Skip to comments.
Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
CNET ^
| January 9, 2006
| Declan McCullagh
Posted on 01/09/2006 8:57:10 AM PST by MensRightsActivist
It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.
In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.
This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: annoy; annoying; bush43; darkshearesfault; internet; pests; rino; rkbascornsthislaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 301-349 next last
It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere.
To: MensRightsActivist
Does this bug you? I'm not touching you. I'm not touching you. Does this bug you?
2
posted on
01/09/2006 8:58:15 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: MensRightsActivist
Want to be in 10 years this has morphed into something impacting political speech?
To: Dashing Dasher
PING!!!!
I know you will want to check this out!
To: SlowBoat407
The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.
5
posted on
01/09/2006 9:00:10 AM PST
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: MensRightsActivist
I am about to commit a felony:
6
posted on
01/09/2006 9:00:16 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: MensRightsActivist
To: MensRightsActivist
I hope there's no grandfather clause, considering some of the conversations I've had here on FR.
8
posted on
01/09/2006 9:00:43 AM PST
by
Flightdeck
(Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
To: MensRightsActivist
Fortunately InOhio is my last name, so I can be as annoying as I want.
9
posted on
01/09/2006 9:01:17 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
To: MensRightsActivist
Does this apply to illegal aliens as well?
(hmmm)
To: MensRightsActivist
It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere. It will selectively enforced to harass, intimidate, and annoy those that can't be prosecuted otherwise.
11
posted on
01/09/2006 9:02:51 AM PST
by
oldbrowser
(No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
To: MensRightsActivist
Our esteemed politicians can't seem to grasp this simple point, but the First Amendment protects our right to write something that annoys someone else.
Our "esteemed politicians" aren't the only ones who can't seem to grasp this.
12
posted on
01/09/2006 9:02:53 AM PST
by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: MensRightsActivist
Unbelievable. I thought this was scrappleface. More free speech infringement.
13
posted on
01/09/2006 9:03:10 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: MensRightsActivist
Does this eliminate the MSM's "Unidentified/Unnamed reliable source"?
To: MensRightsActivist
it all depends on what the definition of 'annoying is'. Perspective seems to be the word here.
15
posted on
01/09/2006 9:03:40 AM PST
by
Palpatine
(I'm from Europe, get me out of here!)
To: Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day; Fierce Allegiance; TheBigB; Owl_Eagle; Lazamataz; ...
President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages I'm putting all of you on report.
To: MensRightsActivist
Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. Guess this finishes off the spammers, huh?
NOT!
17
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:07 AM PST
by
upchuck
(Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
To: MensRightsActivist
In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name.
Now, how do they intend to enforce that? What idiots!
Most people who have any Internet experience use aliases --- several, in fact.
This is another ridiculous nightmare piece of legislation that may look good on paper, but is very impractical in reality.
18
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:21 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: martin_fierro
You annoyed me. I'm tellin'
19
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:23 AM PST
by
Crazieman
(6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
To: mysterio
20
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:29 AM PST
by
Marak
(Marco Island)
To: ANGGAPO
The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.
Kinda, Good ol' Scottish Law.
21
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:33 AM PST
by
BJClinton
(Hook 'em!)
To: MensRightsActivist
"It appears this new law has the potential to make criminals of bloggers everywhere."
They don't take it all at once, it's little by little, bit by bit. And people in America are more concerned about American Idol, or who will be in the Super Bowl than silly issues about rights.
This is not the America I grew up in, and I feel powerless to stop the trend.
22
posted on
01/09/2006 9:05:41 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: martin_fierro
To: MensRightsActivist
I will probably get the Death Penalty!
24
posted on
01/09/2006 9:07:04 AM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: MensRightsActivist
wow, I wish we had this during my quake playing days. a lot of guys sure annoyed me during capture the flag games.
25
posted on
01/09/2006 9:07:04 AM PST
by
isom35
To: MensRightsActivist
To: MensRightsActivist
Wanna hear the most annoying sound in the world?
27
posted on
01/09/2006 9:07:24 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: Flightdeck
28
posted on
01/09/2006 9:07:29 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: MensRightsActivist
more.....from above article:
To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.
The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.
So in layman's terms if I wanted to annoy you and called you a poopyhead without revealing my true identity, I could go to jail for 2 years? Is this a great country or what? /sarcasm
To: martin_fierro
Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. Doing so in person still perfectly legal, and actively encouraged. =)
30
posted on
01/09/2006 9:08:01 AM PST
by
TheBigB
("barry might make you want to conflate, but i need a tangible nexus here, people!"~~xsmommy)
To: Dashing Dasher
Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."
To: ANGGAPO
The bill is sponsored yo the Democrats no doubt.
Nope - guess again
To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.
It seems politicians of all stripes hate free speech
To: Marak
What, no more ZOTS?No. Trolling just comes with stiffer penalties.
33
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:16 AM PST
by
houeto
(Mr. President, close our borders now!)
To: MensRightsActivist
Does this mean the Viking Kitties now have extra-legal powers and authority to address the troll population?
May I suggest DU as nest of pestilence that deserves high placement on the target list?
34
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:26 AM PST
by
T-Bird45
To: MensRightsActivist

Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd and Tim Moran annoy the daylights out of me. Helen Thomas of course is in a league of her own... does this law cover people who exasperate people?
|
|
35
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:37 AM PST
by
HawaiianGecko
(Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
To: MensRightsActivist
The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.
36
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:44 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: MensRightsActivist
The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.
37
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:51 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: MensRightsActivist
The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.
38
posted on
01/09/2006 9:09:57 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: MensRightsActivist
The war on annoying has been declared? THE INTERWEB IS DOOMED.
39
posted on
01/09/2006 9:10:04 AM PST
by
M203M4
To: MensRightsActivist
Booga Booga!
Come and get me, coppers! You'll never take me alive!
40
posted on
01/09/2006 9:10:31 AM PST
by
Ol' Sox
To: MensRightsActivist
I know several who annoy me on FR.
This is gonna be fun.
41
posted on
01/09/2006 9:10:35 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: MensRightsActivist
hmmm.. I'm annoyed now, who do I sue?
You, the anonymous poster?
The FCC that permits and "regulates" the networks that this and other varied open dialogue and discourse occur on day in and out?
Congre$$ for even thinking they have a divine right to tell people what they can or can not do or say when it comes to their imposing unreasonable boundaries on all for the excesses of some?
42
posted on
01/09/2006 9:11:05 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: M203M4
Multiple postings annoy me.
43
posted on
01/09/2006 9:11:13 AM PST
by
TheBigB
("barry might make you want to conflate, but i need a tangible nexus here, people!"~~xsmommy)
To: MensRightsActivist
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; Dashing Dasher
Might as well fit me for the cuffs right now. Every troll since 2000 has probably gotten irritated with the screen name alone.
45
posted on
01/09/2006 9:11:23 AM PST
by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat)
To: Palpatine
it all depends on what the definition of 'annoying is'. Perspective seems to be the word here.Depends on no such thing.
It is clearly evident that there are miilions of professional annoyees, and they feel entitled to decide what annoys them:
Merry Christmas
God Bless you
God Bless America
In God we trust
Etc.
46
posted on
01/09/2006 9:11:37 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: martin_fierro; mikrofon; Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day; Fierce Allegiance; TheBigB; Owl_Eagle; ...
Want to be on my
Annoying Ping List? Don't bother to FReepmail me, you're already on it.
BTW, my real name is martin_fierro.
To: MensRightsActivist
Does this apply to FreepMail?
48
posted on
01/09/2006 9:12:05 AM PST
by
Mojave
To: Eaker
49
posted on
01/09/2006 9:12:11 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

I wonder what "Preventing Cyber stalking" will do to neat little features such as Yahoo Alerts?
|
|
50
posted on
01/09/2006 9:12:16 AM PST
by
HawaiianGecko
(Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 301-349 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson