Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional Report On Katrina: First Look
Popular Mechanics ^ | 2/15/06

Posted on 02/16/2006 1:14:09 AM PST by Straight Vermonter

2:00 this afternoon, the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina will release its final report after more than five months of investigation. POPULAR MECHANICS obtained excerpts of a draft copy of the report last night.

We've given the report an initial read and found it riddled with poor logic, internal contradictions and exaggerations. This is no 9/11 Commission Report. We’ll have a fuller review once we get our hands on the official copy.

Also, here's our March cover story, "Now What? The Lessons of Katrina," an investigative analysis and myth-debunking of this natural disaster.

While the 9/11 effort pinpointed large institutional problems and focused on solutions, this report seems designed to narrow attention onto a few individuals, ignoring larger, and frankly more important, issues—such as what role FEMA should actually take in large-scale emergencies.

For now, though, here’s a quick overview of what seems to be the report’s most troubling shortfall: consistently blaming individuals for failing to foresee circumstances that only became clear with the laser-sharp vision of hindsight.

For example, the report states:

"Fifty-six hours prior to landfall, Hurricane Katrina presented an extremely high probability threat that 75 percent of New Orleans would be flooded, tens of thousands of residents may be killed, hundreds of thousands trapped in flood waters up to 20 feet, hundreds of thousands of homes and other structures destroyed, a million people evacuated from their homes, and the greater New Orleans area would be rendered uninhabitable for several months or years."

This statistic is referred to often, and refers to computer modeling of a direct Category 5 hurricane landfall in New Orleans. However, it's also a distortion. According to the data the Committee itself examined, 56 hours prior to landfall, Katrina was a relatively weak Category 3 storm, heading west in the Gulf of Mexico. Over the next few hours, it began its turn north, but where the storm was going to make landfall along the Gulf Coast was any weatherman's bet (the average 48-hour margin of error is 160 miles). In fact, it was not until the next day, Saturday, that it became more of a certainty that the hurricane was heading toward New Orleans. Furthermore, hurricane forecasters and emergency managers tell PM that until about 24 hours before landfall, hurricanes are too unpredictable to warrant the sort of blanket evacuation orders the report describes.

And according to transcripts obtained by POPULAR MECHANICS of the Sunday, August 28, videoconference between FEMA, DHS, Gulf State authorities, the National Weather Service and the White House, as late as Sunday—only 24 hours before landfall—National Hurricane Center storm tracks predicted: "There will be minimal flooding in the city of New Orleans itself." The death tolls listed in the congressional report presuppose: A) certainty that the storm would hit New Orleans directly, and B) certainty the storm would strengthen to a Category 4 or 5. Neither of these propositions was certain 56 hours prior to landfall. And, in fact, the hurricane was a Category 3 storm when it did hit.

The Committee report also criticizes the DHS and FEMA for not including the Department of Defense in their pre-storm and immediate post-storm planning. However, the same August 28 transcript shows that DoD was included from the beginning. In reality, despite organizational shortcomings, the rescue spearheaded by the National Guard and the Coast Guard turned out to be the largest and fastest in U.S. history, mobilizing nearly 100,000 responders within three days of the hurricane’s landfall. While each of the 1072 deaths in Louisiana was a tragedy, the worst-case scenario death toll would have been 60,000. Here's an excerpt from the August 28 transcript:

SECRETARY CHERTOFF: (Inaudible.) Yes. Hi, this is Secretary Chertoff. And, again, as it relates to the entire department, if there's anything that you need from Coast Guard or any other components that you're not getting, please let us know. We'll do that for you, OK.

MIKE BROWN: I appreciate it. (Missing.) Having been through many of these, the Coast Guard and ICE and all of the others have been incredibly good to us. And I hope we never have to call you and tell you that I can’t get help from the Coast Guard or somebody. Thank you for those comments.

SECRETARY CHERTOFF: Secondly, are there any DOD assets that might be available. Have we reached out to them, and have we, I guess, made any kind of arrangement in case we need some additional help from them?

MIKE BROWN: We have DOD assets over here at the EOC. They are fully engaged, and we are having those discussions with them now."

PM’s quick read also shows that the Committee report relies on testimony from witnesses who share the habit of using post-Katrina knowledge of what actually happened to criticize what seemed like reasonable decisions taken before the storm. From the report:

"According to Colonel Jeff Smith, Deputy Director for Emergency Preparedness with the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (LOHSEP), the 'single biggest failure' of the federal response was that it failed to recognize the likely consequences of the approaching storm and mobilize federal assets for a post-storm evacuation of the flooded city. If it had, then federal assistance would have arrived several days earlier."

This is the same Col Smith who, when asked by Mike Brown on Aug. 28 if there were any needs going unmet, replied:

COLONEL SMITH: Mike, no. (Inaudible) resources that are en route, and it looks like those resources that are en route are going to ... to be a good first shot. Naturally, once we get into this thing, you know, neck deep here, unfortunately, or deeper, I'm sure that things are going to come up that maybe some of even our best planners hadn't even thought about. So I think flexibility is going to be the key.

And just as quickly as we can cut through any potential red tape when those things do arise, you know, we just need to look at it. We appreciate your comments. I think they were to lean as far, far as you possibly can, you know, without falling, and your people here are doing that. And that's the type of attitude that we need in an event like this.

So, again, thank you very much.

We’ll have a fuller analysis once we get our hands on the complete report.--The Editors


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Louisiana; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/16/2006 1:14:11 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Thanks to Freeper "the Real fifi" for finding this.


2 posted on 02/16/2006 1:14:37 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 31-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Of course these Louisiana officials are going to subvert, diffuse, misdirect, and when that fails, they'll probably lie, to keep from having to accept responsibility for their action/inaction.

If this report absolves them and blames only the Feds, I am going to be really pissed! We in Oklahoma have had disasters, too, but I don't ever remember this level of animus against FEMA.

Recently, we've had terrible wildfires and the farmers' pastures are dying due to drought. Our Rat Governor dared to complain about FEMA. The response here was for farmers' to call and write to him (my nephew included) to tell him to shut up lest he be skewered like "Blanco". He shut up.
3 posted on 02/16/2006 1:49:02 AM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

Yesterday, three social workers came through the neighborhood, going door to dorr looking for people with unmet needs from hurricane Wilma. I told them that they do such a good job in Florida it is hard for me to believe the stories from NO.


4 posted on 02/16/2006 2:14:20 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter; All
HURRICANE KATRINA- archive of links

--HURRICANE KATRINA- archive of links-

5 posted on 02/16/2006 2:31:02 AM PST by backhoe ("It's so Easy to spend somebody else's Money..."[ My Dad. circa 1958 ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom
... but I don't ever remember this level of animus against FEMA.

That is because it is now Bush's FEMA and the left has never been as shrill as it is now. They are taking out all stops to try to regain power else they become insignificant.

As an aside, I didn't know Popular Mechanics did this kind of reporting/editorial.

6 posted on 02/16/2006 2:31:53 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom
I don't ever remember this level of animus against FEMA.

Hurricane Andrew saw similar coverage. Poppa Bush and the FEMA people in his administration were tagged as being indifferent to the suffering of people in south Florida.

7 posted on 02/16/2006 2:59:48 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 31-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
For now, though, here’s a quick overview of what seems to be the report’s most troubling shortfall: consistently blaming individuals for failing to foresee circumstances that only became clear with the laser-sharp vision of hindsight.

Good post. The local talking heads last night came within a nanometer of saying the report blamed George W. Bush personally for Katrina.

8 posted on 02/16/2006 3:01:01 AM PST by PogySailor (Semper Fi to the 3/1 H&S Company in Haditha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom
Of course these Louisiana officials are going to subvert, diffuse, misdirect, and when that fails,they'll probably lie, to keep from having to accept responsibility for their action/inaction.
----

9 posted on 02/16/2006 3:17:50 AM PST by WasDougsLamb (I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
I saw the Hurricane Katrina article, and they really did a good job of de-bunking the whole MSM "Katrina was a Bush / Republican-caused" story line. While PM is mostly just a 200 page advertisement for tools and gadgets, they do some good stories, and their editorial staff has some b@!!$. They run advertisements for guns all the time. I read an editorial answer to a letter a few years ago that just REAMED a reader for complaining about the gun ads. It really defended the Second Amendment, in no uncertain terms.

I really like the Jay Leno articles, too. You can tell they're written by him because they're in a kind of sincere, simple, stream-of-consciousness style that reads the way he speaks.

10 posted on 02/16/2006 3:30:17 AM PST by Hardastarboard (HEY - Billy Joe! You ARE an American Idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Politics vs Science, will the MSM be paying attention?


11 posted on 02/16/2006 4:09:02 AM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
I suppose PM correctly assumes their audience is on the right, more blue collar than academia. However, I would think they probably have a lot of union members as readers, too. I guess not all buy the union line.
12 posted on 02/16/2006 4:54:17 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Popular Mechanics?


13 posted on 02/16/2006 6:46:25 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
POPULAR MECHANICS obtained excerpts of a draft copy of the report last night.

The right of equal leakage? Everybody has a right to get into the act?

Trickle-down leakage?

The leaker couldn't find the phone number for Washington Post?

14 posted on 02/16/2006 9:02:23 AM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom
Louisiana officials are going to subvert, diffuse, misdirect, and when that fails, they'll probably lie, to keep from having to accept responsibility

Why should today be different than any other day?

15 posted on 02/16/2006 9:08:24 AM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

What Now? The Lessons of Katrina. PM debunks the Katrina Myths
Popular Mechanics | March 2006 | Camas Davis, Nicole Davis, Christian DeBenedetti, Brad Reagan, Kristin Roth
Posted on 03/11/2006 10:37:03 AM EST by Luis Gonzalez
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1594489/posts


16 posted on 07/22/2006 5:50:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson