Posted on 04/07/2006 2:23:47 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
DHS Child Sex Sting Official Is A Democrat
Earlier today we listed some of the strong reaction to the arrest of Department of Homeland Security deputy press secretary Brian J. Doyle for attempting to arrange sexual relations with what he believed to be a 14-year-old female. Much of the reaction was critical of the Bush administration for not properly vetting one of their appointees. That assessment is dead wrong.
Brian Doyle is a career civil servant - NOT a political appointee. Government workers aren't "vetted." Doyle, as a DHS employee probably has a secret or top secret government clearance, but in DC that's hardly a unique commodity in DC. Unless there is some prior history of pedophilia or sex crimes, the background searches and investigation wouldn't have alerted anyone to the possibility that he might get into the kind of trouble he's in now. The kind of hindsight analysis suggesting that the White House should have been "vetting" the civil service employees of their agencies, is laughable considering that the Clinton administration who dogged for years over the FBI files scandal (Filegate). It's also probably illegal...
So what do we know about is Brian Doyle? He's a former Time magazine reporter, career civil servant, and a registered Democrat.
Glad they got this POS pedofile and sad they can't keep using their efforts to catch more vs playing political reindeer games with their limited resources.....
Only a socialist loser rat which is one level below the child abuser they caught IMO could be so damn stooooopid !
HOLY COW!
He's a DEM and the MSM were trying to make it sound as though he is a GOPer! Just what part of THAT are you having a problem grasping?
So he's a Democrat. We should have known! How many more like him are there in Homeland Security?
In the interest of truth maybe....
"Why do I give a flying leap what his political affiliations are? As if there are no Republican pedophiles?"
The difference is that, a Republican pedophile would warrant headlines in the MSM, whereas being a DUmbocrat is excusable.
Yet another thing for which to thank the filthy greedy pond scum of the Bar.
-ccm
so , will this be some "red meat" for the MediaBrains in the administration?
or, are they busy crafting their next "dryToast PepRally" [?!?]
they could at least have someone compile a snazzy TV spot of AntiqueMedia falsehoods
Paul begala just did one [fer chrissakes!]
I'd love it , if we had another "RATs" TV spot for the upcoming election
I am never surprised by this. these agencies are FULL of demorats and clinton holdovers. so often when you see that agencies do outrageous things, it is these guys that do things to thwart this administration. the fda is full of liberals.
It's amazing anymore.
Actually now I blame Bush. What sort of moron hires a Times Reporter and Democrat for a Homeland Security position?
THAT is why his political affiliation matters in this case.
The question is more appropriately, what makes you so anxious to blame Bush that you don't even get to the second paragraph where your presumption is proven wrong?
Who is the 'moron' here, anyway? Certainly NOT President Bush.
He's become a bump on the butt of the Donk Party.
No Democrat should be working under the Bush administration. I don't think many people know about Doyle being a Democrat, and the MSN isn't saying much either.
Thanks for posting this.
And that makes him different from any other politician in Washington how again? (sorry that was too easy..LOL)
Who cares what 'party' he belonged to? What department did he work for? What administration created that department again? Shouldn't whoever hired him have done another background check considering the documents he may see or work with? There is a time and place partisan politics have to be dropped and focus on the fact that this man was a government employee who committed a crime instead of this childish 'neener, neener, he's a Democrat!!!' so some can feel superior about their 'team'
Sorry I meant to say 'chimp'.
And strong, moral, honorable, courageous leader is the right description of the President.
You can keep those leftist Hollywood insults to yourself. We're conservatives around here, in case you missed that......
Thanks for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.