Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Document Dated February/3/2003: Chemical Gears for The Chemical Group Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website fpr Iraqi PreWar document ^ | March 25 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 03/25/2006 1:05:50 PM PST by jveritas

In page 3 this Saddam Regime document ISGZ-2004-019744.pdf dated February/3/2003 there is a request to supply Chemical gear for the Chemical group. This document is a letter from an Iraqi “Export and Import Company” Vendor” addressed to the Iraqi Army “Commission Of Equipment” stating his pleasure to provide the Chemical Gear for the Chemical Group and he goes into Chemical gear equipment he can provides. This Chemical Group is part of the Feedaeyeen Saddam as other parts of the document indicate.

Beginning of the translation page 3 of the ISGZ-2004-019744.pdf :

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

To the Secretary/ The Commission of Equipment

Subject: Equipping The Chemical Group

Best Salute

I am pleased to present an offer (The Assembly against the Chemical Strike) and it contains the following parts:

1. Uniform.

2. Gloves.

3. Mask.

4. Shoes

5. Hat

Knowing that this assembly is from Belgian origin. Please inform with the extent of your need of this assembly and the quantity (Since the price is connected to the quantity) and as soon as possible to allow us to agree to import it to the country and as soon as possible.

This and accept our best appreciations considering ourselves faithful soldiers to serve this country under the Leadership of the redeemer Saddam Hussein (God protect and shepherd him) and from victory to victory and from God the success.

Signature…

Wadah Abdel Wahed Al Rawi

Al Mansour/ Al Andalos Street 611/ drive 10/ Al Baali Building PhoneL 5436500

3/2/2003

End the translation of page 3.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2003; 200302; 20030203; abdelwahedalrawi; alrawi; belgium; chemicalgear; chemicalweapons; iraqiintelligence; isgz2004019744; jveritas; onfreep; prewardocs; protectivegear; rawi; wadahwahedalrawi; wahedalrawi; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2006 1:05:51 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

This is from Feberuary 2003!!! I think there is even more than just an active Chemical Platoon.


2 posted on 03/25/2006 1:08:05 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Do I not recall that our troops discovered lots of this chemical weapons protective gear during the initial days? Our troops were fully outfitted as well for such an event. Both sides apparantly had reason to believe this eventuality was highly possible.


3 posted on 03/25/2006 1:18:58 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
You are single handedly going to destroy the dim party! Well done sir!! Please keep up the GREAT WORK... and GOD bless you for doing it!

LLS
4 posted on 03/25/2006 1:19:04 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Document Dated February/3/2003: Chemical Gears for The Chemical Group Translation)

Borrowing eyespysomething's ping list this time because this relates to the other document translated today by jveritas regarding the "Chemical Platoon." Hope no one minds the ping

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database

5 posted on 03/25/2006 1:26:19 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

"Do I not recall that our troops discovered lots of this chemical weapons protective gear during the initial days?"

Yep

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/27/sprj.irq.iraq.chemical.suits/

UK: Chemical suits found in Iraq
Thursday, March 27, 2003 Posted: 3:15 PM EST (2015 GMT)
LONDON, England (CNN) -- British military officials said Thursday they found chemical weapons protection suits when Iraqi infantry abandoned a headquarters facility in the oil fields of southern Iraq.



6 posted on 03/25/2006 1:26:35 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Chemical platoon thread here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602985/posts


7 posted on 03/25/2006 1:27:32 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Grampa Dave; Dog; sgtyork; Mo1; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; ...
Chemical gear for the Chemical group.

Thought process going on here....I don't see anything specific to an offensive capability....but seems to be specific to only the Chemical Group....was he not equipping the regular soldiers with some of the same equipment....would be a question....course the plan would be only that the enemy would be hit by the chemicals...

So by INF ERENCE

Can't we say that the Chemical Group is an Offensive group!!!! Just trying to nail down obvious things......

8 posted on 03/25/2006 1:28:01 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Thanks, Mo1. I thought so.


9 posted on 03/25/2006 1:29:14 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
a letter from an Iraqi “Export and Import Company” Vendor” addressed to the Iraqi Army

I assume this ties in to the oil-for-food scandal?

10 posted on 03/25/2006 1:31:00 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Chemical group was part of Feedeyeen Saddam and I strongly believe this group was designed more for offensive and not defensive actions. You are right, why they only equipped very few soldiers with such a gear and not all of them if they are really worried about the welfare of soldiers being attacked by Chemical weapons. Saddam knew very well that the US will not Chemical weapons against his army or his city.
11 posted on 03/25/2006 1:31:57 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Knowing that this assembly is from Belgian origin

Belgian?

Of course, it could be code for deflection of real source

12 posted on 03/25/2006 1:33:20 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Even up to the point that US forces were driving toward the Kabala Pass, Saddam had so compartmentalized his military that senior military commanders were not sure or not if Iraq had chemical or biological weapons. It was only after the US Marine Expeditioary passed through Karbala that Saddam Hussein told his own senior military commanders that they indeed did NOT have WMD. He had up until that time maintained the Chemical Platoons to reassure his military, and to threaten the Kurds and Iranians, with their assumptions made about Iraq's WMD capabilities.

The Chemical Platoons described in jveritas' previous post today has the same platoon composition as has been the standard Chemical platoon for the Iraqi military since 1983.

The purchase of the Belgian chemical protection equipment was a rouse to fool senior Iraqi commanders and the outside world...


13 posted on 03/25/2006 1:35:41 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
OTOH. Belgium does produce CBW suits. IIRC, Belgium is a major weapons producer, it is a large part of their GNP.
14 posted on 03/25/2006 1:38:29 PM PST by null and void (Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the plan would be only that the enemy would be hit by the chemicals.

If your unit is firing chemical weapons they still need to be protected, particularly if there is a chance the wind could blow back your way.

15 posted on 03/25/2006 1:39:48 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
He had up until that time maintained the Chemical Platoons to reassure his military, and to threaten the Kurds and Iranians, with their assumptions made about Iraq's WMD capabilities.

Interesting scenario and would be supported by the AP's "poor frustrated Saddam" reporting on the tapes where Saddam and other officials say they have no chemical weapons.

16 posted on 03/25/2006 1:42:04 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Well, between the UN and the countries that were involved in the weapons for oil scam - there must be a whole lot of nervous nellies glued to tv's all over the world in fear of what the next doc translation might be...gotta love it.

What's that old saw: "Justice will out."

17 posted on 03/25/2006 1:46:27 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

One can hope...


18 posted on 03/25/2006 1:49:10 PM PST by null and void (Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
a whole lot of nervous nellies glued to tv's all over

If they're glued to TVs all they're seeing is march madness ... Fox News needs to get behind this document release and start reporting it because it's going way under-reported. Too many of my well-informed friends are only vaguely or not at all aware of this until I tell them about it.

19 posted on 03/25/2006 1:55:09 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No smoking gun here..close but no.


20 posted on 03/25/2006 1:59:37 PM PST by Dog (We have had a date with destiny and Iran for 27 years---appealof2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Yes that would be an offensive unit,....right!


21 posted on 03/25/2006 2:00:39 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Iraqi military were great record keepers.... there is a memo(I have doubt it exists) telling Unit X to move WMD out of Iraq.

Keeping digging in those 40,000 boxes...the truth is out there.

22 posted on 03/25/2006 2:03:06 PM PST by Dog (We have had a date with destiny and Iran for 27 years---appealof2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Marine_Uncle

Agreed.....I doubt one document would have a smoking gun, they probably made sure they destroyed the cache of such,....but by inference we can get some ideas,....course the MSM will be working hard to prove otherwise....


23 posted on 03/25/2006 2:04:17 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog
No smoking gun here..close but no.

I'd be very surprised if we found a smoking gun. Unless there's a handwritten note to Saddam that says something like, "Take the WMDs here" with a hand-drawn map showing a road to Syria, I doubt we'll get a "smoking gun." These documents, taken in their totality, are continuing to bolster what most of us agree was a good cause to begin with ... the invasion and regime change in Iraq. The preponderance of the evidence continues to mount, and the smoking gun is the documents as a whole.

24 posted on 03/25/2006 2:05:15 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Agree.


25 posted on 03/25/2006 2:11:07 PM PST by Dog (We have had a date with destiny and Iran for 27 years---appealof2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think that much can be gained from determining if this was declared activity or not.

Hold on for a minute and I'll get Koffi on the phone and get that question answered post haste! /sarc.

Wether these tidbits were declared or not does more than infer, imho.


26 posted on 03/25/2006 2:12:51 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
The purchase of the Belgian chemical protection equipment was a rouse to fool senior Iraqi commanders and the outside world...

That presumes that stories of WMD being moved to Syria are false. Their is a hypothetical that allows both to be true. Perhaps Saddam did not have artillery WMD munitions, but did have WMD munitions deliverable by plane or helicopter. So therefore, the artillery was a rouse, but the air munitions were taken to Syria. He was not able to use his air force due his loss of control of all airspace. And any planes or helicopters were taken out during the initial air strikes. That may explain why the Soviets gave up and moved them out, hypothetically.

27 posted on 03/25/2006 2:19:30 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

BTTT


28 posted on 03/25/2006 2:28:31 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
The purchase of the Belgian chemical protection equipment was a rouse to fool senior Iraqi commanders and the outside world...

So President Bush did not lie to us about Iraq WMD's if these two documents are telling about Chemical activities and even if we assume that its purpose were to fool his military and make them think that they still have WMD. If his military was deceived by him on the WMD issue all the way till the end, then the "Left Lie" that President Bush lied to us on Iraq WMD is being destroyed more and more by these documents.

29 posted on 03/25/2006 2:50:25 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Great point.


30 posted on 03/25/2006 2:51:15 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
That presumes that stories of WMD being moved to Syria are false.

See this lengthy and fascinating analysis from the documents by wretchard at Belmont Club:

Friday, March 24, 2006 Criswell predicts ...

**************************AN EXCERPT****************************

Update

The other striking thing in Document CMPC-2003-001950 was why the Russians should be particularly worried about the smallest component of the deployment:

4- The ambassador pointed that what worried us (most probably “us” refers to the Russians) was the increase in the number of planes in Jordan where the number of planes in Al Sallt base was as follows: 24 planes F-16 10 planes Tornado 11 planes Harrier He also mentioned that there were 10 A-10 tank destroyers in the Jordanian base of King Faysal.

Why were these relatively small forces so worrisome? My guess is their location near the Iraq-Syrian border and the composition of these air units were suggestive of support for an air assault attack on traffic to and from Syria. What was moving between Iraq and Syria that would be of concern to the Russians?

31 posted on 03/25/2006 2:52:15 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Foxnews is not reporting on these documents because they believe what some intelligence people (mainly bureaucrats) are saying, and that is there is nothing important in these documents. Foxnews is not the best investigative news outfit, and they spend much more time talking about tabloid news than the real news.


32 posted on 03/25/2006 2:56:06 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

"I'd be very surprised if we found a smoking gun. Unless there's a handwritten note to Saddam that says something like, "Take the WMDs here" with a hand-drawn map showing a road to Syria, I doubt we'll get a "smoking gun." "



On the other hand, I'd bet that our first targets in Iraq were in fact the weak point in most Eastern Bloc-based military systems and PARTICULARLY Saddam's: Command and Control.

Which, IMHO, means that the only reliable methods of communication left in Iraq after the first hour or two of air/cruise missile attack was word-of-mouth or written & hand-delivered hunk of paper.

Got to be bloody HUNDREDS of those things lying about, even if the recipients were told to destroy 'em, and that ignores the autocrat impulse to copy everything one does as cover-my-arse or book deal material.

We may very well not only find "smoking gun" notes addressed TO Saddam, but some FROM that same person complete with signature. (As a humorous interlude, just imagine the fuss if one of those "from Saddam" things turned up with a UN address.....)


33 posted on 03/25/2006 3:10:19 PM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet ("Antique" MSM infers some remaining functionality; IMO they're the zombie media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder; Dog; jveritas

See post 31 and bold type for smoking gun by inference.....


34 posted on 03/25/2006 3:10:43 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I've had differences with you in the past but I am 100% behind your efforts here... you are the man!


35 posted on 03/25/2006 3:11:56 PM PST by thoughtomator (Symmetry Inspector #7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"So by INF ERENCE
Can't we say that the Chemical Group is an Offensive group!!!!"

I think it's a reasonable inference that the Iraqi Army was preparing for chemical warfare. Now, since the U.S. hasn't used chemical weapons since 1918, had signed agreements banning their use, and was publically in the act of destroying chemical stockpiles, whose chemical warfare was the Iraqi Army preparing for?


36 posted on 03/25/2006 3:13:16 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

thank you for adding me to the ping list! Can someone explain why the documents are divided into three different sites and why the documents from the (also here) site don't seem to have any translations?


Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Also here

Documents from the Harmony Database


37 posted on 03/25/2006 3:14:44 PM PST by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG; eyespysomething

I borrowed eyespysomething's ping list this time, it's actually her list ... Iraqi freedom documents are taken from Iraq; Harmony database documents are from Afghanistan and "and here" is tied to the operation iraqi freedom docs, just a different link that sometimes automatically pops up.


38 posted on 03/25/2006 3:18:59 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Do I not recall that our troops discovered lots of this chemical weapons protective gear during the initial days?

@@@@@

Yes, and our troops found supplies of atropine pre-loaded syringes, that also were purchased from foreign suppliers (French?). Apparently every Iraqi commander knew that he and his troops did not have chemicals but were told that the commands to their right and left had them, so all had to be prepared for the activation of the chemicals against the invading forces. All were shocked that no chemicals were used.

Remember the chickens that our troops took on the march, to be their early warning system, their canary in the coal mine?


39 posted on 03/25/2006 3:19:58 PM PST by maica (You are being lied to. By elements in the media determined that Iraq must fail. - Ralph Peters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Some of the items we found when we entered Iraq were all these chem-suits and atropine injectors. I always believed they had them for more than just a fashion statement.


40 posted on 03/25/2006 3:25:03 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Yes--their claim of being "over-extended" tends to lose credence as they cover every little sneeze out of Aruba.


41 posted on 03/25/2006 3:48:03 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Where the "F" is the MSM on this?!?!?


42 posted on 03/25/2006 4:00:45 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
Where the "F" is the MSM on this?!?!?

The same place as Osama Bin Laden.

Hiding
43 posted on 03/25/2006 4:13:18 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

Having a Fox News Alert about the Dam Killing of the Minister...who gives a rats ass anyway!


44 posted on 03/25/2006 4:18:06 PM PST by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Iran has large numbers of chemical weapons, used chemical weapons against Iraq in the Iran-Iraq War, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died in that war, and the Persians and Arabs have fought continuously for about 3,000 years.

People are really twisting themselves into pretzels trying to turn the presence of a chemical decontamination unit, a type of unit common in militaries throughout the world that don't have any chemical weapons and don't really have obvious enemies, into something more than it is.


45 posted on 03/25/2006 4:23:17 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Please establish for me how you came to the conclusion this is only a defensive decontamination unit. Then please show me when and where this entity was declared as demanded under multiple resolutions.

The only thing that would make this unit legit is IF it was declared. Do you know the answer to wether it was or not? If not then I suppose I could turn your own words back on you and say that you are twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to turn the presence of this entity into something valid.

You are giving Saddam the benfit of the doubt. It is fine for you to do so but I ask why it is he deserves that benefit from you.

The key here is wether or not this was declared. That is the question to ask that, when answered, will show what this really was.


46 posted on 03/25/2006 4:28:56 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Can you tell me where you heard that Fox News is not reporting on these documents because they were told by someone in government to ignore them? I want to follow up with whoever at Fox you heard that from. Thanks


47 posted on 03/25/2006 5:47:17 PM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

LOL!!! missing girls and car chase.


48 posted on 03/25/2006 9:42:03 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
During the Iran-Iraq war the Iranians did not use chemical weapons against the Iraqis because they did not have them, however the Iraqis did use them against the Iranians. Now the Iranians do have chemical weapons, but I do not believe for a moment that Saddam was afraid of Iran hitting them with chemical weapons in 2001.

Per the UN resolutions everything that was remotely related to Chemical was forbidden in Iraq, offensive or defensive it does not matter. This Chemical Platoon in 2001 was simply illegal.

49 posted on 03/25/2006 9:47:56 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Note the date :

JANUARY 16, 2003 : (IRAQ : UNMOVIC DISCOVERS EMPTY CHEMICAL MUNITIONS - IRAQ ACTS INNOCENT AND APPOINTS A "COMMISSION OF INQUIRY" ) Among other developments, the report [ the twelfth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) in accordance with paragraph 12 of Security Council resolution 1284 (1999), covering UNMOVIC's activities from 1 December 2002 to 28 February 2003.] notes that, on 16 January, UNMOVIC inspectors discovered a number of empty 122-mm chemical munitions. Following that discovery, Iraq appointed a commission of inquiry. - "Statements to the UN Security Council by two Inspectors and Members of the SC, 7 Mar 2003 ," UN Press Release SC/7682, 07/03/2003, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/859554/posts

JANUARY 16, 2003 : (IRAQ : UN INSPECTORS DISCOVER PREVIOUSLY UNDISCLOSED WARHEADS FOR CHEMICAL WEAPONS). Previously undisclosed warheads for chemical weapons are discovered by UN inspectors. -- via "Bio-Chemical Weapons & Saddam: A History, " Various Sources , 02-20-03 , by PsyOp

50 posted on 03/25/2006 10:42:54 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson