Skip to comments.
Sunnis and Sadr's Shiites make peace
News.com.au Sunday Times ^
| February 26, 2006
Posted on 02/25/2006 11:01:07 AM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: NY Attitude
Not that strange. Here are the options for Sadr that I know of:
1) Iraq has a government and Sadr is part of it
2) Iraq has a government and Sadr is not part of it
3) Iraq has a government and Sadr sides with Iran an openly fights it (he will loose since the US is on the Iraq
government's side)
4) Iraq has a government and Sadr allies himself with Iran and al-Qaeda (he tried that and al-Qaeda kept killing
Shiite sheiks which alienated his adherents).
Sadr's only real option is #1 and that is the one he chose.
21
posted on
02/25/2006 11:37:41 AM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: montag813
We could have killed Zarqawi (or at least have a good chance of doing so) before the war, but the fools in the State Department were worried about us scaring away some of our allies before the war by hitting Zarqawi.
22
posted on
02/25/2006 11:37:59 AM PST
by
jmc1969
To: river rat
And over the grave of that nutcase in Iran.
23
posted on
02/25/2006 11:43:06 AM PST
by
gotribe
(Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
To: bnelson44
Here's the real deal:
"Iraq has a government and Sadr, who is a puppet of Iran,
is part of it"
24
posted on
02/25/2006 11:53:34 AM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: NY Attitude
Not so strange when you understand that the shiite and sunni families (and Kurds) are intermarried. These guys most probably have in-laws and cousins who belong to the other sect.
25
posted on
02/25/2006 11:57:11 AM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: traderrob6
It's one of the first signs of Nationalism and it's a positive unless of course you're speaking from the DNC vantage or the Pat Buchanan wing of the Republican party.You nailed it--the most clear-thinking poster on the thread. Present company excepted...
26
posted on
02/25/2006 11:57:39 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
To: nuconvert
Question is: How many of the then allies of the Ayatollah are still in favor after the departure of the Shah?
27
posted on
02/25/2006 11:58:10 AM PST
by
NY Attitude
(You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
To: nuconvert
You are so correct. Hale Shoma?
28
posted on
02/25/2006 11:59:34 AM PST
by
NY Attitude
(You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
To: nuconvert
29
posted on
02/25/2006 12:01:05 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: jmc1969; bnelson44; Ernest_at_the_Beach; McGavin999
Haw haw haw. So my prediction was off by a few days. It only took some twenty four hours to do the deal. I predicted within a week or so. Perhaps this will seal the tomb for zarq, as well as the Baathist, pure sectarian, and ahemmm, patriotic resistors.
They now will all have to morph from resitors to capacitors. Yea yea. I am going off the deep end.
Meanwhile the rope-a-dope king simply makes a few gentle statements to the effect he is confident things will work out ok. The rage in the L/MSM and dummy circles must be to hard to bare, expect a lot of self inflicted gunshot wounds to be reported.
30
posted on
02/25/2006 12:02:46 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: traderrob6
you get a ten on Olympic scoring system of insights.
31
posted on
02/25/2006 12:04:12 PM PST
by
q_an_a
To: Marine_Uncle; All
I found this part of the article interesting:
In fact, Sadr's office in Najaf issued a statement Saturday calling on his followers to eschew their trademark black uniforms.
"The order has been given to members of the Mehdi Army to no longer wear their black uniform, so that it not exploited by those who commit crimes," said the statement.
The statement added that those attacking mosques were "criminal bands with no links to the Sadr movement."
32
posted on
02/25/2006 12:06:55 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: smoothsailing
"Good read.I've seen nothing about this in the American media."
Surely you don't think they are that stupid. Of course as the sunni and shia walk the streets hand in hand, kissing one another in front of the remaining camera crews, the L/MSM will have a little problem. Their prayed for sectarian civil war shall not come to pass. And of course I know you stated in jest.
33
posted on
02/25/2006 12:07:23 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: jmc1969
The sheikhs condemned "those who excommunicate Muslims" a reference to the "takfireen" or Islamist extremists like Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who justify killing fellow Muslims by declaring them non-Muslims.
HADITH Sunan Abu Dawud [14:2526] Narrated Anas ibn Malik:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the
roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.
34
posted on
02/25/2006 12:09:38 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: NY Attitude
Khubam. : ) Hale shoma chetore?
35
posted on
02/25/2006 12:15:23 PM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: Marine_Uncle
36
posted on
02/25/2006 12:15:38 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: nuconvert
Khubam, motshakeram. Haste nabasheen.
37
posted on
02/25/2006 12:17:41 PM PST
by
NY Attitude
(You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
To: kajingawd
" they'll fight together now, against the infidels."
With respect. Whom? Al-Qaeda has now seen it's worse nightmare, the one zman has written in letters to UBL and the one eyed jack about. With a no possibility of creating a sectarian civil war, all insurgent groups no longer have a means to stay in the fight without having what is becoming a majority of Iraqi willing to point out where they hide.
As for instance the al-Qaeda goons are pushed out of all the rivertine main cities/towns into the remote western desert, they have no based of convenient operations. They have been scattered and minimized to a great effect.
Many of what used to be safe havens, secured car bomb and IED operations in many of the cities both in Al Anbar between the Syrian border down to Baggy dad and through the triangle of death areas have been closed down and the Ali Babbi killed, captured or forced to flee.
Similiarly these actions are being carried out in the northern provinces with equal success. Tal Afar is now as peacefull as a church mouse. Very few and widely spaced attacks happen in Mosul, Kirkuk, Orbil, Samarra, Balad, Tikrit etc..
The southern provinces continue to be mostly quite peacefull. How many attacks have we heard of in say Al Hilla, Al Naf and the other cities in Bibil and southerly that earlier on where hot spots. Sure Baghdad remains a hot spot. After all it is the capital.
But surely the whole country, thousands of towns and cities should be in flames at this point if there was such a willingness for Iraqi to be fighting one another. Why is it only less then a dozen cities out of thousands that you see on occasions an attack happening in? Think about it.
38
posted on
02/25/2006 12:19:48 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: bnelson44
I for one continue to think the zman had arrangement to carry out the attack on the shia shrine in Sammara. Or perhaps some small group on the Iranian mullahs or VEVAR payroll. Never the less intersting observance.
39
posted on
02/25/2006 12:23:44 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: traderrob6
err....um.....they also called for withdrawal of U.S. troops (presumably including those long-term bases), or did you miss that part?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson