Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Chief Says Wiretap Disclosure Damaging (Democrats nervous)
Associated Press ^ | 2 Feb 06 | KATHERINE SHRADER

Posted on 02/02/2006 10:50:14 AM PST by SkyPilot

WASHINGTON - CIA Director Porter Goss said Thursday that the disclosure of President Bush's eavesdropping-without-warrants program and other once-secret projects had undermined U.S. intelligence-gathering abilities.

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told the Senate Intelligence Committee. He said a federal grand jury should be empaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."

His testimony came after National Intelligence Director John Negroponte, who directs all intelligence activities, strongly defended the program, calling it crucial for protecting the nation against its most menacing threat.

"This was not about domestic surveillance," Negroponte said.

Leaders of the nation's intelligence agencies appeared before the panel in a rare public session to give a rundown on threats facing the world.

Negroponte called al-Qaida and associated terror groups the "top concern" of the U.S. intelligence community, followed closely by the nuclear activities of Iran and North Korea.

Committee Democrats sought to change the focus to the president's decision to authorize the National Security Agency to eavesdrop — without first obtaining warrants — on communications to and from those in the United States and terror suspects abroad.

"The president has not only confirmed the existence of the program, he has spoken at length about it repeatedly," while keeping Congress in the dark, said Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the panel's senior Democrat.

"The administration wants to have it both ways," said Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich.

Goss complained that leaks to the news media about the surveillance program and activities such as reported CIA secret prisons abroad had damaged his own agency's work.

CIA Director Porter Goss, and FBI Director Robert Mueller, right, talk as they prepare for the U.S. Select Committee on Intelligence hearing to examine the world threat, on Capitol Hill, Thursday, Feb. 2, 2006 in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) Email Photo Print Photo

"I use the words `very severe' intentionally. And I think the evidence will show that," Goss said.

He said not only have these revelations made it harder for the CIA to gather information, but they have made intelligence agencies in other countries mistrustful of their U.S. counterparts.

"I'm stunned to the quick when I get questions from my professional counterparts saying, `Mr. Goss, can't you Americans keep a secret?'" he said.

Goss cited a "disruption to our plans, things that we have under way." Some CIA sources and "assets" had been rendered "no longer viable or usable, or less effective by a large degree," he said.

"I also believe that there has been an erosion of the culture of secrecy and we're trying to reinstall that," Goss said.

"I've called in the FBI, the Department of Justice. It is my aim and it is my hope that we will witness a grand jury investigation with reporters present, being asked to reveal who is leaking this information," he said.

Rockefeller suggested that the "leaks" Goss talked about most likely "came from the executive branch" of the government.

That brought a terse response from FBI Director Robert Mueller, who said, "It's not fair to point a finger as to the responsibility of the leak."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaida; cia; cialeak; democrats; enemywithin; espionage; fifthcolumn; intelligence; leaking; leaks; nationalsecurity; nsa; nsaleak; portergoss; rattreason; rattricks; rockerfeller; spying; topsecret; traitor; treason; unamerican; waronterror; waronterrorism; wiretapping; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-202 next last
To: nuffsenuff
I can't believe he had the gall to say that he thinks it leaked from the Executive Branch...

Planting the seed in the media's minds, so that when someone finally tells us in plain English that "Senator Rockefeller's eagerness to share secrets with the New York Times in order to score political points against President Bush got some of our boys killed in Iraq and Afghanistan," he can claim that the story of his misdeeds is being exaggerated as a form of retaliation by the Administration.

101 posted on 02/02/2006 1:28:13 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
(Democrats nervous)

They should be. But if it was a pubbie, off to jail with them too.....

102 posted on 02/02/2006 1:29:11 PM PST by b4its2late (Hard work never killed anyone, but why chance it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
The RATs are squirmin' now!

Why? They get away with everything.
As for Jay (the-executive-branch-did-it) Rockefeller, I think he doth protest too much. Regardless, he's another one who's gotten away with HUGE leaks (e.g., revealing black ops plans) in the past. He has nothing to worry about. Slaps on the wrist (if doled out at all) don't hurt that much and certainly are no deterrent to his determined goal of undermining our security.
103 posted on 02/02/2006 1:31:33 PM PST by Pirate21 ("Leadership is about action, not just position." - Lord Taylor of Warwick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Anyone see E-Ring last night? It displayed how this type of surveillance works. Really neat.
104 posted on 02/02/2006 1:44:21 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The differences between this and the Valerie Plame "leaks" are rather stark....


105 posted on 02/02/2006 1:48:17 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Just for fun, I'll copy this and put it in my calendar. My bet is nothing will come of this - ever.

Don't forget about the severe penalties that Sandy Berger suffered when he was caught stealing classified documents. /sarcasm

106 posted on 02/02/2006 1:52:08 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
If nothing else, James Risen is a slam dunk accessory to the crime -- the identity of his source(s) is irrelevant to the fact that Mr. Risen purposely published what he knew to be secret.

His plea bargaining sessions should be fruitful.....

107 posted on 02/02/2006 1:58:25 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Maybe Risen can ask for a pardon from President Bush?


108 posted on 02/02/2006 2:02:02 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

bttt


109 posted on 02/02/2006 2:03:46 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Interesting that the underlined portion was outside the quotes...


110 posted on 02/02/2006 2:12:14 PM PST by pgyanke (Christ has a tolerance for sinners; liberals have a tolerance for sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

That's out of the dems playbook. Always point the finger at others. When in fact, they're the ones. Oh how many times have we seen the 'toons' do this very thing.


111 posted on 02/02/2006 2:24:04 PM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

agreed


112 posted on 02/02/2006 2:27:13 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Anyone see E-Ring last night? It displayed how this type of surveillance works. Really neat.

Love the show. How about monitoring the NYT's. GREAT.
Great scene with the LT(yes he was promoted)arguing with the Ambassador of Spain. Loved the threat.

113 posted on 02/02/2006 2:33:55 PM PST by fedupjohn (If we try to fight the war on terror with eyes shut + ears packed with wax, innocent people will die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: handy old one

""The president has not only confirmed the existence of the program, he has spoken at length about it repeatedly," while keeping Congress in the dark, said Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia,"

Sen. Jay Rockefeller... GUILTY!


114 posted on 02/02/2006 2:38:25 PM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach
This is one I simply can not understand! The investigation should be on who is breeching National Security by leaking this stuff to the leftist media? Where is Bush? Where are the GOP leaders?
115 posted on 02/02/2006 2:59:14 PM PST by Cindy_Cin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Hey? Isn't that the same Technique USA Today used on a front page picture Of Condi Rice? **wink**
116 posted on 02/02/2006 3:00:23 PM PST by Cindy_Cin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Mo1

The replay

08:19 PM EST
3:35
Senate Committee
World-Wide Threats
Select Intelligence Committee


Roberts, Pat, U.S. Senator, R-KS
Mueller, Robert, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Goss, Porter, Director, Central Intelligence Agency
Rodley, Carol, Principal Dep. Asst. Secretary, Department of State, Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Negroponte, John D., Director, Office of National Intelligence
Hayden, Michael V., Principal Deputy Director, Office of National Intelligence
Allen, Charles E., Chief Intelligence Officer, Department of Homeland Security, Office of Intelligence and Analysis
Maples, Michael D., Director, Defense Intelligence Agency


117 posted on 02/02/2006 3:07:14 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cindy_Cin
Nah... they used 'Hue/Saturation' and 'colorized'.

I just 'distorted' her eyeballs and mouth. The 'brain' on her forehead was applied with 60% opacity.

Here's one of Nasty Pelosi...


118 posted on 02/02/2006 3:09:48 PM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

thanks!


119 posted on 02/02/2006 3:33:17 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Yikes!


120 posted on 02/02/2006 4:07:46 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson