Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enchante; RWR8189; Fedora; Grampa Dave; STARWISE; justshutupandtakeit; Howlin; xzins; Shermy; ...

This oped reinforces the observation that the Rats and their Rino friends would do anything to make the Saddam Iraqi's appear to be innocent of 9/11 along with supposedly no WMDs and the buried attack on the WTC during the Clintoon administration.

Why would the Rats, their pet mediots and pet Rinos be so protective of the mass murderers of Iraq before 9/11 up to today?

There are two probable reasons:

1. The money they got from the Oil from Food Scandal and Opecker Thugs to keep Iraq out of the picture before 9/11 and after the first attacks on the WTC during the Clintoons rule of horror.

2. Their absolute hated of GW, which has controlled them since 2000.

GW and a few of his trusted cabinet members probably got an very top secret intel dump from a key ally after 9/11 implicating Saddam and other mass murdering Iraqis in both attacks on the WTC. GW and his admin can't disclose this data anymore than Roosevelt could disclose the code cracking data on the Japanese pre and post Pearl Harbor.


44 posted on 08/29/2005 6:01:11 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave; Enchante; piasa; backhoe
GW and a few of his trusted cabinet members probably got an very top secret intel dump from a key ally after 9/11 implicating Saddam and other mass murdering Iraqis in both attacks on the WTC.

In relation to that (these were copied a while back; some of the links may no longer be working):

"Israeli intelligence: Iraq financed attacks", 9/12/2001

Iraq recruited Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama Bin Laden and his Islamic allies to carry out the suicide attacks around the United States, according to Israeli intelligence.

Israeli officials and intelligence analysts said the suicide hijackings that downed the World Trade Center and destroyed parts of the Pentagon was too large an operation for any one group. The analysts said the operation was also too big even for a coalition of Islamic terrorists headed by Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama Bin Laden.

"Laurie Mylroie on CBS pointing out possible Iraqi connection to NYC and DC terror attack...", 9/12/2001

"Ex-CIA Chief Woolsey Sees Iraqi Fingerprints", 9/14/2001

Woolsey commended Laurie Mylroie's opinion essay "Bin Laden Isn't Only One to Blame," which appeared in Thursday's editions of the Wall Street Journal, as well as "Getting Serious," the newspaper's accompanying editorial.

"Mossad warned CIA of attacks - report", 9/17/2001

Mossad officials traveled to Washington last month to warn the CIA and the FBI that a cell of up to 200 terrorists was planning a major operation, according to a report in the Sunday Telegraph here yesterday.

"An Iraqi Connection?", 9/18/2001

CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart reports the United States has received an intelligence report that Mohammed Atta, the hijacker who is named as the pilot of the first plane to strike the World Trade Centers, met early this year somewhere in Europe with the head of the Iraqi intelligence service.

"Gertz: Bin Laden linked with Iraqi agents days before attack", 9/21/2001

Osama bin Laden was in contact with Iraqi government agents from his base in Afghanistan in the days leading up to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to U.S. intelligence officials... Bin Laden's contacts with the Iraqi government were detected before the attacks, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity...

"Pentagon Board Wants Hit on Iraq After Afghanistan, But Secretary of State Powell Fears Strike Could Shatter Arab Anti-Terror Coalition: Rove and Hughes Not Included in Nightly Meeting of Principals", 9/23/2001

At a two-day meeting last week of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, which is chaired by hard-liner Richard Perle, eminent conservatives including Henry Kissinger, James Schlesinger, Dan Quayle and Newt Gingrich reached a consensus that U.S. military forces should strike Iraq shortly after an initial blow against Afghanistan in response to the terror attack on New York and Washington, Newsweek reports in the current issue.

"Tariq Aziz-'We are ready for War' (warns of grave consequences)", 10/18/2001

Iraq said yesterday that it expects to be attacked by America and Britain and warned of the 'grave' consequences if any attempt was made to topple Saddam Hussein from power.

"USA, U.K. TO SHOOT MISSILES ON IRAQ?", 10/28/20001

Novosti correspondents Yuri Zinin and Konstantin Maximov) -- The USA and Great Britain are plotting to hit 300 targets in Iraq with a thousand missiles to overthrow President Saddam Hussain, Iraq's Vice-Premier Tariq Aziz said in an interview the British-based Sunday Telegraph carries today.

"Final US ultimate warning to Iraq", 11/5/2001

The Kuwaiti daily al-Seyash issued on Sunday quoted sources at the British house of commons as saying that the British prime minister Tony Blair asked the Jordanian King Abdullah II during his visit to Amman to convey a final warning from the US administration to Iraq on the need of accepting the return back of the UN inspectors to Baghdad within three weeks, otherwise the next station of the war against terrorism after Afghanistan will be Iraq.

"Russia Would Oppose Attack on Iraq", 12/2/2001

Russia would oppose a U.S. military strike against Iraq and believes diplomacy is the only way to solve the arms inspections impasse between Washington and Baghdad, a Russian envoy visiting the Middle East said Sunday.

"Iraq officially threatens Israel", 12/4/2001

For the first time, Iraq has specifically threatened Israel with retaliation for any U.S.-led campaign against the regime of President Saddam Hussein.

"Blair Warns Saddam", 12/4/2001

British troops could take the war against terrorism to Iraq, the Prime Minister has suggested. Tony Blair refused to rule out British involvement in any military action against Baghdad.

"Attack on Iraq 'Off the Table,' Officials Furious at State Dept. ", 12/5/2001

An impeccable, hall of fame Washington Insider close to the State Department has said that they are furious that an attack on Iraq was 'put off the table.'

The source said that there was not enough unimpeachable evidence to make the war stick with the coalition and that the next target may be Indonesia.

Wolfowitz walked out of the decision meeting absolutely furious, which is interesting becuase it is usually the State Department who have been the 'doves' on this issue recently, but in the last few weeks Colin Powell has drastically changed his position to go after Iraq policy wise in the meetings.

"France won't back U.S. attack on Iraq", 2/22/2002

The French ambassador to the United States says Europe will not support any U.S. military action against Iraq without clear evidence that a military response is warranted.

Etc.

58 posted on 08/29/2005 3:46:52 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson