Posted on 10/03/2005 4:38:01 PM PDT by doug from upland
(Part 1)FR EXCLUSIVE: Breaking -- Major Newspaper Doing Blockbuster Story on Peter Paul and Hillary
Oct. 3, 2005
Doug from Upland
Reporting from Upland, CA
FReepers, we have this report exclusively for you first here on FreeRepublic, the political website of record. A major newspaper, the identity of which will be released later this week, will publish a blockbuster story on Sunday discussing donor Peter Paul and the beneficiary of his $1.9 million campaign contribution in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
We do not know yet the path the story will take, but in 8,000 words, Hillary is not going to be very happy. Hillary, Bill, and their powerful cadre of spinners and coverup artists have been unable to stop the story.
As Tom DeLay faced his second indictment today, the questions continue to be asked by Paul. Why has Hillary Clinton been allowed to file three false FEC reports? Why has no one attempted to bring her to justice? Why has the biggest campaign fraud on record not been above the fold on page one in major newspapers? Why has it not lead nightly news stories?
It is more than just Hillary who is involved. Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell and Terry McAuliffe are up to their eyeballs in this scandal. David Rosen, a low level functionary in Hillary's campaign, was up to his eyeballs, but a Los Angeles jury decided he was not the one to punish. Hillary 2000 Campaign treasurer Andrew Grossman, who signed all three of the fraudulent FEC reports, is up to his eyeballs in the scandal. Amazingly, Grossman has so far escaped indictment.
In 2001, prior to the due date of the final amended FEC report, attorney David Kendall was served on behalf of Hillary in Paul's unprecedented and historic civil suit against a former president and sitting senator for fraud and conspiracy. His client was provided with cancelled checks and invoices, along with a demand to declare the campaign contributions or return the money. For five years the massive coverup has continued. The civil case, after review by the California Supreme Court, is headed for a Los Angeles superior court early in 2006 where Hillary, Bill, and several others will be under oath. Many of the Hollywood elite who attended the gala fundraising concert in 2000 are on the witness list. It will be a civil trial to remember and may be the only thing standing in the way of Hillary becoming commander in chief.
The case against Tom DeLay may be esoteric and, although it may have pushed the envelope, may not have been criminal conduct. What Hillary did is clearly criminal, it is easy to understand, and it was done in broad daylight.
Where is New York's own Ronnie Earle? Where is a prosecutor with the guts to go after those who committed the mother of all campaign finance scandals?
SPECIAL NOTE: It is expected that the hard-hitting documentary INDICTING HILLARY will be released during the campaign of 2006. INDICTING HILLARY chronicles her massive campaign finance fraud, her continuing failure to obey the law, her refusal to amend three fraudulent reports, and the aiding and abetting of her criminal conduct by a former president, William Jefferson Clinton, a current governor/former DNC chairman, Ed Rendell, and the immediate past DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe. Hillary, you'd better put some ice on that.
didn't say it was a liberal paper, more likely the washington times, NY post (?)...i doubt WSJ would do it.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,but Article 1 , section 2 says
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.and Article 1 Section 3 says
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.I see no requirement for an impeachment other than the person holds an office of honor (hence the titles Hon. George W. Bush and Hon. Hillary Clinton--shudder). You can impeach a Senator just like you can impeach a judge (I believe). Impeachment is not usually necessary to remove a Senator or Representative because they also have the power to expel a member with 2/3 concurrence. But if used, the Senator or Representative would be barred from any office with the title "Honorable" (judges, executive secretaries, senators, representatives, and the presidency)Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law
I'm just not saying.
Aw, shucks...
Well, maybe some of the mud will stick, and Lynn Swann will have a chance!
I'd like to believe this would put her in the hoosegow where she belongs. But I don't think it will happen. Not even sure this will mar her run ( and I do believe she'll run ) in 2008.
Yeah, well at least we know his FACTOR GEAR is very progressive.
Alrighty then. It's past my bedtime anyway. But please, put me on your new ping list for when the story is announced here at FR?
:)
Ping list request
You and me both!
Seems to me the Clinton administration (particularly at two degrees from the President) probably set records in the number of their insiders being indicted and convicted.
But it also seems to me that it is traditional that past presidents (and probably their wives) are not prosecuted. After all, if they were then every time the administration changed there would be a bunch of Ronnie Earles out to indict them.
However, Democrats have been throwing tradition out the window in recent years. It also used to be a tradition that past presidents didn't speak against the current officeholder. But then came Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.
It also used to be a tradition that the differences between political parties stopped at our borders. But anymore, the Democrats are essentially campaigning for al Queda, France, etc.
Have you tried to connect Hugh Hewitt into this saga? He's well versed at explaining legal maneuvers, highly familiar with beltway hi-jinx, and I think his audience is fairly influential.
Stay safe and strong.
.
I have tried on several occasions to get Hugh to have Peter on his show. I don't know why, but he ignored my emails and phone calls to his screener.
Thanks for the update and the links as well.
He was self-hired. No, no, wait, I've got it now! It was Linda Tripp. Yeah, that's it. Linda Tripp hired him, that wench!
Between the Klintons' bribe money being spread around and the FBI files, this story will go nowhere.
Jay Livingstone is a songwriter. I presume many people have hired him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.