Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1999, 2000 Iraqi memos: Procurement of 50000 Aluminum Tubes That Can Be Used For URANIUM ENRICHMENT.
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | April 24 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 04/24/2006 9:45:15 AM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last
To: jveritas

Good point!

I always believed Saddam was up to his eyeballs in WMD production. Of course living here in Vermont I have to defend that position everyday. Thanks for the clarification.


41 posted on 04/24/2006 10:30:59 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Another great job.

Send that great Clintoonian General Zinni a copy of this and ask him why he is now lying about what he said during the Clintoonian presidency.


42 posted on 04/24/2006 10:31:04 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is the link to IRaq Survey Gropu regarding the Aluminum Tubes. You can tell that they are not 100% sure of what these tubes were for but they lean toward that it was used for the 81 mm rockets.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html#sect6

43 posted on 04/24/2006 10:31:14 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

No problem. I do not know if the ISG thought about the same thing, i.e. why does Saddam need 50,000 81 mm caliber Howitzer?!


44 posted on 04/24/2006 10:32:33 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I am missing something here. Why isn't this a request for rocket tubes?


45 posted on 04/24/2006 10:34:06 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; bannedfromdu; Beckwith; ...

Timely translation by jveritas.

How would Zinni spin and lie about this?


46 posted on 04/24/2006 10:34:49 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
but if you combine the tubes, 500 tons of uranium at Tuwaitha, Mahdi Obeidi's book The Bomb in my Garden, and A.Q. Khan's proliferation of nuclear know-how across the Middle East, it's a short trip to realization.

Unless you are Barbara Boxer, Dick Turdbin, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Leaky Leahy, Joe Biden, Joe Wilson, Richard Clarke, Wesley Clark, Kos, Babs Streisand, Arrianna Huffington, Al Franken, Randi Rhodes, Chris Matthews, Dana Priest, Dana Milbanks, Katie Couric, etc. etc.

And if you are the ilk of the above mentioned socialist liberals, you don't have the sense that God gave a goat anyway.

47 posted on 04/24/2006 10:35:22 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Arrest Mary McCarthy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

That what the ISG think but why does Saddam needs 50,000 81 mm Rocket Launchers? Do you know about any army in the world that has 50,000 81 mm Howitzer launcher?


48 posted on 04/24/2006 10:35:54 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

No argument here.


49 posted on 04/24/2006 10:41:35 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: michaelt

The letter states the inner diameter is 74.4mm. Is that still suitable for 81 mm rockets?


50 posted on 04/24/2006 10:44:47 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I will try and find the name of that show. It was SO informative. Musharef of Pakistan forced AQ Kahn to apologize to the nation for his underground Nuclear workshop and distribution when Pakistan didn't want other nations to have the bomb or the technology. Iran specifically benefited from AQ Kahn and in the documentary, they show how Kahns smaller tubes for the enrichment process enables them to be hidden much easier. Such as the underground Iranian facilities we hear about.


51 posted on 04/24/2006 10:47:08 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the ping!


52 posted on 04/24/2006 10:47:27 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

ping


53 posted on 04/24/2006 10:53:23 AM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
---That what the ISG think but why does Saddam needs 50,000 81 mm Rocket Launchers? Do you know about any army in the world that has 50,000 81 mm Howitzer launcher?---

This begs the question. How many tubes for centrifuges are need for nuclear weapons quantity uranium enrichment?

54 posted on 04/24/2006 10:57:22 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

So the MSM's rant that there were no WMDs is literally going down the TUBE?


55 posted on 04/24/2006 10:58:21 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Do you know what is the percentage of the Iraqi ammunition inspected by the Iraqi Survey Group to check for WMD?

Answer: Less than one quarter on one percent.

Do you know how many ammunitions depots the ISG surveyed?

Answer: 11

Do you know from those 11 ammunition depots how many of them did they really inspect for WMD?

Answer: 2.

Sounds incredible to make a final report based on the above, but they did exactly that!

Please see attached

http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5.html#sect6

56 posted on 04/24/2006 10:58:26 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Exactly. If Germany was not working with Saddam Regime why did the Iraqi even bother to think of buying these tubes from them.
57 posted on 04/24/2006 10:59:50 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: avacado
I think it was the huge number of tubes that rose the suspicion first in 2002 that the tubes were going to be used for Uranium Enrichment purposes.
58 posted on 04/24/2006 11:01:34 AM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I hate to be the wet blanket but NONE OF THIS STUFF MATTERS TO LEFTIES!!!

Nothing short of a picture of Saddam making out with Bin Laden with 100 A-Bombs in the background will make them say Bush was right. Even that they would ignore if some dingbat like Joe Wilson told them to.


59 posted on 04/24/2006 11:03:54 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Great job! National Review's Corner blog is linking it!!
60 posted on 04/24/2006 11:04:01 AM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson