Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duquesne Sophomore Challenges 'Sexual Orientation' Harassment Charge
Agape Press ^ | 11/1/05 | Jim Brown

Posted on 11/01/2005 4:21:43 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican
The actual name of the school is Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit

Apparently, the Holy Spirit left the administrators of this school some time back.

61 posted on 11/02/2005 10:22:29 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smith288
The words he chose were symbolic

Miner seems to be saying his use of the term 'sub-human' was symbolic as well.

62 posted on 11/02/2005 10:24:40 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

>> It's news to them, too.

LOL. The Post-Gazette is full of mushy-headed tripe from alleged Catholics who maintain that because Jesus said nothing about homosexuality (I really don't know) that Duquesne (as a Catholic school) should embrace the Gay-Straight Alliance.

Of course, the number of straights will be very low, but what are stats among zealots?


63 posted on 11/02/2005 10:24:57 AM PST by relictele (How can Hillary run the country when she couldn't manage a household of 3?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

You commented:

***I just posted Duquesne's response. The essay was on Catholic teaching about homosexuality, not "good and bad points".

I haven't been able to find that. Could you post a link or direct quote? My understanding was that he was required to write an essay showing "both sides". If that is not the case, many on the thread would like to know. Where did you post Dusquesne's response?


64 posted on 11/02/2005 10:31:55 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: relictele

The "straight" part is to recruit new members for the "gay" part. Often they use the word "questioning".


65 posted on 11/02/2005 10:32:57 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

What he said may or may not be wrong, but since when do we punish people for saying the wrong thing (by "we" I mean rational people). This guy is entitled to his opinion, whether it is wrong or not, and what use is there having an opinion if you have to button your lip about it.

As for the reference to Hitler saying things like "subhuman" that is a red herring, unless and until this guy proposes killing homosexuals, which I don't believe anyone has claimed he did.

(Tax-chick, this isn't leveled at you, I just decided to post after reading your post.)


66 posted on 11/02/2005 10:36:47 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican
":The actual name of the school is Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit"

Actually, its Duquesne University of the Holy Ghost. Its my alma mater.

67 posted on 11/02/2005 10:43:47 AM PST by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smith288
me->Christ called the scribes and pharisees vipers and snakes.

you->That could be cnsidered putting words in Jesus' mouth wouldnt you say?

Matthew 23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Looks like the bible says Jesus said that. Except he used serpenst instead of snakes. The words he chose were symbolic

He called them less than human (a snake). How is that symbolic? How do you know Mr. Miner wasn't speaking 'symbolicly' also? You don't. According to all the commentaries I could find (7 or 8) Jesus was telling the people that the pharisees were more like snakes than like men. They were evil, poisoness, brutal, vicious etc. I don't see anything symbolic about it.

68 posted on 11/02/2005 11:06:32 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

last I heard, Catholic teaching on homosexuality is "no."


69 posted on 11/02/2005 11:11:10 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

While persecuting this guy for his comments is wrong, this guy should have taken this opportunity to use St. Thomas model to prove unequivacably the sin of homosexuality. Thomas always listed the other side of the argument first, and then blew their arguments to bits one by one.


70 posted on 11/02/2005 11:16:28 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Sanctions

The sanctions for the code violations included taking the offensive material off the site and writing an essay regarding the Catholic Church’s official teaching related to the dignity and respect to be shown for all human beings.


71 posted on 11/02/2005 11:17:49 AM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

See, here is what homosexual men do: they put their private parts into each others' fecal matter.

How is that NOT sub-human?


72 posted on 11/02/2005 11:21:32 AM PST by subterfuge (Obama, mo mama...er Osama-La bamba, uh, bama...banana rama...URP!---Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

Is this a direct quote?

So the proposed essay was not about homosexuality at all?


73 posted on 11/02/2005 11:41:48 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

I agree with your points, NCLaw441.

I am concerned about his precise wording as a Catholic, because he is saying that his opinions are based on his faith.


74 posted on 11/02/2005 11:42:41 AM PST by Tax-chick (I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: John O

Whatever... You can call them whatever you want.

Jesus wouldnt call a homosexual a sub-human.


75 posted on 11/02/2005 11:44:39 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
The Pink Swastika is regarded by mainstream historians as historical revisionism. Homosexual behavior was a crime in Nazi Germany; in 1942 the death penalty was decreed for this crime and homosexuals discovered in the military were routinely shot. Between 50,000 and 100,000 homosexuals were forced to wear pink triangles and sent to concentration camps. Homosexuals were not subject to systematic extermination but to claim their treatment was "mild" or that only a "FEW homosexuals" were involved is simply not accurate.
76 posted on 11/02/2005 11:46:22 AM PST by megatherium (Hecho in China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: megatherium

Of course it's regarded as revisionism by "mainstream" historians. Basically all of academia is the playground of liberals and gay elites so anything that is accorded the stamp of approval by university connected historians is suspect.

Can you cite sources for your figures?


77 posted on 11/02/2005 12:13:29 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

That is a direct quote: http://www.newsroom.duq.edu/r20051028.html


78 posted on 11/02/2005 12:22:30 PM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

Thanks.

Here's another quote from the University website you linked to:

"Article IV, University Standards C-6
Harassment or discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin or citizenship status, age, disability, or veterans status."

And about the proposed "Gay Straight Alliance" Club:

"Background on the proposed Gay Straight Alliance:
In September, President Charles Dougherty, Provost Ralph Pearson, and Executive Director of Mission and Identity Fr. Tim Hickey received a proposal for the creation of a Gay Straight Alliance on Duquesne’s campus. Due to the clear implication on the University’s Catholic identity and mission, President Dougherty convened a special committee to examine the issue. Fr. Tim Hickey is leading the committee of students, faculty, staff and administrators, which is examining the issue in light of our Catholic identity and mission. This is a complex, sensitive issue that must be considered carefully."

Contact Information: 412-396-6050.

So the University has the standard discrimination policy including sexual orientation. Therefore, any words criticizing homosexual behavior can be stifled and punished by TPTB. It will be interesting to see if they allow the GSA club.

It boils down to this - homosexuals make the rules, and anyone who disses them will be severely punished. End of story. Unless, of course, the University adheres to Catholic teaching.


Oh, one additional paragraph caught my eye:

"This particular case was the result not of opposing the proposed Gay Straight Alliance or opposing homosexuality, but rather the use of the term “subhuman” and inflammatory language in a “Facebook” entry. Had the language used not been undermining to human dignity, the issue most likely would not have been brought to the attention of Judicial Affairs."

So criticizing the behavior of homosexuals affronts human dignity. But the Gay Straight Alliance Club which, if allowed, will advocate same sex acts, may not affront human dignity? They have to hash that one out?


79 posted on 11/02/2005 12:36:32 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I don't disagree with your analysis, but I will be surprised if they approve a gay straight alliance club.

The Pope is trying to eliminate gay influence in the church.

Duquesne is really a great school. The administration is religious and tries to conform to Catholic doctrine without discriminating.

Ask yourself this question: How many colleges don't already have gay organizations on campus?


80 posted on 11/02/2005 12:43:42 PM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson