Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling says gas stations liable
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 8/22/5 | JAMIE SATTERFIELD

Posted on 08/22/2005 12:29:51 PM PDT by SmithL

Selling gas to a drunk could make store owners legally responsible for injuries suffered if the intoxicated motorist causes a crash, the state Supreme Court has ruled.

The groundbreaking ruling comes in a Knoxville lawsuit that sought to extend the state's negligence laws, long applied to those who hawk alcohol to drunks, to those who provide them gas.

In the case, Gary L. West and Michell B. Richardson suffered severe injuries in July 2000 when their vehicle was struck head-on by drunk driver Brian Lee Tarver, 49, in a crash on Rutledge Pike.

Tarver later pleaded guilty to charges including vehicular assault and second-offense driving under the influence.

Attorneys Gregory F. Coleman and Michael A. Myers later filed a lawsuit in Knox County Circuit Court, alleging that Tarver's car never would have made it to its tragic collision with West and Richardson but for the $3 worth of gas he bought at an Exxon station on Rutledge Pike just before the crash.

More importantly, the attorneys alleged, employees at the Exxon, owned by East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co., knew Tarver was drunk - so drunk that a cashier refused to sell him beer.

The question for the state's high court was whether Pioneer could be held liable for the crash. Could or should its employees have foreseen the risk of a crash and, if so, was there something they could have done to try to prevent it?

While the high court made clear that the store's employees were not required to take affirmative action to stop Tarver from driving, they still could have refused to sell him gas, the court ruled.

"A safer alternative was readily available and easily feasible - simply refusing to sell gasoline to an obviously intoxicated driver," the court ruled in an opinion delivered by Justice William M. Barker.

According to court records, the cashier was facing a long line of customers when Tarver "pushed his way to the front of the line and asked the clerk if she would 'go get (him) some beer.' "

He reeked of alcohol and staggered when he walked, court records stated. Believing Tarver was drunk, the cashier declined to sell him beer, according to court records.

"Tarver began cursing loudly, talking to (the cashier) in a threatening manner," Barker wrote in the opinion.

"Tarver then managed to pull three crumpled one dollar bills out of his pocket and laid them on the counter," Barker wrote. "He told (the clerk), 'We need gas' and then turned to leave."

Once at the gas pumps, Tarver was too drunk to figure out how to turn the device on, the opinion stated. Two off-duty employees then helped him turn on the pump, according to the opinion. They later watched as Tarver got behind the wheel and drove into the oncoming lane of traffic on Rutledge Pike, the opinion stated.

A University of Tennessee professor later determined that Tarver's vehicle would have run out of gas before encountering West and Richardson if he had not been able to buy more fuel.

Knox County Circuit Court Judge Harold Wimberly had dismissed the lawsuit by West and Richardson, ruling that state law did not allow a claim of negligence against Pioneer for injuries Tarver caused.

The case heads back to his court for trial, where a jury must decide if blame should be placed on Pioneer and its employees. The state Supreme Court ruling only allows the case to proceed. The justices did not rule on whether Pioneer was negligent.

"We're pleased," Coleman said. "Now we can go forward with the trial itself."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: attacklawyer; gassed; scotus; tankedup; totalbullsht
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Michael.SF.
Which would be a good thing for the defense to point out to the jury

Let's hope so.

81 posted on 08/22/2005 1:53:44 PM PDT by SolidRedState (E Pluribus Funk --- (Latin taglines are sooooo cool! Don't ya think?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Hmm.. What about pay at the pump? Unless drunks can't remember enough number sequencing to use the card reader at the pump...

By-pass that newspaper registration, go here...

82 posted on 08/22/2005 1:54:22 PM PDT by TerryGale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So now it's the common citizen to enforce the laws now? This is BS...let the judge stand around the pumps and enforce it...


83 posted on 08/22/2005 1:55:55 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planekT
Blow, Pump, and Pay.

Must be the new X-42 Krintong Gas & Go...

84 posted on 08/22/2005 1:57:28 PM PDT by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
AMERIKA - RIP!

Death By Juduciary

85 posted on 08/22/2005 1:59:26 PM PDT by patriot_wes (papal infallibility - a proud tradition since 1869)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frithguild
These policy arguments are now reduced to closing arguments. So do you think you can sell this in the face of evidence that the guy was falling down drunk and he could have been stopped by a call to the police?

I think that is one of the reasons why the court here ruled that negligence was a possibility.

This situation was akin to selling a loaded gun to a falling-down drunk. It's a pretty extreme case.

86 posted on 08/22/2005 1:59:26 PM PDT by Modernman ("A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy." -Disraeli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Well, that's it for self-serve stations...


87 posted on 08/22/2005 2:02:48 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Selling gas to a drunk could make store owners legally responsible for injuries suffered if the intoxicated motorist causes a crash, the state Supreme Court has ruled.

And if they refuse to sell the gas and the guy runs out of gas in the middle of the hiway causing a multi-car pileup and deaths?

Undoubtedly the smart play here was to delay the drunk and call police, but this sounds like a lawyers fishing trip looking for someone with money that they can take.

88 posted on 08/22/2005 2:08:28 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aQ_code_initiate
Why not shoot the idiot who sold him the car? Or the poltroon who gave birth to him? {/sarcasm}

Those will be the next lawsuits. {/Not sarcasm}

89 posted on 08/22/2005 2:08:46 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby

This isn't about finding fault, it's about finding the deepest pockets.

This court is ruling for trial lawyers plain and simple.


90 posted on 08/22/2005 2:13:23 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"Selling gas to a drunk could make store owners legally responsible for injuries suffered if the intoxicated motorist causes a crash, the state Supreme Court has ruled."



how the hell is a store employee supposed to KNOW if the individual is drunk? what are they gonna do, use a breathalyzer on every customer? what if the individual pays by credit card at the pump????

what IS this b*llsh*t!!????


91 posted on 08/22/2005 2:14:53 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
What the HELL ever happened to personal responsibility?

Huh? It flew out the window long ago and was replaced by lawsuits that are all about making lawyers rich.

92 posted on 08/22/2005 2:17:37 PM PDT by demkicker (Life has many choices. Eternity has only two. Which one have you chosen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I was ready to wax indignantly until I read this:

Once at the gas pumps, Tarver was too drunk to figure out how to turn the device on, the opinion stated. Two off-duty employees then helped him turn on the pump, according to the opinion. They later watched as Tarver got behind the wheel and drove into the oncoming lane of traffic on Rutledge Pike, the opinion stated.

There's the culpability.

93 posted on 08/22/2005 2:22:34 PM PDT by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

This has nothing to do with personal responsibility. It has everything to do with the first rule of our Tort System: Find the MONEY and Get it ALL!

IF Bush wants to really make a difference in this country He needs to take on the Trial Lawyres.

RamS


94 posted on 08/22/2005 2:24:41 PM PDT by RamingtonStall (More Guns ==> Less Crime! Get your CHL today! http://www.ohioccw.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

Great for your Intern-al combustion.


95 posted on 08/22/2005 2:36:35 PM PDT by planekT (No fence, no vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
More importantly, the attorneys alleged, employees at the Exxon, owned by East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co., knew Tarver was drunk - so drunk that a cashier refused to sell him beer.

Here is the problem. If they thought he was too drunk to sell him beer.... Clearly he shouldn't have sold him gas. In babblespeak, this is what enablers do..

But far be it from us to demand that teachers should recognize illegal schoolchildren, and therefore call the cops..

This is negligent behavior. What if the drunk you sold gas to ran into your kids? I'm not saying the attendant was 100% responsible. But he contributed to the accident.

96 posted on 08/22/2005 2:49:38 PM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (When the disbeliever sees this, he will say, 'How nice if I was also turned into sand.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
You did not read the whole article. He was stumbling drunk and reeked of alcohol. The store refused to sell him beer because he was so obviously drunk.
97 posted on 08/22/2005 3:11:58 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

American courts are completely corrupt.


98 posted on 08/22/2005 3:54:38 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planekT
Blow, Pump, and Pay.

They already do that in Frisco. It's called a bath house.

99 posted on 08/22/2005 5:19:58 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Marching Morons are coming...and they're breeding more Democrats beyond all reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Okay, this has gone waaaaaaay too far. This DWI situation has turned into a witch hunt. Pure hysteria.


100 posted on 08/22/2005 5:45:33 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson