Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jed Babbin: Rockefeller IS the source of the leak on the NSA wiretaps..will he take a polygraph?
John Batchelor program..WABC radio

Posted on 02/03/2006 8:47:20 PM PST by ken5050

Turned on the radio, happened to catch the last segment of the John Batchelor show. He was interviewing Jeb Babbin....who many of us know and respect, and read his columns. I was absolutely stunned by what Babbin just said...hadn't seen/heard it anywheres..and thought it merits reposting for your benefit....


TOPICS: US: West Virginia; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; babbin; batchelor; jayrockefeller; jedbabbin; johnbatchelor; leaks; nsa; spying; talkradio; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-240 next last
To: Philistone

make him spend some of that money


61 posted on 02/03/2006 9:15:07 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Amazing that in this day and age, one could contemplate a sitting Senator undermining a nation's security--one could could practically go on national television, admit he did it, and have no repercussions. Heck, Sandy Berger should be in prison, and he's not.

This is the kind of stuff that eventually has people effictively remove their consent from those empowered to govern.

62 posted on 02/03/2006 9:15:32 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
He's too cerebrally limited to be an accomplished liar.
63 posted on 02/03/2006 9:15:39 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Monday...I'll do a live thread..


64 posted on 02/03/2006 9:15:42 PM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Rich Rocky needs to be down in his West VA working
on the mine problems instead of undercutting Bush on
the war


65 posted on 02/03/2006 9:17:30 PM PST by SoCalPol (Cowards Cut and Run, Marines Never Do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

No one's above the law. Rockefeller should pay the same price anyone else would pay. If he did the crime, he can do the time...


66 posted on 02/03/2006 9:17:34 PM PST by GOPJ (President Bush to Democrats: "Hindsight is not wisdom. Second-guessing is not strategy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; Howlin
He did say however, that any senator or Congressional staffer that holds a security clearance can be asked at any time to take a polygraph. The individual can of course refuse to take the test, but failure to do so is reason to remove that person's security clearance.

Is this written in the rules??

Because at the hearing yesterday .. After a few stern words to the Dems with regard to their questions ... Pat Roberts mention the FBI asking members (I think last year) to take one and that Roberts thought it was an insult

I thought it was odd that he brought that up

67 posted on 02/03/2006 9:18:07 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; ASA Vet; HiJinx; beyond the sea; Rembrandt
Usual suspects ...Ping


What happens to a US Senator who violates National Secrets Act?
68 posted on 02/03/2006 9:18:27 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Order of Battle: Sink or capture as Prize, MS Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

"Intelligence tests? Fertility tests? What are you looking for?"

Wasserman test - it would explain the insanity, at least...


69 posted on 02/03/2006 9:18:48 PM PST by decal (Too many people mistake "tolerance" for "approval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol


He really needs to get the hell out of politics.


70 posted on 02/03/2006 9:19:29 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Types of security clearances:

The scope of investigative work needed to grant a security clearance depends on the level of clearance being requested. There are three basic levels of security classification:

CONFIDENTIAL:
This refers to material, which, if improperly disclosed, could be reasonably expected to cause some measurable damage to the national security. The vast majority of military personnel are given this very basic level of clearance. This level needs to be reinvestigated every fifteen years.*
SECRET:
The unauthorized disclosure of secret information could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security. This level is reinvestigated every ten years.*
TOP SECRET:
Individuals with this clearance have access to information or material that could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security if it was released without authorization. This level needs to be reinvestigated every five years.*
* Reinvestigations are more important than the original investigation because those individuals who have held clearances longer are more likely to be working with increasingly critical information.


http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:ULkZiSLNOnoJ:www.taonline.com/securityclearances/+types+of+security+clearances+code&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1


71 posted on 02/03/2006 9:19:49 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I heard tonight that the committee told Gonzalez to plan on being there all day on Monday.


72 posted on 02/03/2006 9:19:59 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: zook

I'll have to check the Bush Manual of New Tone but I'm pretty sure Rockefeller could endorse assassination and the President would find a reason to overlook it. "Folks get upset. I appreciate that."


73 posted on 02/03/2006 9:21:01 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Are polygraph (lie detector) tests required?

The use of the polygraph for any Department of Defense program is governed by DoD Directive 5210.48 and DoD Regulation 5320.48R.

A polygraph examination is mandatory for employment by or assignment to the DSS and the National Security Agency (NSA) and for assignment (or loan) of DoD personnel to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ). It is also mandatory for some SCI and SAP access programs.

Additionally, the polygraph may be used for any other personnel security investigations to resolve serious credible derogatory information and then only with consent. No adverse action may be taken solely on the basis of a polygraph examination that indicates deception, except upon the written finding by the Secretary or Under Secretary of Defense, or a Secretary of one of the military departments, that the classified information in question is of such extreme sensitivity that access under the circumstances poses an unacceptable risk to the national security.

Polygraph examinations may also be used to supplement investigations of federal felonies, of unauthorized disclosure of classified information or of alleged acts of terrorism, or when requested by the subject of a personnel security investigation, for exculpation with respect to allegations arising in the investigation.

The DoD regulation details the exact manner in which the examination must be conducted. No relevant question may be asked during the polygraph examination that has not been reviewed with the person to be examined before the examination, and all questions must have a special relevance to the inquiry. Certain "validating" questions may be asked without prior disclosure to establish a baseline from which the examiners can judge the validity of the answers to the relevant questions. The probing of a person's thoughts or beliefs, or questions on subjects that are not directly relevant to the investigation, such as religious or political beliefs or beliefs and opinions about racial matters, are prohibited.

again: http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:ULkZiSLNOnoJ:www.taonline.com/securityclearances/+types+of+security+clearances+code&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1


74 posted on 02/03/2006 9:21:09 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ken5050


Monday. Hmmmmmm. I guess I'll change my Monday plans to Tuesday.


75 posted on 02/03/2006 9:21:35 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: onyx

He really needs to get the hell out of politics.

and that too.
He is such a smug SOB


76 posted on 02/03/2006 9:21:52 PM PST by SoCalPol (Cowards Cut and Run, Marines Never Do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MoodyBlu

Thanks for confirming..weren't you stunned also..? I was blown away..<>
...I caught AGAG on Brit's today, and he looked like the proverbial cat that swallowed the canary...very confident..and as I said..Babbin , IMHO would not be going public with this unless encouraged to do so...there's more afoot here..I expect..happily..


77 posted on 02/03/2006 9:22:26 PM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Did you ever notice that Rockefeller always looks guilty or like he is hiding something? I am serious, his demeanor and body language make him look like a Dog that peed on the carpet. Leahy has the same problem, he always looks guilty,but he probably did pee on the Carpet.


78 posted on 02/03/2006 9:23:07 PM PST by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol


LOL -- and arrogant as well.


79 posted on 02/03/2006 9:23:16 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Types of security clearances

There are others above those on the list.
80 posted on 02/03/2006 9:25:47 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Order of Battle: Sink or capture as Prize, MS Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson