Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/18/2005 2:45:45 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
Mysterious how the howls for finding leakers of secret information suddenly silence when a real crime has happened...
2 posted on 12/18/2005 2:48:15 PM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

For a second I thougt Time Magazine was going to join the 'good guys'.


3 posted on 12/18/2005 2:48:40 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
The President should immediately instruct the Justice Department to commence a full-scale investigation to determine who leaked this information, and see to it that those guilty are prosecuted to the full extent of applicable law. The investigation should be conducted by Justice's regular investigative staff—no "special" or "independent" prosecutors wanted or needed; and one of it's primary and initial methods should be to subpoena management, editorial, and reportorial personnel at the New York Times under threat of jail time for contempt if they refuse to name the sources who provided this classified information to them.

This isn't about free speech anymore. Some people should be doing some hard time for compromising national security.

4 posted on 12/18/2005 2:49:44 PM PST by Herford Turley (Conservatism will save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

This "scandal" is nothing more than a Book Promotion and a masking of the Iraq Vote!!

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


6 posted on 12/18/2005 2:52:24 PM PST by bray (Merry Christmas Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
Investigate more than the Times. Investigate who leaked it to the Times.
8 posted on 12/18/2005 2:57:26 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
AMEN!

10 posted on 12/18/2005 2:59:47 PM PST by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

"Obviously, classified information, harmful to the security of the United States and useful to its enemies, was illegally disclosed by one or more government employees. This is a serious matter, bordering on, if not actually constituting treason..."

The Slimes and the Leaker(s) ARE a serious threat to National Security, PERIOD.


14 posted on 12/18/2005 3:08:37 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

Can I get an AMEN.

The leakers and the Times reporter must be lawyer shopping at this point. They should know Bush was not bluffing when he called the leaks illegal.


23 posted on 12/18/2005 3:24:59 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

"Is Time Warner Good For America?"


27 posted on 12/18/2005 3:38:18 PM PST by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

bump


30 posted on 12/18/2005 3:54:19 PM PST by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

The new york times held the story for over 1 year.

According to my calculations, the leak occured late during the '04 campaign. A conincidence?????


35 posted on 12/18/2005 4:15:33 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

The investigation should have begun and been concluded by now, with charges filed.


36 posted on 12/18/2005 4:17:59 PM PST by freema (Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

The DUmmies are cursing the NYT as well, although for not releasing the information. Seems we share something in common with the enemy.


46 posted on 12/18/2005 5:48:49 PM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
Now revelations of secret, although carefully selective, interceptions of suspicious emails and phone calls between persons in the US and terror-connected individuals overseas...

Why was it necessary to do this spying without a warrant? Who determines that necessity? Who, ultimately, takes responsibility should that power be abused?

And a question for FReepers: Would you feel the same way if it was President Clinton?

I support the WoT wholeheartedly, but I also don't lightly give up my Constitutional rights.

49 posted on 12/18/2005 5:59:18 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson