Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southwest's Not Afraid to Talk Profit (Will codeshare on int'l flights)
TheStreet.com ^ | 4/20/2006 5:43 PM EDT | Ted Reed (TheStreet.com Staff Reporter)

Posted on 04/21/2006 1:14:22 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

A confident Southwest Airlines (LUV:NYSE) beat analysts' first-quarter targets Thursday and said it might very well meet or exceed its own goal of 15% earnings growth this year.

On top of that forecast, the carrier said it plans to grow its fleet as well, by exercising options for 79 additional Boeing jets.

Despite a 10% rise in unit costs, driven by sky-high fuel prices, the Dallas-based carrier made $61 million, or 7 cents a share, in the quarter, compared with $59 million, or 7 cents a share, a year earlier. Excluding hedging losses and gains, earnings rose to 8 cents a share from 5 cents last year, beating the Thomson Financial estimate by a penny.

Revenue rose 21% from a year ago to $2.02 billion, topping the $1.96 billion forecast from Wall Street.

During a conference call, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly told reporters and analysts that the airline's full-year goal remains 15% earnings growth, but that analysts' higher estimates of 71 cents a share for 2006 are achievable "if we can continue at this pace during the second, third and fourth quarters."

"It's not our forecast, but we're not telling you it is wrong either," Kelly said. He noted that he wants growth to come through increased passenger counts, rather than through ticket price increases, and he expressed doubt that Southwest could continue to raise fares without impacting demand for seats.

"With the airlines reporting so far, we're all talking about strong demand and high load factors, (and) my hope is we'll continue to see year-over-year load factor gains," Kelly said. "We've used modest fare increases historically, and that's what we would like to continue to do. You can push fares only so far [before] a negative effect and a backlash by customers."

The decision to exercise options for Boeing 737-700s from 2007 through 2012 means Southwest now has firm orders for 140 aircraft deliveries during the period, along with 116 options for deliveries from 2008 to 2012 and 54 purchase rights for delivery through 2014.

During the first quarter, Southwest said revenue passenger miles increased 15.4%, while available seat miles rose 9.1%, resulting in a 3.8-point increase in its load factor to 69.2%.

Yield per revenue passenger mile rose to 12.68 cents, up 5.4%. Revenue per available seat mile climbed 11.3% to 9.15 cents. Meanwhile, cost per available seat mile was 8.70 cents, up more than 11%.

CASM, excluding fuel, was down slightly from last year's 6.44 cents. Kelly said Southwest expects that its full-year CASM excluding fuel will be 6.48 cents, representing essentially no change in year-over-year costs.

CFO Laura Wright said Southwest continues to benefit from its hedging positions. For the rest of 2006, the airline has 70% of its fuel hedged at $36 a barrel. The company is 60% hedged for 2007, about 35% hedged for 2008 and 30% for 2009. She said the company is exploring a hedging strategy for 2009 and beyond.

Southwest's capital expenditures totaled $262 million for first quarter 2006. In January, the company's board authorized stock buybacks up to $300 million. As of Wednesday, the company had repurchased 15.4 million shares for $261 million. Southwest ended the quarter with $2.9 billion in cash and short-term investments.

Kelly said Southwest's plan to code-share on ATA international flights in 2009 means the company will build the capacity for international bookings into its reservation system, but he cautioned that his airline has no plans to fly overseas.

"I just don't want Southwest Airlines to be distracted," he said. "We have a lot of work to do on our domestic growth. Now is not the time to let up on our domestic route system development."


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: airlines; ata; southwest; soutwestairlines; swa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2006 1:14:27 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.

2 posted on 04/21/2006 1:16:57 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The feedlot of the air.


3 posted on 04/21/2006 1:18:21 PM PDT by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Still, I've been on SWA flights lately and I'd say their service is slipping. Staff are less courteous and a lot less patient. I'd say the new president is letting things go on the service side.

It seemed like Herb paid more attention to the subtleties of service in body language and tone as well as policy.
4 posted on 04/21/2006 1:19:02 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; expat_panama; Mase; nopardons

Kick butt and take names, Mr. Kelly. It's a pleasure to read about a company that appears to know how to "play."


5 posted on 04/21/2006 1:19:51 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

It's also the Old Country Buffet of the air too. I've been on America West, pretty much the same but with older planes and poorer customer service. Those two have the fattest, worst dressed people I've ever seen in my life.


6 posted on 04/21/2006 1:19:55 PM PDT by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Good news! Makes alot more sense than international service, which Kelly (to say nothing of Kelleher) are wholeheartedly against, even to Mexico and the Carribean.

There is a reason why they have only posted a quarterly loss only once over the past 30 years.

7 posted on 04/21/2006 1:20:05 PM PDT by Clemenza (Amor de mi Vida, Donde Estas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Southwest is certainly one of the remarkable success stories in aviation. Curiously, it is not that well known among aviation enthusiasts in Asia. I remember when (East and Southeast) Asia caught up on building low cost carriers like AirAsia or Tiger Airways about 3 or 4 years ago commentators commonly cited Ireland's Ryanair for expertise and model, and Southwest was rarely mentioned at all.


8 posted on 04/21/2006 1:20:32 PM PDT by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
It's also the Old Country Buffet of the air too.

Well at least it's not the Golden Corral of the air.

9 posted on 04/21/2006 1:23:35 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

LOL!


10 posted on 04/21/2006 1:24:56 PM PDT by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

It is a bit tight in the planes I must admit. But they are usually ontime. They are cheap, and they fly almost anywhere in the US. I use them almost exclusively.


11 posted on 04/21/2006 1:25:58 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Great company with superb management in a terrbile industry.

Management's latest initiative--A brilliant move to slowly and quitely enter the more profitable international markets (which they are currently doing) via the 'code-share' with ATA.

12 posted on 04/21/2006 1:29:34 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

"The feedlot of the air."

Well at least they are not asking their flight attendents to clean up the poop from the cabin after each flight off the clock for free like Delta is now.



13 posted on 04/21/2006 1:30:53 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

That's just wrong :( Hey why is the service going down hill? Did the airlines start out charging too little for their services years ago and they're trying to catch up?


14 posted on 04/21/2006 1:32:00 PM PDT by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
They ARE entering the lucrative international markets 'as we speak'. But they are doing it quietly and 'below the radar screen' via the 'code-share' with ATA.

This is a slick move by their deft management--as a way to get their foot in the door with minimum risk exposure. I think you'll see Southwest continually grow that international code-share until the day the Mr. Kelly alluded to--the day that they make the decision to fly those routes themselves. It's a great way to generate additional revenue, connecting passengers, brand exposure, and physical presence overseas at minimal cost and risk.

15 posted on 04/21/2006 1:38:44 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
It is a bit tight in the planes I must admit. But they are usually ontime. They are cheap, and they fly almost anywhere in the US.

I use them, too. 49 bucks one way, baby.

16 posted on 04/21/2006 1:40:13 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Ignore the drive-by media. Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I flew SWA lat year on business, $99 both ways.


17 posted on 04/21/2006 1:43:03 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I flew SWA lat year on business, $99 both ways.

That's a great price. If money were no object, I'd fly a luxury airline, but I work hard for my money, and domestic flights are very short.

18 posted on 04/21/2006 1:45:09 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Ignore the drive-by media. Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Southwest is a cattle car. I think of it as "riding the bus". I really don't like the constant jockeying for seats and having to wait around with a place in line instead of an assigned seat.The last time I took one of theirs, out of MDW, the flight was delayed for 3 hours while the airport was operating normally. All in all, it was wearying
19 posted on 04/21/2006 2:01:11 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

None are perfect. My first jet ride was DAL-HOU on WN way back in '74. They also allow GPS operation during cruise (sure helps pass the time enroute!).


20 posted on 04/21/2006 2:19:32 PM PDT by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson