Skip to comments.
Kristol: ‘Mood is Bleak’ at White House (uh-huh)
newsmax ^
| 10/18/05
| staff
Posted on 10/18/2005 11:35:27 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-223 next last
To: pissant
Bill Kristol getting sillilied humored . . .
101
posted on
10/18/2005 12:16:32 PM PDT
by
w_over_w
(GO ASTROS!!! Make it to the big one . . . this time?)
To: w1andsodidwe
Oh, really?
Then you must have missed his support for the War on Terror.
102
posted on
10/18/2005 12:17:31 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
To: w_over_w
I still like Mort. One of the oh so few dems I do like.
103
posted on
10/18/2005 12:17:36 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: FlipWilson
The WH can't talk about this, Wilson, the CIA, the WMD, that is supposed to be for any right-wing or just plain FAIR investigative reporters.
But they are AWOL as usual.
And have been for 40 years, in which they have made ZERO inroads into influencing and educating the average citizen here or abroad.
They are useless, and their peers on the left run rings around them day after day, year after year.
To: Owen
Thank you for your post, you just made my afternoon.
105
posted on
10/18/2005 12:18:18 PM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Grampa Dave
LOL. Hold yer fire then. We want you around these parts still...
106
posted on
10/18/2005 12:18:22 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: samantha
He is a little man that cannot live up to is Mother's reputation let alone his Dad's reputation.Well as a conservative and an advocate of smaller government, I wouldn't want anyone to try to live up to Irving Kristol's reputation. I remember what he did in 2000 but I also remember 2-3 years ago his rag of a magazine taken as absolute truth when it advocated the invasion of Iraq, which it did endlessly
107
posted on
10/18/2005 12:18:33 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
Actually, unlike you neo-coms, we call out other conservatives when they're acting like they want a nice write-up in the Style Section.
Neo-coms never question their leaders, as evidenced by none of them calling out Farrakhan for his latest rantings about levees being blown up.
To: pissant
109
posted on
10/18/2005 12:19:05 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: angkor
LOL. Call Blocking is in order!
110
posted on
10/18/2005 12:19:09 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: threeleftsmakearight
Actually, unlike you neo-coms, we call out other conservatives when they're acting like they want a nice write-up in the Style Section.?!?! Neo-com, please define. I never supported Kristol nor any of other faux conservatives
111
posted on
10/18/2005 12:20:08 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Owen
Yes, but its human nature to jump out of the foxhole and on the "popular" bandwagon when your being attacked.
We just whine about it later, and blame someone else.
To: billbears
To: Owen
114
posted on
10/18/2005 12:23:45 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: w_over_w
Priceless.....though I do not condone it.
115
posted on
10/18/2005 12:24:33 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: billbears
William Kristol was one of the original Neocons, and his Mother Getrude Himmelfarb was also a Neocon. They had stellar careers and as far as I know not in backstabbing. The Weekly Standard and Kristol were big proponents of The War on terrorism as most on freerepublic,and we realize Rome was not built in a day. kristol thinks we and the white House give a crap what he thinks. He is so small both physically and mentally that he should drive a Scion as his limousine.
116
posted on
10/18/2005 12:26:27 PM PDT
by
samantha
(cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
To: samantha
You must have missed his support on the War for Terror and much of the administration's foreign policy.
Domestically, he has criticized President Bush most particularly on immigration and spending as have many conservatives.
I began reading Bill Kristol (who has one of the nation's BEST conservative mind's) long before GW ever came upon the National scene, and he doesn't base his opinions on who is in office, not now, no ever. Don't look for him to change. And that is a GOOD thing.
117
posted on
10/18/2005 12:28:29 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
To: finnman69
"If fitzgerald was going to indict Wednesday, would he not have already issued 'target' letters to those to be indicted? That certainly would have leaked."Yep. And Rove or Libby (1) would not have testified anew and (2) would have stepped down. Thus, the question is really: Who has not testified? Wilson, Plame, Pinkus come to mind...
118
posted on
10/18/2005 12:31:57 PM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: pissant
Separated at birth: Bill Kristol and Ron Popeil.
To: wideminded
120
posted on
10/18/2005 12:34:13 PM PDT
by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-223 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson