Posted on 12/01/2005 6:12:34 PM PST by DoctorZIn
Top News Story
State Department rethinking Iran?
By Guy Dinmore in Washington
Published: November 30 2005 23:01 | Last updated: November 30 2005 23:01
Irans new president, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, is an irresponsible radical who is digging a hole for himself, a senior US official declared on Wednesday.Nicholas Burns, the State Departments number three official, launched a particularly personal attack in a speech that focused on Irans alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons, its support for terrorist groups, including Hamas and al-Qaeda, and its poor human rights record.
Through his statements and actions, President Ahmadi-Nejad is digging a hole for himself and he appears determined to keep on digging, Mr Burns told the School of Advanced International Studies at John Hopkins University.
Mr Burns, who liaises with the European Union in its nuclear talks with Iran, said the Bush administration would spend more dollars on supporting the pro-democracy efforts of the Iranian people in the hope they would change their own government.
But Iranians and others in the audience said that behind the tough rhetoric, the Bush administration was adopting a more pragmatic approach towards Iran that has upset neoconservatives and pro-Israel groups in Washington.
Analysts say recent shifts in policy have been driven by a realization that neoconservative promises of an implosion within the Iranian regime were premature at best, and that the US could ill afford another serious confrontation abroad, especially on the edge of Iraq where Iran exercises considerable influence.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac), one of the most influential lobby groups in the US, on Wednesday expressed its displeasure with the Bush administration, issuing a statement criticising what it called a disturbing shift in US policy towards Iran on the nuclear issue.
It said Iran had won a critical round in its game of cat and mouse with the international community last week, when the US decided not to refer Iran to the UN Security Council at a board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Aipac also condemned the recent decision by the US to back a Russian-European proposal that would allow Iran to master the initial stages of the nuclear fuel cycle by converting uranium into gas at its Isfahan facility.
Iran-watchers in Washington also see further evidence of a more pragmatic policy in the recent decision to get Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to Baghdad, to engage his Iranian counterpart there.
Mr Burns said that despite the absence of diplomatic relations since 1979, the US had not sought to impose a complete diplomatic silence in its dealings with Iran and would act in its national interests.
The policy statement delivered by Mr Burns differed little from his testimony to Congress in May except for the tough attack on Mr Ahmadi-Nejad who took office in August after a surprise election victory.
Mr Burns attacked what he called a highly ideological and confrontational foreign policy pursued by the president since then, including Irans decision to end its voluntary suspension of nuclear fuel cycle development, a combative speech to the UN, his sacking of some 40 experienced ambassadors, and his latest call for Israel to be wiped off the map.
Mr Burns speech appeared designed to highlight what the US hopes are the new battle-lines being drawn in Iran between people and government, rather than within the regime between reformists under the former president, Mohammad Khatami, and hardliners.
There is a clear struggle underway between the reactionary Iranian government and the moderate majority, Mr Burns said.
Although he promised more funding for pro-democracy activities, observers in Washington said the Bush administration was faced with a paucity of worthy recipients in the US, and considerable hurdles in overtly funding such groups inside Iran.
On the nuclear issue, Mr Burns said the US was working closely with the Europeans, Russia, India, China and other countries with the hope of forming one increasingly united and purposeful coalition to deter Irans efforts.
He again threatened that if Iran did not cooperate then it would face a UN Security Council debate at a time of our choosing. But he made no mention of sanctions, which China, Russia and India oppose.
Mr Burns said it was time for the world to react to this radical shift in Irans behavior and consider an alternative to the past policy of engagement.
He suggested the international community had constructive leverage through diplomatic contacts, trade and investment. But he made no specific recommendations.
- Gooya news reported that the wife of Akbar Ganji said: I think something might have happened that they have cancelled our visiting with Ganji !
- Iran Focus reported that with the parliamentary elections in Iraq less than three weeks away, several Shiite groups have started to claim that the revered twelfth Imam in Shiite Islam has guided Iraqis to vote for their candidate.
- Iran Focus reported that the former Supreme Commander of Irans elite Revolutionary Guards, Mohsen Rezai, has recently switched his allegiance from Rafsanjani to the new hard-line Iran president.
- The Financial Times reported that Nicholas Burns, the State Departments number three official appears to see the new battle-lines being drawn in Iran as between the people and government, rather than rather than the regime and the reformists.
- Aljazeera reported that Nicholas Burns said: It might be time to consider a different approach towards the new, more radical, more intolerant Iranian regime.
- Iran Focus reported that there were more than 420 recorded political protests in Iran over the past month.
- Expatica reported that Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Iran not to back away from cooperation with the U.N. nuclear supervisory body, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
- Dow Jones Newswires reported that Ahmadinejad reiterated Wednesday that Iran would never give up its nuclear program, adding: Our enemies have to know that the Iranian people will develop their nuclear technology to the limit.
- Reuters reported that Germany, France and Britain will resume nuclear talks with Iran only if Tehran signals it truly wants to dispel international fears about its atomic program.
- Arutz Sheva, IsraelNN.com reported that Gen. Zeevi Farkash, the head of Israeli intelligence said: The Iranian nuclear arms race has reached a point of no return.
- DefenceNews.com reported that the deputy chief of Irans hardline Revolutionary Guards has been appointed as deputy interior minister for security and police.
- Michael Ledeen, The National Review warned the Bush administration that its current approach towards Iran threatens to dismantle the accomplishments of the past 4 years and leave the US more vulnerable.
- Michael Rubin, Rivista di Intelligence published a report on: how to deal with kidnappings in Iraq.
- The Jerusalem Post asked whether Israel can continue to sit silently on the sidelines, pretending that the international community is successfully blocking the Iranian bomb.
- Iran Focus reported that the Commandant of Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) declared that Iran was exporting its Islamic revolution which would inevitably bring about the downfall of the United States in the Middle East.
- Spacewar reported that British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Tuesday it was an "incontrovertible" fact that Iran was developing long-range missiles.
- Rooz Online published reported that the Iranian press has been instructed not to publish news about the country nuclear dossier. They did so anyway.
- Meysam Tavab, Rooz Online reported that President Ahmadinejad has ordered a review of all the appointments in government agencies that took place during the last 8 years. The presidents directive calls for more rigorous ideological screening of applicants to government positions.
- Rooz Online reported that the cleric Zahedi, recently appointed as Chancellor of Tehran University, quickly resigned after massive student demonstrations.
- And finally, Slate published a cartoon: The Perils of Withdrawal.
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
President Ahmadinejad during his September address to the UN General Assembly | |
|
> State Department rethinking Iran?
> ... State Departments number three official, launched
> a particularly personal attack in a speech that focused
> on Irans alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons, ...
Or is this the Bush reform of Foggy Bottom finally
causing middle management to wake up and smell the
coffee?
So here stand George Bush. His feet cut out from under him by Democrats. Rino's and Democrats wanting to back out of Iraq and the Israeli's begging him to start a new war with Iran. He is damned if he does and damned if he doesnt.
We hear reports of Nuclear weapons being built in Iran, but didnt we hear the same thing about weapons in Iraq? The Dems were 4 square behind Bush when we went to war , Now they lie about being lied to . They will be 4 square behind him in Iraq until something goes wrong and then they will want his head again.
What is a man supposed to do when nothing he does suits half of the country. The Democrats have just about destroyed any credibility this country ever had and still they attack. If they win the Presidency next time what have they won? A country who's military will be stripped ,a country weakened by the very people wanting to lead it. The Democrats have taken the worlds greatest country and practically destroyed it.
Al Quaeda may be our enemy, but our most dangerous enemy is the Democrat party, and the cowards in our own.
The Holy Spirit is God. The Word is Christ. What you mean by the Word of God is apparently scripture. I do not believe that scripture is God.
Helloo?? And why waste time having discussions with people whom you believe aren't operating in the real world? And what does he think will be said at this "table" he's talking about? Maybe he'd like to hear some more about the 12th Imam? Or the apocalypse that Ahmadinejad is trying to bring about in the next 2 yrs?
Yes, let's sit down and talk to the religious fanatics and try to talk some sense into them.
We have a police state in Iran now - it will get worse. The Europeans will do nothing. The Iranian people will do nothing. The Israelis will build bombs. That's how it is.
"The Europeans will do nothing. The Iranian people will do nothing. The Israelis will build bombs. That's how it is."
Yes, and we will be in it up to our ears. I'm glad to see this article posted, again. I put it up yesterday ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1531778/posts ) because I've shifted my primary focus to Iran. IMHO, the long and bloody road to the final stages of the GWOT leads directly to Tehran. Few want to think about it, but we are in engaged in the opening stages of a world war.
Sorry about the post. I sent it to the wrong thread.
1 December 2005: Iran: Establishment of Virtual University on Martyrdom
I suppose nothing that comes out of Iran should surprise me anymore.
Now it seems they have established an on-line virtual university for martyrdom.
I don't suppose they give out student loans, do you? After all, they might have problems collecting once the person has crossed over and achieve Martyr status.
Iran: Establishment of Virtual University on Martyrdom
Siyasat-e Ruz
The secretary of the central headquarters of the Congress of the Martyrs of Universities in Muslim Countries gave news of the establishment of a virtual university on martyrdom.
Mohammad Aqarazi said: "With consideration to the idealism and progress of the students' movement and the fact that we strongly need this plan in our country, we decided to work on the ideological pillars and roots of jihad and martyrdom."
According to the report of ISNA he added: "In order to define the culture of martyrdom and martyrs this headquarters will establish the first virtual martyrdom university with the goal of the creation of scientific debates regarding the different dimensions of martyrdom and jihad in the form of different subjects in different sources, question and answer and eliminating the doubts of the students about jihad and martyrdom, training people's ideas, spreading the love and active life that one used to see in the lives of the martyrs, transferring the spirit of jihad and martyrdom to the university and educating the elites and students on the basic pillars of jihad and martyrdom and the production of science in framework of the chapters established."
In continuation Aqarazi added: "The enemies and the global arrogance are trying to imply that martyrdom is an emotional sense. But this matter is going to be studied in this university so that it becomes clear that martyrdom is only an ideological and deep matter. In this university we are going to study the psychological, sociological, theological and artistic dimensions of martyrdom."
Aqarazi also added: "We have talked with some university professors in order to establish the scientific board of this virtual university on martyrdom and we are continuing our activities." He said: "What is expected from a university composition is intellectual activity. This is the reason why we thought about the establishment of this university and hope that everyone reaches this conclusion that martyrdom is a blessing."
A science of murder and mayhem...Yeah, the world needs more junk science! BS
Clearly, I can see that he is the Iman al Kalbi". He is a psychotic and dangerous nutter..
To read todays thread click here.
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.