Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
CNET ^ | January 9, 2006 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 01/09/2006 8:57:10 AM PST by MensRightsActivist

It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.

In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annoy; annoying; bush43; darkshearesfault; internet; pests; rino; rkbascornsthislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-349 next last
It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere.
1 posted on 01/09/2006 8:57:12 AM PST by MensRightsActivist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Does this bug you? I'm not touching you. I'm not touching you. Does this bug you?


2 posted on 01/09/2006 8:58:15 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Want to be in 10 years this has morphed into something impacting political speech?


3 posted on 01/09/2006 8:59:43 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

PING!!!!

I know you will want to check this out!


4 posted on 01/09/2006 8:59:55 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.


5 posted on 01/09/2006 9:00:10 AM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
I am about to commit a felony:


6 posted on 01/09/2006 9:00:16 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

WTF?


7 posted on 01/09/2006 9:00:29 AM PST by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

I hope there's no grandfather clause, considering some of the conversations I've had here on FR.


8 posted on 01/09/2006 9:00:43 AM PST by Flightdeck (Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Fortunately InOhio is my last name, so I can be as annoying as I want.
9 posted on 01/09/2006 9:01:17 AM PST by KarlInOhio (What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Does this apply to illegal aliens as well?

(hmmm)
10 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:18 AM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere.

It will selectively enforced to harass, intimidate, and annoy those that can't be prosecuted otherwise.

11 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:51 AM PST by oldbrowser (No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Our esteemed politicians can't seem to grasp this simple point, but the First Amendment protects our right to write something that annoys someone else.

Our "esteemed politicians" aren't the only ones who can't seem to grasp this.
12 posted on 01/09/2006 9:02:53 AM PST by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Unbelievable. I thought this was scrappleface. More free speech infringement.


13 posted on 01/09/2006 9:03:10 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Does this eliminate the MSM's "Unidentified/Unnamed reliable source"?
14 posted on 01/09/2006 9:03:26 AM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

it all depends on what the definition of 'annoying is'. Perspective seems to be the word here.


15 posted on 01/09/2006 9:03:40 AM PST by Palpatine (I'm from Europe, get me out of here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day; Fierce Allegiance; TheBigB; Owl_Eagle; Lazamataz; ...
President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages

I'm putting all of you on report.

16 posted on 01/09/2006 9:04:40 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.

Guess this finishes off the spammers, huh?

NOT!

17 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:07 AM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name.

Now, how do they intend to enforce that? What idiots!

Most people who have any Internet experience use aliases --- several, in fact.

This is another ridiculous nightmare piece of legislation that may look good on paper, but is very impractical in reality.
18 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

You annoyed me. I'm tellin'


19 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:23 AM PST by Crazieman (6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

What, no more ZOTS?


20 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:29 AM PST by Marak (Marco Island)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.

Kinda, Good ol' Scottish Law.
21 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:33 AM PST by BJClinton (Hook 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

"It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere."

They don't take it all at once, it's little by little, bit by bit. And people in America are more concerned about American Idol, or who will be in the Super Bowl than silly issues about rights.
This is not the America I grew up in, and I feel powerless to stop the trend.


22 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:41 AM PST by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Guilty!


23 posted on 01/09/2006 9:06:06 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
I will probably get the Death Penalty!
24 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:04 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

wow, I wish we had this during my quake playing days. a lot of guys sure annoyed me during capture the flag games.


25 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:04 AM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

I retract everything.


26 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:14 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Wanna hear the most annoying sound in the world?


27 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:24 AM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

You're under arrest!


28 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:29 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
more.....from above article:

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.

So in layman's terms if I wanted to annoy you and called you a poopyhead without revealing my true identity, I could go to jail for 2 years? Is this a great country or what? /sarcasm

29 posted on 01/09/2006 9:07:58 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights (GOP, The Other France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

Doing so in person still perfectly legal, and actively encouraged. =)

30 posted on 01/09/2006 9:08:01 AM PST by TheBigB ("barry might make you want to conflate, but i need a tangible nexus here, people!"~~xsmommy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher
Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
31 posted on 01/09/2006 9:08:12 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.

Nope - guess again

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

It seems politicians of all stripes hate free speech
32 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:14 AM PST by The Lumster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marak
What, no more ZOTS?

No. Trolling just comes with stiffer penalties.

33 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:16 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Does this mean the Viking Kitties now have extra-legal powers and authority to address the troll population?

May I suggest DU as nest of pestilence that deserves high placement on the target list?


34 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:26 AM PST by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
 
Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd and Tim Moran annoy the daylights out of me. Helen Thomas of course is in a league of her own... does this law cover people who exasperate people?

35 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:37 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.


36 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:44 AM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.


37 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:51 AM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.


38 posted on 01/09/2006 9:09:57 AM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.


39 posted on 01/09/2006 9:10:04 AM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist
Booga Booga!

Come and get me, coppers! You'll never take me alive!

40 posted on 01/09/2006 9:10:31 AM PST by Ol' Sox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

I know several who annoy me on FR.

This is gonna be fun.


41 posted on 01/09/2006 9:10:35 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

hmmm.. I'm annoyed now, who do I sue?

You, the anonymous poster?

The FCC that permits and "regulates" the networks that this and other varied open dialogue and discourse occur on day in and out?

Congre$$ for even thinking they have a divine right to tell people what they can or can not do or say when it comes to their imposing unreasonable boundaries on all for the excesses of some?


42 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:05 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

Multiple postings annoy me.


43 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:13 AM PST by TheBigB ("barry might make you want to conflate, but i need a tangible nexus here, people!"~~xsmommy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

We are screwn.


44 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:20 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (Chuck Cooperstein is a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; Dashing Dasher

Might as well fit me for the cuffs right now. Every troll since 2000 has probably gotten irritated with the screen name alone.


45 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:23 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Palpatine
it all depends on what the definition of 'annoying is'. Perspective seems to be the word here.

Depends on no such thing.
It is clearly evident that there are miilions of professional annoyees, and they feel entitled to decide what annoys them:

Merry Christmas
God Bless you
God Bless America
In God we trust
Etc.

46 posted on 01/09/2006 9:11:37 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; mikrofon; Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day; Fierce Allegiance; TheBigB; Owl_Eagle; ...
Want to be on my Annoying Ping List? Don't bother to FReepmail me, you're already on it.

BTW, my real name is martin_fierro.

47 posted on 01/09/2006 9:12:05 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (Annoying Ping List master)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MensRightsActivist

Does this apply to FreepMail?


48 posted on 01/09/2006 9:12:05 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

ping


49 posted on 01/09/2006 9:12:11 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
 
I wonder what "Preventing Cyber stalking" will do to neat little features such as Yahoo Alerts?

50 posted on 01/09/2006 9:12:16 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson