The mess of our Constitution in New Orleans: a video (Vanity)

http://media.putfile.com/NewOrleansGunConfiscationSmall ^ | Sept. 10, 2005 | Alessandro Fiaschi

[alessandrofiaschi]

It is really beyond belief what is happening in New Orleans!

< http://media.putfile.com/NewOrleansGunConfiscationSmall >

US Second Amendmend, states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

We need to restore and enforce adherence to the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights as the supreme protective law for firearms of law-abiding people. I can't stand this kind of gross breach of Constitutional Law, presently in New Orleans.

[DocH]

Thanks for the link to your "Constitutional Crisis" video compilation. Too bad that first clip is so pixellated, but other than that unavoidable aspect, it was a very good compilation.

I never thought I'd say this, but I LOVE what that lawyer had to say, which was, in short, "Leave me and my neighbors THE F**K ALONE, and everyone will be alright, INCLUDING YOU (law enforcement and military personnel)!".

[DocH]

Thanks for the post. It IS too bad we don't have a REAL conservative president, especially when we see what is happening, with no outrage from him, down in New Orleans.

[GW and Twins Pawpaw]

Corruption is corruption. I can't make a distinction between 'moral' or 'economic'. To me it's like sticking one's finger up to test the winds. Does this remind anyone other than me of the last dimboRAT preidential nominee?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Jason_b]

"A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference. --Thomas Jefferson

"...but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights..." -Alexander Hamilton, speaking of standing armies in The Federalist 29.

"That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies in time of peace should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power." -George Mason, Article 13 of the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776.

The above is the sort of information of which most of our "official types" are either absolutely ignorant, or cognizant but choose to ignore because their agenda is more important to them.

To the one guardsman who said he'd rather be in Iraq, because he doesn't want to have to think about what he might have to do if someone pops around the corner [, shoots, and he might have to shoot back at an American]

My reply to him and all the other Constitutionally illiterate "official" types is, you are wronging the people by disarming them.
You are going from house to house like a swat team,
with the posture of an aggressor,
confronting people who have committed no crime,
telling them what to do when they don't agree you have authority in their state,
taking away their means of self-defense.
Will you be able to protect everyone you disarm? (which misses the point).
What happens when a disarmed person is savaged by criminals under your watch, will you be liable for damages?Of course not, you'll have immunity.
Disarming a law abiding people is a war crime, even if you are a well intentioned ignoramus.
As the law abiding people down there are being disarmed, they should be aware they are engaged in a so-far cold war with their government which is relieving them of their Bill of Rights.

If someone other than a lawbreaker, looter etc., does shoot at you, I won't wonder why. You can disobey an illegal order, and the order to disarm law abiding people is an illegal order. If you fail to disobey this illegal order you are subject to being shot at.
If they who shoot at you survive the fire exchange, get arrested, put on trial for attacking the "official" agents, and I were on the jury, I'd refuse to convict them on the grounds that they were defending their rights. If you shoot at a person while trying to seize his means of personal/family/property protection, I'd recommend you be charged with a war crime.

I don't think it would hurt to have a web page like a petition, for all our government to see, but actually a roll or list of people who assert their refusal to convict an individual protecting his rights from US agents. This would be the perfect answer to those US agent types who we know wouldn't mind firing on citizens. If that lawyer we saw had electricity, he would be a good candidate to set it up. I'd sign it.

[DocH]

Agree with all you say.

I'd sign a petition also, but we also need to jerk the chains of our elected reps in Washington, including the President, to let them know of our outrage over the trampling of our fellow citizens 2nd Amendment rights, and other related Constitutional rights, ALONG WITH the effective stripping of their GOD-given right to self defense!

[DocRock]

Thanks for your comments and I hope you don't mind me posting this here. The first film segment is very pixilated and if anyone has a clean copy, I'll be happy to rework this movie with a good copy.

---

Dial-up Users Can
Click Here to Watch
Low Quality, 6 Minute
2.2 MB .wmv Video


To Read About Freedom of The Press
Being Infringed, Click The Pic

---

[alessandrofiaschi]

Thanks! You've done a wonderful work and it deserves to be viewed here too. The clear copy, regarding the first part, is linked above, it is the link at the beginning.

[DocRock]

For some strange reason, it is only audio on this computer. I'll have to wait until Monday when I get to work to grab a clean copy. Thanks for the info.