Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran issues stark warning on oil price
The Guardian ^ | January 16, 2006 | Robert Trait

Posted on 01/16/2006 2:20:31 AM PST by mcg2000

War of words over trade sanctions Iran stepped up its defiance of international pressure over its nuclear programme yesterday by warning of soaring oil prices if it is subjected to economic sanctions. As diplomats from the US, Europe, Russia, and China prepared to meet today in London to discuss referring Tehran to the UN security council, Iran's economy minister, Davoud Danesh-Jafari, said the country's position as the world's fourth-largest oil producer meant such action would have grave consequences. "Any possible sanctions from the west could possibly, by disturbing Iran's political and economic situation, raise oil prices beyond levels the west expects," he told Iranian state radio. In a provocative move, Iran also announced plans yesterday to convene a "scientific" conference to examine the evidence supporting the Holocaust. The news comes weeks after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad provoked a global outcry by describing the slaughter of 6 million Jews by the Nazis in the second world war as a "myth". Mr Danesh-Jafari's comments echoed fears voiced by energy market analysts after crude oil prices last week rose above $64 (£36.50) a barrel as hopes faded of a diplomatic solution to the dispute. Last week, Manouchehr Takin, of the Centre for Global Energy Studies, argued that crude prices could hit $100 a barrel if Iran stopped exporting. "Supply and demand are very tightly balanced," he said. Mr Danesh-Jafari's warning added weight to veiled threats by Iran's president on Saturday. Iran had a "cheap means" of achieving its nuclear "rights", Mr Ahmadinejad said, adding: "You [the west] need us more than we need you. All of you today need the Iranian nation." Recognising the danger,

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Business/Economy; Canada; Cuba; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Germany; Israel; Japan; Mexico; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; islam; middleeast; muslim; nuclear; oil; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2006 2:20:34 AM PST by mcg2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
World War 2 in reverse. Natural resources the world needs and being held hostage by tinpot dictators.

Time to get the Cav in there and clean house, or let the Israelis do it for us, but this regime has got to go....and soon.

2 posted on 01/16/2006 2:28:04 AM PST by Pistolshot (Condi 2008.<------added January 2004. Remember you heard it here first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

You'd think after that we did to Saddam, these morons mullahs in Iran would think twice before daring us to go in there.


3 posted on 01/16/2006 2:40:34 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

Eh, Walking will do us some good.


4 posted on 01/16/2006 2:41:15 AM PST by Hong Kong Expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Expect Chavez to turn off the spigot at the same time that Iran does. Bet they plan to crash the world economy.


5 posted on 01/16/2006 2:48:01 AM PST by Marak (chuckles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marak

"Expect Chavez to turn off the spigot at the same time that Iran does. Bet they plan to crash the world economy."

Expect Chavez to have an "accident" like falling down the stairs and braking his neck.


6 posted on 01/16/2006 2:52:04 AM PST by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

This is mild, Iran warns to cause oil prices to rise. Think of the warnings and demands they'll be after this decades long, terror sponsoring state obtains nuclear weapon capabilities.


7 posted on 01/16/2006 2:54:09 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

This should be fun.


8 posted on 01/16/2006 2:54:20 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce
Expect Chavez to have an "accident" like falling down the stairs and braking his neck.

How about putting him in a cell with Manuel Noriega and let them play Brokeback Mountain?

9 posted on 01/16/2006 2:54:40 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Iran does seem to be bothered by even the vague threat of sanctions. They really, really need to sell oil IMO.


10 posted on 01/16/2006 2:55:02 AM PST by agere_contra (Protectionism is Socialism - it's welfare for uncompetitive people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: mcg2000
I wonder if it has occurred to these nutjobs that with over 130,000 well=armed Americans next door, it would be nothing for us to make a slight detour, induce a "regime change" and simply take the oil if that suits our fancy.

Of course, the liklihood of us doing that is about 0%, but the potential, remote as it is, still exists.
12 posted on 01/16/2006 2:59:43 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Iran cannot unilaterally cease production and achieve the amount of income it requires to keep the nation on its feet.

All it is doing is cutting its own income unless other oil states choose to cooperate with Iran.


13 posted on 01/16/2006 3:01:27 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
"Any possible sanctions from the west could possibly, by disturbing Iran's political and economic situation, raise oil prices beyond levels the west expects,"

In that case, forget about economic sanctions, and go with a military option. Within an hour we can have a new and more reasonable government in Iran.
14 posted on 01/16/2006 3:03:05 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marak
Expect Chavez to turn off the spigot at the same time that Iran does. Bet they plan to crash the world economy.

Yep! An in a millitary conflict it will be quite likely that the Iranians mine the Gulf of Hormuz (=> No oil from Kuweit, Iraq and parts of Saudi Arabia). I would do that if I were the Iranian commander in chief.

This is one of the reasons why all of our politicians are that careful when they talk about the use of millitary force. Furthermore I believe that they could be conquered but it will take much more efforts than we can imagine. To neutralize their nuclear ability you need "boots on the ground". Just a simple airstrike will not help. Therefore it would be good if the West would stand united instead of splintering up like in the recent Iraq crisis. *uck Chirac.

15 posted on 01/16/2006 3:04:16 AM PST by Atlantic Bridge (O tempora! O mores!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

"You [the west] need us more than we need you. All of you today need the Iranian nation."

This guy is a megalomaniac!


16 posted on 01/16/2006 3:08:16 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

It's a good thing we have all those US troops in Iraq to make sure some oil gets on US bound supertankers now eh?

Iraq was a mistake tho wasn't it? Wasn't it?

As I posted back in April of 2004 ( http://freerepublic.info/focus/f-bloggers/1121399/posts ) there was a lot of reasons to go into Iraq besides WMDs and we're about to start finding out a few of them if the situation in Iran keeps moving in the current direction.


17 posted on 01/16/2006 3:10:08 AM PST by pcx99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Iran cannot unilaterally cease production and achieve the amount of income it requires to keep the nation on its feet.

Our friends from China and India are happy to buy every single drop of oil. No matter if it comes from the Vatican, Israel, North Korea or - Iran.

The world made a basic mistake when they allowed other countries like the nuclear 5 to own and process nuclear warheads.

18 posted on 01/16/2006 3:12:16 AM PST by Atlantic Bridge (O tempora! O mores!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pcx99

If we light up Iran it will free up all kinds of energy supplies.


19 posted on 01/16/2006 3:12:28 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (http://www.busateripens.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
If we light up Iran it will free up all kinds of energy supplies.

We might even begin a little closer to home with Chavez and Fidel.
20 posted on 01/16/2006 3:15:27 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson