Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saint Hillary
IBD ^ | 1/25/2006 | Not Identified

Posted on 01/25/2006 5:53:18 PM PST by Laverne

Ethics In Government: Hillary Clinton is on a personal jihad against what she calls the Republican-led "culture of corruption and cronyism" in Washington. Corruption? Cronyism? She's one to talk. It's hard to think of a more unqualified candidate for Girl Scout of Washington. But Hillary, queen of the Arkansas mafia, has appointed herself to that role in this, the next stage of her pre-2008 media makeover.

The rehabilitation is complete: Meet St. Hillary, defender of all that is right and decent. Yes, she's almost ready to seize power again — if, that is, she can get away with the con. But once a phony, always a phony. And Hillary has really outdone herself in the hypocrisy department this time. Instead of pointing out the speck in the eyes of her colleagues across the aisle, she should worry about removing the log in her own.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; corruption; hillary; hrh; hypocrit; queenbee

1 posted on 01/25/2006 5:53:19 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Don't Dem fools have any sense of irony whatsoever? Between her and the senior blob from Massive2sh!tts.....


2 posted on 01/25/2006 5:59:46 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

BUMP!

She wants to return to the White House, and will do so in any way she can, aided and abetted by the media types who adore her.


3 posted on 01/25/2006 6:01:38 PM PST by Theresawithanh (Always remember that you're unique. Just like everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Looks like this is one for you


4 posted on 01/25/2006 6:02:16 PM PST by misterrob (Democrats, The Party of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Pretty amazing isn't it.


5 posted on 01/25/2006 6:02:26 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

the next thing is going to be that the bush family killed vince foster.


6 posted on 01/25/2006 6:06:43 PM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Image hosting by Photobucket
7 posted on 01/25/2006 6:19:10 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Hillary is a hypocrite?

This is "breaking" "news"?

:-)

8 posted on 01/25/2006 6:20:46 PM PST by manwiththehands (Good news for America = bad news for democRats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes; RichInOC

the pig in a pants suit can never get elected.


9 posted on 01/25/2006 6:23:15 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

51%, Honey. 51% of Americans wouldn't vote for you if you were running against Simon Cowell. What you do or say JUST DOESN'T MATTER. Get it? Now go look for a real job.


10 posted on 01/25/2006 6:25:36 PM PST by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts

...Or Simon Legree either (considering her "plantation" mentality).


11 posted on 01/25/2006 6:27:57 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts

I was watching Hardball tonight, and they were (Chris and some other liberal weenie) were saying the poll about Hillary was meaningless. They actually said that her numbers were like this because she didn't have good name recognition! LOL


12 posted on 01/25/2006 6:30:02 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
I was watching Hardball tonight, and they were (Chris and some other liberal weenie) were saying the poll about Hillary was meaningless. They actually said that her numbers were like this because she didn't have good name recognition! LOL

They are almost right...it wasn't good name recognition, it was bad name recognition. She didn't get the "she-who-should-not-be-mentioned" moniker for nothin'.

13 posted on 01/25/2006 6:41:41 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
don't forget where 'she' came from....
--

get some popcorn, sit back, and make sure the tin foil is snug... I'm gonna spin a tale...(try to not skip ahead)

The date, sometime before summer 1998. Imagine you are politically hyper-active, power hungry, and love the life style afforded the highest office in the land. You realize it will all end in 2.5 years, at which point you will be pushed to the side. This just won't do. You are HRClinton, what's your next step?

You have all your friends in the media begging you to run, but you have never held office, any office, at any level. You aren't stupid and know you'd never make it. Therefore, you will have to hold some high level office in 2000. So that rules out running for POTUS in 2000. 2004 would also be out since you'd only be a freshman. You know you'll have to serve one successful term without controversy and without pissing off too many people.

This leaves you with 2008 and 2012. 2012 would be out since you'd be getting even longer in the tooth and the shine would be too far off the apple (being as nice as possible here) to sell. Therefore, 2008 it is.

No problem. If a democrat wins in 2000, he'd run again in 2004. If he wins in 2004, his running mate would be tossed to the 2nd seat again in 2008, if you put your hat in the ring. If he loses in 2004, you're set for an uncontested shot at 2008 top slot.

Only a democrat loss in 2000 causes problems, because you'd have to insure a democrat loss in 2004. This could be accomplished after the DNC in July 2004 by reduced or unflattering news coverage. Potentially leaking of damaging information (which you have, of course) would also insure a democrat loss in 2004.

So... you have it all set. You figure it's a no brainer. You only have to pick the type of high level office you want. This leaves governor, senate, or congress. Congress doesn't yield enough power. Governor's do a lot of work, and run the higher risk of pissing people off. That leaves the Senate. Powerful, low risk, most people don't even know their senators. Therefore, senator clinton it is. Next question, which state? Has to be a big, powerful state with the possibility of getting in. The 4 most powerful states would be (in no particular order): Texas, California, New York, and Florida. Texas and Florida are off the ticket right away. California is unlikely, and that leaves New York. No problem.

So the only thing you need to do is buy a house in New York.

Then the unthinkable. Someone has the gaul to actually suggest they want to run for the same seat! YOUR seat! This person can't just be dismissed, unlike the others. This one is a democrat! And he's well respected by democrats AND republicans! Whoa! This isn't good. He's well liked by all demographics. He has actually had a successful business in New York and the people genuinely like him. Worse still, the media loves him... they swoon all over him!

This cannot be allowed to stop *US*, the co-presidents! How dare he?!

The question: You're HRClinton, what do you do?

Yes, we have all heard the term 'arkan-cide'.. and you've deflected all the stories in the passed, what's one more? This guy even flies a personal airplane (what was he thinking?!). No problem.

Question: Who do you think that 'pretender' was?  

 

 

JFK Jr.  

 

 

Remember, they were found, all three of them, still in the plane. None of them even tried to unbuckle their belts. My guess, something in their drinks to help them sleep.


14 posted on 01/25/2006 6:52:48 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

Wow ...thats enough to make you go ...hmmmmm


15 posted on 01/25/2006 7:10:49 PM PST by sawmill trash (You declare jihad ... we declare DEGUELLO !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

Yes, this is why we must all start to refer to her as MRS. BILL CLINTON.

The general populace needs to be reminded at all times of the "ick factor" and that voting for her is still the infamous Klintoon two-fer---Bubba and the Beast, together again (although in separate wings at the White House).

No wonder Algore is reinventing himself as the bearer of Rat party warm and fuzzies these days.


16 posted on 01/25/2006 8:03:58 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

I would go for sainthood for Hillary. It is my understanding that, in the Catholic Church, sainthood can only be granted posthumously.


17 posted on 01/25/2006 8:06:54 PM PST by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Thanx. The topic actually anticipates my next post. ;)


18 posted on 01/26/2006 1:24:49 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laverne; misterrob; All

Allow us to refresh the scandalous record, starting with her central role in Travelgate. This, you'll recall, was one of the first in the parade of scandals we know as the Clinton administration.

There is fresh evidence that Hillary ordered the purge of career White House Travel Office officials to make room for the Clintons' cronies from Arkansas -- and used the FBI and IRS to persecute those innocent workers.

New details of her involvement come from the FBI official who wrote the Travelgate report to Congress. I.C. Smith, head of the bureau's Arkansas field office at the time, calls "absurd" Hillary's claims that she had only a limited role in the affair.

"It was Hillary Clinton's former Rose Law Firm partners, Vince Foster and Bill Kennedy, who were obviously feeling the pressure" to frame Travel Office chief Billy Dale and others who got in the way. "Combine that with the appearance of longtime Hillary confidantes Bernard Nussbaum and Patsy Thomasson on the scene, and it was clear to me that Hillary was the one applying the pressure."

In the end, "the allegations of misconduct by loyal, longtime employees was of the White House's making and was ultimately unsubstantiated," Smith says in his memoir, "Inside: A Top G-Man Exposes Spies, Lies, and Bureaucratic Bungling Inside the FBI."

It took a pro-Clinton D.C. jury only a short while to find Dale innocent of all the charges the White House had trumped up against him.But the damage was done -- Hillary had ruined his career and his life, and still has offered no apologies to him or his family. And yet she now proclaims to be the avenger of victims of cronyism.

hillary talks:
ON TRAVEL OFFICE

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

Oh yes, she also says she's fighting against cover-ups. Hmm. Maybe she can finally explain one of her own -- namely, how her billing records went missing while under subpoena in the Whitewater probe.

hillary talks:
On White House Coverups

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)


Investors Business Daily
Issues & Insights
Saint Hillary
Posted 1/25/2006


SEE VIDEO: "HILLARY IS 'DOOMED'" (more 'plantation' fallout)


GONE WITH THE WIND
(miss hillary's 'plantation' blunder)


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.


IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)



REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT


HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK


ROCKEFELLER SEDITION: WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS?


THE ABSURDITY OF A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY


CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS:
Justice Undone in the clinton White House


clintonCORRUPTION: the more things change. . . .


IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006


19 posted on 01/26/2006 1:56:10 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne; D.P.Roberts
The HARDBALL transcript, etc.

ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
THE ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT




20 posted on 01/26/2006 5:34:25 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson