Mystery-Woman Miers (Has Supported ICC, Gay Adoptions, Tax Hikes; Some "Conservative," Huh...?)

World Net Daily ^ | 10/03/2005 | Joseph Farrah

[verity]

NTSA.

[Dane]

Didn't show up on Search

Yeah right, just put in the term "mystery woman" and do the search through the date, and voila this know nothing farah hit piece, but you already knew that.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

it is unclear to me at least whether she supports these things.

I have absolutely no difficulty believing that statement to be 110% true.

And then some.

[lormand]

"I hear Sununu speaks highly of her"

lol

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

but you already knew that.

Either re-read Posting #20, or else go run and fetch A Big Person to do so for you.

[JudgemAll]

wow, Bush admin joining the gang of pedophiles and playing with liberal soviet rifraf....this really take the cake...but is not surprizing given the consciouslessness of liberals who give themselves up and commit suicide....why is Bush sleeping with such people he apparently know nothing about (not an excuse)

No sparks in this

[Dane]

that they ardently champion -- and even lie on behalf of! -- a pro-ICC quota queen for the United States Supreme Court.

LOL! Then why is she working for an administartion that effectively neutered the ICC.

Oh BTW, she is more pro-2nd amendment than Bork.

"The same liberties that ensure a free society make the innocent vulnerable to those who prevent rights and privileges and commit senseless and cruel acts," Miers wrote in Texas Lawyer when she was president of the state bar. "Those precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble ... access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance. "We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs," she concluded.

Harriet Miers, 1992

Link

[ez]

Schumer on MTP just said "And I agree with my friends on the right, that we need to know Harriet Miers judicial philosophy." Congratulations Far Right...you just sealed for all time the fact that Chucky Schumer is RIGHT to demand to know the nominees philosophy.

[lormand]

Debunked?

Didn't see it

[markedmannerf]

No matter what you say there were better choices. Whenever liberals choose someone for the Supreme Court that are strong liberals. So why cant Bush pick a strong conservative instead of someone that no one knows anything about and try to make the liberals happy?

[JudgemAll]

yep yep yep, sigh....

I'm not giving up on Bush..... and FreeRepublic

.....AND THIS IS PRECISELY WHY HARRIET MUST BE STOPPED!!!!!!

n'ough said.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Debunked? Didn't see it

The poster in question has already had that humiliating little fact pointed out. And is busily scampering away from it. :)

[ez]

Schumer on MTP just said "And I agree with my friends on the right, that we need to know Harriet Miers judicial philosophy." Congratulations Far Right...you just sealed for all time the fact that Chucky Schumer is RIGHT to demand to know the nominees philosophy.

[Dane]

No matter what you say there were better choices.

That's your opinion, you can make your "better" choice when you are on the campaign trail for a year to become President of the United States.

I'll trust Bush rather than some blowhards.

[308MBR]

Just as I'm sure Bill Cliton would be a hoot on a night out with the guys hitting the stip clubs, but had no busines being President, Harriet Miers is a nice, intelligent, rather recently converted Evangelical who has no business on SCOTUS. Nothing personal.

I was NO WAY the FIRST DAY.

If we had FR and the internet when Souter was up for nomination, he wouldn't be where he is today!

Two thumbs up for Jim Robinson for giving us a place to vent our facts and frustrations, even if all of us don't toe the party line all the time!

[George W. Bush]

You're the third one I've noticed saying this since yesterday. You switched because of the affirmative action thing, like the other two I saw?

Anyway, we'll see. Even if the entire base and all the conservative think tanks and journalists oppose her to a man, it's still an uphill job to stop our goofy herd of GOP senators from confirming her.

[Dane]

Sorry Starbucks dude, see reply #20.

Of course farah knew that, but conviently left it out.

[JudgemAll]

Lawyering is a nasty job... and women doing it, save for genuine counsel, gain little power for much filth...Harriet proves it

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Reply #20 is mine, cupcake.

Gee... you really aren't much good at this sort of thing, are you...?

[Dane]

Sorry Starbucks dude, see reply #20

Excuse me reply #19.