Congress Told of More ATF Abuses, Reforms Suggested

CNSNews.com ^ | March 29, 2006 | Jeff Johnson

[neverdem]

Senior Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) - An Arizona police supervisor Tuesday said the federal agency charged with regulating the nation's firearms industry "absolutely devastated" his career and his personal life, all because he gave a gun to a friend as a gift.

Tucson Police Lt. Michael Lara was among a panel of witnesses who told the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is in need of serious reform.

Lara purchased a handgun from a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL) in 2003, planning to give it to a friend who was licensed by the Arizona State Police to carry a concealed weapon. One of the forms he completed as part of the purchase asked if he was the "actual buyer" of the firearm. The 28-year law enforcement veteran read the definition of "actual buyer" on the form and answered the question "yes."

During a review of the gun dealer's records, ATF noticed Lara's purchase and began investigating it. Lara was placed on administrative leave with pay, but even after an internal affairs investigation cleared him of any wrongdoing, ATF continued to pursue the case for seven additional months.

"ATF indicted me, claiming that I had not purchased the firearm as a gift, but that I had actually bought it for my friend using her money," Lara recalled.

The crime Lara was accused of is typically referred to as a "straw purchase," when one person buys a firearm on behalf of another person who is, usually, legally disqualified from gun ownership.

Lara said he initially believed that ATF would investigate the charges objectively, determine that he was innocent and move on to other cases. He now complains that ATF never interviewed any of the witnesses to the purchase of the firearm or his presentation of it to his friend as a gift. Lara said he is still baffled by the agency's actions.

"It just makes no sense to me why ATF would try to prosecute someone who had dedicated themselves to serving our community and who clearly did nothing wrong," Lara concluded. "It was obvious that there was no intent of wrongdoing."

After he was processed as a federal prisoner, Lara was released on his own recognizance, but now was unemployed and the recipient of intense media scrutiny, awaiting his day in court.

"I lost over $216,000 in saving and earnings. I had to refinance my home to help pay the bills and the attorney's fees," Lara recalled. "Three months after my arrest, my case went to trial. At the end of the trial, the jury deliberated less than one hour before finding me innocent of the charges."

Lara would wait two more months for his badge to be returned to him. But the ATF prosecution did not end when he resumed his police career.

"On my first day back to work I was given a 40-hour suspension without pay for 'criminal activity' because I had been indicted," Lara continued. "My professional career is shot. It's now been three years after the event and I am still a patrol lieutenant. It was made clear to me when I returned to work that I would never see any advancement."

The ATF representative present at the hearing did not address Lara's case, but Kristen Rand, legislative director for the anti-gun Violence Policy Center, did.

"Mr. [sic] Lara's situation sounds extremely unpleasant," Rand said, "but we should be careful not to just legislate based on one anecdote."

Pro-gun attorney says ATF over-reaching extends to dealers, too

Richard Gardiner, a Virginia attorney and an expert in federal firearms laws who often represents FFLs and gun owners under ATF scrutiny, argued that Lara's case is actually closer to being the rule than the exception.

"The ATF tends to focus or has a significant focus on trivial, immaterial violations which are unrelated to public safety," Gardiner said. "And they impose unreasonable standards of perfection which are simply not humanly achievable."

As an example, Gardiner recalled an ATF review of 880 "Firearms Transaction Record Part I - Over-The-Counter" forms collected by one of his gun dealer clients. Of the 34,320 blocks of information collected on those documents, ATF found 19 clerical errors.

"That is a 99.96 percent perfect completion record," Gardiner noted. "Yet ATF took the position that, because the dealer was aware -- based on the fact that he had completed 99.96 percent of the forms accurately -- that he committed a 'willful violation' with regard to the other four one-hundredths of a percent because he knew what his legal obligations were."

The bureau revoked that gun dealer's license and closed his business.

"Essentially, what the ATF position is, is that human beings can make no mistakes," Gardiner complained. "Indeed, in the oral argument in that case one of the judges asked the U.S. attorney what the ATF's position was and he said, 'zero tolerance.'"

Audrey Stucko, deputy assistant director for ATF's enforcement programs and services, defended the agency's actions.

"Under the Gun Control Act, license revocation may be undertaken for any willful violation of the law or regulations," Stucko said. "The term 'willful' is not defined in the law."

Federal courts have often sided with ATF's interpretation that the term "willful" means only that the gun dealer had prior knowledge of a requirement and, subsequent to gaining that knowledge, violated it, with or without intent. Gardiner told of cases where ATF identified customer responses of "Y" or "N" rather than "yes" or "no" in written responses to questions as "willful violations" on the part of gun dealers under investigation. Other dealers lost their licenses, Gardiner said, because customers had accurately listed their street address, city, state and zip code, but failed to include their county of residence.

"This is clearly not what Congress had in mind when it enacted the 'willful' standard in 1986," Gardiner argued. "A Senate Judiciary Committee report stated that the purpose for adding 'willfully' to the license revocation procedure is, and I quote, 'to insure that licenses are not revoked for inadvertent errors or technical mistakes.' But that is precisely what ATF is doing."

Subcommittee Chairman Howard Coble (R-N.C.) expressed concern about how ATF was spending some of the taxpayer dollars used to fund its work.

"ATF should not waste valuable resources worrying about ministerial errors committed by licensees," Coble said. "Rather, they should focus, it seems to me, on those licensees who willfully violate the laws and regulations and pose a threat of significant harm."

Coble also addressed ATF's pursuit of law-abiding gun buyers like Lt. Michael Lara.

"Prosecutions that are aimed at only padding case statistics - and I'm not suggesting that that's done, but if it is done - not only waste government resources but can also tarnish a law-abiding citizen's reputation as well, and cause individuals severe financial distress," Coble said.

His subcommittee is considering legislation that would give ATF other options besides revoking a gun dealer's license for lesser violations and unintentional errors. The proposal also includes a statutory definition of "willful violations" that would force ATF to prove that a gun dealer knowingly and intentionally defied a law or regulation before sanctions could be imposed.

[Oztrich Boy]

So much for playing by the rules.

It's just FATE (Firearms, Alcohol, Tobacco, Ecplosives)

[TXnMA]

"The term 'willful' is not defined in the law."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That brings to mind another slimeball excuse:

"No controlling legal authority"...

[kstewskis]

It's just FATE (Firearms, Alcohol, Tobacco, Ecplosives)

Hmmm...I have the first three, but not the last.

Do sparklers from last 4th of July count? ;o)

[looscnnn]

When I say justify I mean hard numbers, like did they spend $50k to get $100? I'm not talking about the touchy, feely justification which is what they were able to get from the Senate. Money wise Waco was a huge waste of taxpayer's money. On the human front it was a tragedy.

[investigateworld]

I know what was behind Ruby Ridge/Randy Weaver BS, never got the skinny on WACO.
Anyone?

[looscnnn]

From what I understand of the reasons it was due to a bunch of firearms that were bought (supposedly over $50k). They say that Koresh bought them. I believe that they claim that there were a bunch of unregistered full autos. They also claimed Koresh was involved in statatory rape. I think that was part of the "warrant" that they were trying to "serve" Koresh. They claimed that Koresh never left the compound, but he jogged on the road outside the compound daily.

[investigateworld]

Those were the public 'reasons', having worked around federal LEOs in my previous career, I know they have another agenda 99% of the time.
And statutory rape is a state violation?

[Uncle Jaque]

Re "...aren't you supposed to pull the ski mask down far enough so's you can see out of it?"

Is that why they keep running around bumping into and tripping over things?

[vrwc0915]

"Should be about June....."

Might not have that long

[looscnnn]

http://www.carolmoore.net/waco/ is an interesting read.

[Barnacle]

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms

What can you say about a bureau established for the purpose of harassing guys who like to pop a beer, light up a cigar and do some plinking?

BATF sounds like something in need of some serious abolishing.

[Barnacle]

Ski mask + Weapon = Criminal

[LuxMaker]

Unfortunately it is the nature of bureaucracies to create a problem, or let a current problem fester, to become the solution, to establish more control. This so often happens in politics as well. Just insert politics in place of bureaucracies.

Now I am not saying all bureaucracies or politicians are like this but I am saying that they gravitate toward this end result as it is the path of least resistance.

By nailing the little guys it creates job security as the big problems become larger as they are left alone. The real problem is still around justifying the need for more control by the bureaucracy(politicians).

[Smokin' Joe]

Waco was murder most foul, not just a 'tragedy'.

[therut]

IF GUNOWNERS were politcally active and I mean in the left leaning way of positive action this crap would stop. If every time a gunowner or FFL is harassed the squeaky wheel was heard loud this would stop. Look what illegal immigrants can do by just protesting. When did you ever see GUNOWNERS protest. NEVER. Conservatives just don't act that way.

[Travis McGee]

Thanks! I'd be done already, if not for freeping........

[freepatriot32]

I'm sure all of this will be done away with when we get a republican majo.....you know what screw it i cant even go through the motions anymore.

How many f**king times a year for the last 5 have we heard of this kind of bulls**t going on over and over again and each time some timid little whore that gets a federal paycheck somewhat casually suggests a reform or two here and there and what happens with all that lip service? not a g*dd**n thing ever and it wont happen because no one is getting pissed enough to throw these sobs out of office that have oversight to bring these jack boot fascists under control.Heres a little thing to note georgie bush (you know the man that point blank said he would sign the assault weapons ban if it got to his desk and brags about project safe neighborhoods that rino pos)can disband the entire agency tomorrow with an executive order but never has even considered it and he still gets a good rating from the ultra liberal NRA. (whose former president helped get the 68 gun control act passed which was an almost verbatim translation from germanys gun control act)the NRA needs this kind of crap going on to raise massive amounts of money from the uninformed sheeple that cant see that that group along with the government are a huge part of the problem.its not a conspiracy its a collusion

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here

[freepatriot32]

seperated at birth?

[LibertarianInExile]

"I'm sure all of this will be done away with when we get a republican majo.....you know what screw it i cant even go through the motions anymore...How many f**king times a year for the last 5 have we heard of this kind of bulls**t going on over and over again and each time some timid little whore that gets a federal paycheck somewhat casually suggests a reform or two here and there and what happens with all that lip service? not a g*dd**n thing ever and it wont happen because no one is getting pissed enough to throw these sobs out of office that have oversight to bring these jack boot fascists under control.Heres a little thing to note georgie bush (you know the man that point blank said he would sign the assault weapons ban if it got to his desk and brags about project safe neighborhoods that rino pos)can disband the entire agency tomorrow with an executive order but never has even considered it and he still gets a good rating from the ultra liberal NRA. (whose former president helped get the 68 gun control act passed which was an almost verbatim translation from germanys gun control act)the NRA needs this kind of crap going on to raise massive amounts of money from the uninformed sheeple that cant see that that group along with the government are a huge part of the problem.its not a conspiracy its a collusion"

What you said. Only with more punctuation. 8)

[freepatriot32]

i thought all those red dots i was seeing in front of my eyes were periods honest:-) it must have just been the red rage instead lol