors that rule what we read every day. I have no connections, no anonymous sources. Ramsey Clark did not have to set up interviews for me. I do not have an account at Kinko’s or access to forged memo templates. No one got “outed” in my attempt to uncover the truth. Lives were not placed in jeopardy. Not one single animal was harmed in my quest for information. No one was forced to wear panties on their head or participate in naked pyramids. Heck, I didn’t even have to give money to “the other side” in Fallujah to get the low-down.

In an ironic twist, a follow-up article, "Ignoring the Positive", was published on opinioneditorials.com the very same day. I did not have to be stationed in Baghdad or embedded with troops in Fallujah to get my information. No one was firing RPG’s at me. The only injury I sustained was a paper cut while printing out my rough draft of the article. The information for both articles came the War on Terror section of the Department of Defense website - information that anyone with Internet access can get any time of the day. Guess that blows Mr. Silverman’s excuse out of the water.

Am I surprised that the print media executives were clueless about the reconstruction facts in Iraq? Not hardly. Was the information more difficult to obtain than tallying up the dead and injured in Iraq? Uh, no. Any one with any amount of common sense knows the truth. Things are not all peaches and cream in Iraq but they certainly are not all black as the media would have us believe. So the next time one of the media pundits laments the difficulty obtaining positive information from Iraq, consider the source. The only difficulty the media has is setting aside their hatred of President Bush long enough to do their job. And they wonder why the newspaper circulation numbers are down across the board? Guess it’s easier to tally up the numbers than find out the truth.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ap; bushhaters; freepers; georgia; mediadummies; moonbats; pajamahadeen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
Spread the word - the pajamahadeen and FReepers rule. Once again the media proves how irrelevant they are... God Bless Our Soldiers, our President and our Country.
1 posted on 08/16/2005 7:11:59 AM PDT by Chickenhawk Warmonger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger; SittinYonder

Woohoo fellow Georgian!!

Good job stirring the pot like that!

Now you'll need to set up an alternate account so you can still post anonymously here on FR (hint hint)

I'm going to ping the GA board now.


2 posted on 08/16/2005 7:14:54 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Refill with only real Kikkoman Soy Sauce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

bump


3 posted on 08/16/2005 7:15:11 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

A great big AMEN to that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 08/16/2005 7:16:45 AM PDT by standing united (82nd ABN 1/508th BN Bco 1st Sqd. Alpha Fireteam Leader: "fury from the sky" 8-Duce on the Loose!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Just keep writing articles like these. Then send ABC, CBS, NBC, NY Times and the like the bill for doing their work.


5 posted on 08/16/2005 7:26:58 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Great piece!


6 posted on 08/16/2005 7:29:06 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
Thank you, Hawk (deadeye :) ...We all "feel" the LMSM Print Editors' "pain" /s off.

I hope your "papercut" is better. :D

7 posted on 08/16/2005 7:29:08 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Very nice. And thank you for doing it.


8 posted on 08/16/2005 7:29:25 AM PDT by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

bttt


9 posted on 08/16/2005 7:30:33 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Bravo.


10 posted on 08/16/2005 7:35:55 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Bulls-eye!

While reading your post, I had one of those moments where you pound the table and think, "THATS what I am trying to say!" I just wish I had the talents to say it as well as you.

When I realized that that the Mediacrats were telling me that I was too stupid to make an informed decision or even collect the facts, I became rather angry.

I think I will go out and cancel my fishwrappper, er...newspaper.


11 posted on 08/16/2005 7:55:51 AM PDT by coldoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Bravo! bump.


12 posted on 08/16/2005 7:57:02 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coldoc

You still subscribe? Haven't had a newspaper in this house for years, not since joining FR.


13 posted on 08/16/2005 8:04:58 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
Pajamahadeen

What a stupid word.  We're at war with the culture and religion from whence this word has "cleverly" been derived.

Why any FReeper uses it is beyond me.

I hardly think any one here would use the word "Pajamastapo" or the phrase "FReeper Rouge" in any context other than a direct insult.

I suppose it's petty of me to nit-pick it, but it annoys me every time I see it because it's not the least bit flattering.

14 posted on 08/16/2005 8:08:28 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Every evil which liberals imagine Judaism and Christianity to be, islam is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

If the opportunity ever presents itself, will you marry me?


15 posted on 08/16/2005 8:09:46 AM PDT by hiramknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
Pajamahadeen, what a stupid word

Yes, but it does say "up yours" to the MSM nicely.

16 posted on 08/16/2005 8:11:49 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger; Old Sarge

BTTT!! You rock lady!!

Good stuff ping!


17 posted on 08/16/2005 8:13:49 AM PDT by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny; Chickenhawk Warmonger

I happen to think Pajamhadeen is quite funny and I snicker every time I see it. So I guess that evens it out.


18 posted on 08/16/2005 8:15:56 AM PDT by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Mentioned on-air (Rush, Hannity as well I think) yesterday.

Rush thanked the Freepers specifically.


19 posted on 08/16/2005 8:17:32 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Maybe the AJC will print your article.

I won't hold my breath.

Job well done to a fellow Georgian.


20 posted on 08/16/2005 8:22:41 AM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson