Skip to comments.
US 'misread Saddam's order'
Herald Sun ^
| 15 March 2006
Posted on 03/14/2006 2:59:01 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Freee-dame
"the Foreign Affairs magazine reported in its online edition this week."
####
I get the feeling that Foreign Affairs magazine has the slant of Atlantic Monthly, or Harpers or the WaPo and the SUN.
21
posted on
03/14/2006 3:16:52 PM PST
by
maica
(You are being lied to. By elements in the media determined that Iraq must fail. - Ralph Peters)
To: eureka!
Well, the internet has gone a long way to eroding the MSM stranglehold on information. In the past, they only had to ignore a story in order to kill it. Now, the 'net allows for fast communication of material. This also one reason why the left has tried to regulate the internet or propose taxes on it - the want to kill it or make it a clone of the MSM.
22
posted on
03/14/2006 3:17:04 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: All
23
posted on
03/14/2006 3:17:50 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: Aussie Dasher
"Shh... Don't talk about the nerve agents on the radio. The Americans might be listening."
24
posted on
03/14/2006 3:18:13 PM PST
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Aussie Dasher
25
posted on
03/14/2006 3:18:48 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Army Air Corps
Yep. That and talk radio. We'd be seeing a second term Al Gore (or 1st term Kerry) without them...
26
posted on
03/14/2006 3:19:00 PM PST
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties and 'Rats: 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: hershey
Just fu_king great... here we are thinking those newly, translated documents were going to shed some light on pre-3/2003 Iraqi activity... and we get this sh_t!
27
posted on
03/14/2006 3:20:07 PM PST
by
johnny7
(“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
To: Grampa Dave
Some really poor excuse for SPIN for ya to read !!
28
posted on
03/14/2006 3:21:29 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: King Prout
29
posted on
03/14/2006 3:23:09 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Freee-dame
30
posted on
03/14/2006 3:23:33 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: Aussie Dasher
31
posted on
03/14/2006 3:32:27 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: Aussie Dasher
Yeah...and I'm sure that the Russians who were in Iraq months prior to the war were also just helping Saddam comply--as they moved their incriminating material out of that country.
32
posted on
03/14/2006 3:32:38 PM PST
by
cwb
(Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses)
To: Squantos
Thanks. No Comment on this BS.
33
posted on
03/14/2006 3:32:52 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Visit Free Republic to enjoy shameless Schadenfreude as the lies of liberals are exposed!)
To: American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; bannedfromdu; Beckwith; ...
34
posted on
03/14/2006 3:33:58 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Visit Free Republic to enjoy shameless Schadenfreude as the lies of liberals are exposed!)
To: Aussie Dasher
According to this report, Saddam was insisting that full access be given to weapons inspectors "in order not to give President Bush any excuses to start a war". Yeah, mmmm hmmmm. Sure. And John Kerry is an American war hero.
35
posted on
03/14/2006 3:34:31 PM PST
by
Coop
(FR= a lotta talk, but little action - now do you know what my tagline means?!?)
To: Peach
And so the spinning begins...
(Or maybe I should say "continues...")
36
posted on
03/14/2006 3:35:04 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Aussie Dasher
The Iraqis had the burden of proof to show that they were in compliance with the cease fire agreement of 1991 in order to avoid having hostilities restart.
To: Army Air Corps
This particular one is the state of Aussie media--this is an Australian paper.
38
posted on
03/14/2006 3:38:17 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: MizSterious
My mistake. The paper's title is the same as a US paper.
However, the Left's hold on many media outlets transcends borders.
39
posted on
03/14/2006 3:39:43 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Grampa Dave
What do you want to bet that if it's mentioned on H&C at all, the insipid Alan Colmes will quote this pap? (Just pulling one talking head show out of my hat--same applies for all of the ones that are left v. right.)
40
posted on
03/14/2006 3:44:20 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson