Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Early Farmers Took Time To Tame Wheat
Science News ^ | 4-20-2006 | Bruce Bower

Posted on 04/20/2006 1:33:04 PM PDT by blam

Week of April 15, 2006; Vol. 169, No. 15 , p. 237

Early farmers took time to tame wheat

Bruce Bower

Domesticated varieties of wheat emerged gradually in the prehistoric Near East over a roughly 3,000-year span, a new investigation suggests.

CULTIVATED FINDS. Microscopic analysis of wheat grains such as these from a 6,500-year-old Syrian site revealed clues to plant domestication in prehistoric times. Willcox/CNRS

Ken-ichi Tanno of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature in Kyoto, Japan, and George Willcox of the National Center for Scientific Research in Berrias, France, examined 804 wheat-ear remnants recovered at four ancient villages in southeastern Turkey and northern Syria.

Wild and domesticated ears of wheat shatter at maturity in distinctive ways, so microscopic study can distinguish the two forms.

No signs of domesticated wheat appeared at the oldest Near Eastern site, which was initially inhabited about 10,200 years ago, Tanno and Willcox report in the March 31 Science. A 9,250-year-old village yielded a small amount of the cultivated cereal. Progressively larger amounts of domesticated wheat turned up at two younger sites, one dating to 7,500 years ago and the other to 6,500 years ago.

The researchers suspect that as wheat domestication slowly expanded, some Near Eastern farmers nevertheless continued to tend and harvest wild wheat.

If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agriculture; early; farmers; godsgravesglyphs; tame; time; took; wheat

1 posted on 04/20/2006 1:33:07 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping.

Taming Wheat Took Time

2 posted on 04/20/2006 1:34:35 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I thought I read all about that in "Guns, Germs and Steel". Is this supposed to be news?


3 posted on 04/20/2006 1:40:24 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I guess the real trick was teaching them to "Stay", and waking up in the morning to see if the whole field was still there, or had wandered off in the nighttime, leaving a dustbowl.


4 posted on 04/20/2006 1:42:19 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Intriguing. One might expect a more rapid dissemination once domestication was achieved.


5 posted on 04/20/2006 1:55:47 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I guess the real trick was teaching them to "Stay", and waking up in the morning to see if the whole field was still there, or had wandered off in the nighttime, leaving a dustbowl.

That was a period when wheatherders had an advantage because they could follow the wheat and bring it back to the farm.

6 posted on 04/20/2006 1:58:13 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (If you have a leaking pipe, you shut off the water valve before deciding on amnesty for the puddles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
Wheat was unique in that it went thru two chance, natural hybridizations with goat grass and remained fertile each time. The result was a grain that was hard to beat. Consequently, there were few attempts to improve on it.

Ancient genetic tricks shape up wheat.

I recall this being presented in a PBS nature or history show many, many years ago and the implications were that man didn't domesticate wheat, wheat domesticated man.

7 posted on 04/20/2006 2:55:51 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Wow!




















Thanks for the link, and...wow!

Where'd we be without that first hybridization?


8 posted on 04/20/2006 3:54:53 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
January 3, 2006

Ancient genetic tricks shape up wheat

Turning back the evolutionary clock offers better crops for dry regions.

by Tom Simonite
news@nature.com

By re-enacting an evolutionary event that happened to wheat thousands of years ago, researchers are producing new plant varieties that could save lives in regions where drought causes food shortages.

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum), a staple food for millions of people around the world, is the product of two rare genetic events that happened during the Stone Age in a region of the Middle East known as the 'fertile crescent'.

Two different species can't usually breed to produce hybrid offspring, because their chromosomes don't match and can't pair properly during the process that produces sex cells such as eggs and sperm. But sometimes a genetic blip can produce sex cells with double the normal number of chromosomes, side-stepping the problem. If two sex cells of this type combine, a whole new fertile species with double the number of chromosomes is produced.

Doubling up

This rare 'duplication followed by fertilization' event has happened twice in the history of modern, common wheat. Around 30,000 years ago, a wild wheat (Triticum monococcum) hybridized with a species of goat grass (Aegilops speltoides) to generate primitive wheat called emmer, which had four sets of chromosomes. Then about 9,000 years ago, emmer wheat grown south of the Caspian Sea crossed with another wild goat grass (Aegilops tauschii) to produce a plant with six sets of chromosomes.

This hybrid had larger seeds than its ancestors, thanks to the bonus chromosomes, and so became a popular breed for early farmers. The descendents of these plants now cover more farmland globally than any other crop, filling more than 500 million acres worldwide.

But this genetic triumph came with a downside: the wheat was so popular that no one farmed anything else, leading to a very low genetic diversity and limiting the options for plant breeders hoping to develop varieties resistant to drought or pests. To counter this, researchers at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico have developed a way to top up bread wheat's shallow gene pool.

Something old, something new

"We've been re-enacting in the lab what took place in nature nine thousand years ago," says Richard Trethowan, a specialist in wheat breeding at CIMMYT. Researchers collected wild goat grass from the Middle East and crossed it with modern versions of emmer wheat to create bread wheat all over again. They used chemicals in the lab to induce the rare chromosome doubling that makes hybrids fertile.

The technique helps to introduce new genes in the same way as genetic engineering, but without requiring the researchers to know which genes they are on the lookout for beforehand.

The new bread wheats are not themselves suitable for farming, since most of the new hybrids have qualities that are more advantageous to grasses than to wheat. "They’re ugly things," says Trethowan. But he adds that it is easy to use traditional breeding methods to get the few useful genes into common bread wheat strains.

Food for thought

The genetic input has allowed improvements to wheat's drought resistance, for example. One wheat strain developed by the team produces between 20 and 40% more grain under dry conditions than traditional bread wheat, the researchers told an international symposium of plant breeders in December.

CIMMYT has sent seeds produced by the research out to centres worldwide for local testing and development, and initial results have been promising. Farmers in Ecuador are racing to switch to one test strain that significantly outperforms the established local wheat, Trethowan says. He predicts that in five or six years time the new genes found by reinventing wheat will be dramatically improving yields everywhere. "We're on the brink of quite a big genetic revolution for wheat breeding," says Trethowan.

John Snape, a cereal geneticist at the John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK, adds that rich countries will probably benefit from this revolution too. "It is likely that climates in Europe will get hotter and drier thanks to climate change, and this will put new stresses on crops," he says. One fungal wheat disease, Fusarium head blight, has already started to plague European fields thanks to warmer, more humid summers, he points out. "Being able to reach out into wild species for new genes to tackle these problems is very valuable," he says.

9 posted on 04/20/2006 3:55:57 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is silly, every right thinking person knows that the world is only 6000 years old.


10 posted on 04/20/2006 4:10:29 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson