Creationist draws large crowd

York Daily Record (York, PA) ^ | 18 March 2006 | TERESA MCMINN

[ThinkDifferent]

we expect payment in the form of a Supreme Court majority that will toss Darwin out of the schools

Now I'm confused. I thought you guys just wanted "both sides" taught.

[Junior]

It amazes me how the liberal and DU trolls slither into FR when their most precious and indefensible "theories" are decimated here by articulate and passionate people of faith.

Those Designed Universe guys are pretty tenacious, you're right. However, it is the people of rationalism and science who send them packing.

[VadeRetro]

... we expect payment in the form of a Supreme Court majority that will toss Darwin out of the schools ...

If we're going to teach science, "Darwin" can't go anywhere.

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

Will...not...touch...with...ten...foot...pole...

Better stay away from #176, too.

[Junior]

The bill for our service is due -- we expect payment in the form of a Supreme Court majority that will toss Darwin out of the schools...

Well, seeing as how you'll never have any science on your side, your only hope is through forcing your agenda on everyone else through the courts.

[freedumb2003]

DU trolls note: It's nice to see an event that drives the Darwinists, secular humanists, ACLU and the liberals under their respective slimy rocks.

Got intoleranace?

But of course, a generic incorrect generalization is expected from prople who can't think.

[Junior]

;^)>

[Quick1]

It amazes me how the liberal and DU trolls slither into FR when their most precious and indefensible "theories" are decimated here by articulate and passionate people of faith.

That's funny, I've only seen one creationist brave enough to tell us which skulls posted earlier were apes, and which were humans. Doesn't sound like much "decimating" going on to me.

[freedumb2003]

[freedumb2003]

The Church had no onjection to science at all.

Then why did this thread open with an insult to scientists? Why do CRIDers advance their "cause" by equating science with atheism (aka "secular humanusm")?

[Doctor Stochastic]

A gap to hang a religion upon.

[freedumb2003]

That's funny, I've only seen one creationist brave enough to tell us which skulls posted earlier were apes, and which were humans. Doesn't sound like much "decimating" going on to me.

Even if CRIDers could decimate TToE, there would still be 90% left.

[js1138]

Science is acceptable to religion as long as scients are willing to sign the oath before publishing.

[freedumb2003]

Science is acceptable to religion as long as scients are willing to sign the oath before publishing.

OK, I'll bite -- what oath?

[Right Wing Professor]

The bill for our service is due -- we expect payment in the form of a Supreme Court majority that will toss Darwin out of the schools and put an end to the daily holocaust at the nation's abortuaries.

Problem is, you've so ticked off the rest of your coalition you'll never get another Supreme Court appointment. The GOP is going to lose seats in November, and possibly lose its majority in both houses. The Dems won't approve even an O Connor, let alone another Alito.

[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

Linking Darwin to abortion.

Egads.

[Right Wing Professor]

You're a DUer, aren't you, Greg? No way you could be for real.

[balrog666]

It amazes me how the liberal and DU trolls slither into FR ...

Yeah, those Designed Universe retreads should just slither off the planet.

[js1138]

http://www.holysmoke.org/cretins/icr-oath.htm

[VadeRetro]

What ape skulls look like now.

Oddly enough, they can evolve as close to human as to be classified in genus Homo, but can't get beyond H. heidelbergensis.

From this:

... one may evolve to this:

... but cannot proceed from there to this.

Why? Editor-surveyor says so.