Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2005 7:35:08 AM PST by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe Karns
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
2 posted on 11/13/2005 7:36:27 AM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

So the dowdie one says newspapers print gossip as news, but only if they have sources.


3 posted on 11/13/2005 7:43:45 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
Rush has been talking about the MSM attitude towards the "truth." They believe that it's not their job to be accurate. It is the job of the reader/listener to do the fact checking.

The trouble I find with that attitude is that they fail or are slow to widely disseminate the truth once is has been proved to them, and they are resentful and belligerent about it - ala Buckhead.

4 posted on 11/13/2005 7:47:01 AM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

This is another variation on the double standard we see in the MSM.

It is because they are not driven by a search for truth, but by an agenda of forming the world that they want.

Thus, the standard becomes: How can we spin the information that we have to advance the Agenda?

When we look at MSM reporting with this in mind, much is explained.


5 posted on 11/13/2005 7:47:19 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

The only source the dowdy one uses for her Hate GW opeds is her over drugged/whacked out brain.


7 posted on 11/13/2005 7:56:36 AM PST by Grampa Dave (MSM/RATs need to set a timetable for withdrawal in their illegitimate war on Bush. It's a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
JMO, but in light of these recent revelations, Congress should require newspapers and news shows to display the following advisory:

"Warning - it is not our practice to determine truth of our reporting. It is the sole responsibility of the consumer to do the fact checking."

Failure to post that warning should make these people personally liable for libel suits.

8 posted on 11/13/2005 7:57:09 AM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

Good work!


9 posted on 11/13/2005 7:58:26 AM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

Gee, sounds like both of these weirdos are parsing their words. Kinda goes back to the meaning of the word "is" is.
What crap they spew!


10 posted on 11/13/2005 8:00:45 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
I mean you go to a presidential press conference and when the president says something you don't only put it on if you can prove it, you put it on because it's what's being said and because it's relevant.

What an incredibly stupid thing to say. If the president says something at a press conference one can report on that because that is what he said...if you do an investigative report about a claim regarding the past you have an obligation to actually seek the truth and not just report what is said. These are two DIFFERENT types of reports and for someone who is supposed to be a reporter to fail to understand the difference...well, she needs to go back to school and take journalism 101 so she has a grasp of how reporting is actually done.

12 posted on 11/13/2005 8:02:41 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

Alright, you know the rule: bring out the CZJ pics.


13 posted on 11/13/2005 8:05:46 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
I only saw about 3 minutes of that interview (about all I can take of the toadying King), but in that 3 minutes Dowd stated that she's hunting for a husband and Larry King told her that he doesn't know that there is anyone, including those who do not agree with her views, that would not say that her writing is excellent. Blech.
16 posted on 11/13/2005 8:08:13 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

I still love Matt Drudge's comment on journalism. It's a trade, not a profession. Talk about putting these arrogant asses in their place.


17 posted on 11/13/2005 8:11:00 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

Well, there you have it... "News=Opinion". That explains it all, doesn't it?


19 posted on 11/13/2005 8:19:32 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

"Truth? TRUTH? We don need no steenkin truth! Now git before we disembowel ya."

24 posted on 11/13/2005 8:37:44 AM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
DOWD: I think she was too creditable.

I watched the LK interview as well.

Probably shouldn't nitpick, but it bothers me that so-called intellectual Dowd cannot use the English language above the 8th grade level.

She said: credible, which means believable or truthful. She meant to say credulous, which means easily convinced of something.

It is both amusing and irritating (I'm not sure in what proportion), when these liberals pretend to be educated and intelligent.

26 posted on 11/13/2005 8:41:40 AM PST by 2ndreconmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

Mary Mapes took the word of a Bush-hater who had been HOSPITALIZED FOR MENTAL ILLNESS as gospel.

She wanted to believe it. Or even if she didn't believe it, she thought it would help defeat the Republicans--which was her goal.


34 posted on 11/13/2005 10:03:05 AM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
news is what people say, what they think.

What planet does she come from?

35 posted on 11/13/2005 10:04:13 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns

"investigative reporting is not stenography."

I heard a similar thing said on FOx Watch by the resident liberal..I can't even remember his name. Only he said, "reporting is not stenography"

First..I guess we know how they feel about all the secretaries and court reporters out there....they obviously feel SO superior

But in actuality, a good reporter DOES mean getting it right and accurate, as a stenographer's main mission is. But too many journalist don't care about that credo any longer. A good reporter TRIES to get the WHOLE story accurately. Journalism 101 says that reporters are NOT to put in their own opinion...Obviously, that's not entirely possible HOWEVER journalists should avoid "loaded" words and should AT LEAST get quotes from both sides of the article. The lack of performing these basic requirements for an article is what has led the MSM back to "yellow journalism"


36 posted on 11/13/2005 10:15:31 AM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe Karns
DOWD: I think she was too creditable.

roflol!

38 posted on 11/13/2005 1:14:29 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson