Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
4.25.06 | Mia T

Posted on 04/25/2006 8:42:48 AM PDT by Mia T

 

HEAR CLINTON! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
('MY 9/11 LOSER DEAL IS FULBRIGHT'S FAULT... AND I DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' NOBEL.*)
*If a loser like Carter can get one, where's mine already?'

by Mia T, 4.24.06





LISTEN CAREFULLY TO THE AUDIO: Fulbrighters' gasps of horror follow clinton's "I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'  I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak...."

I suspect the horror was provoked not by the (proven) fecklessness and recklessness and rigidity and danger of the purported clinton 'terrorism policy' or even by the absurdity of the argument; I suspect the gasps of horror were in response, rather, to the Kill-Bill kind of violence (albeit "virtual") contained in bill clinton's words.

God save us from people who do the morally right thing. It's always the rest of us who get broken in half.

--Paddy Chayefsky

 

And God save us from the morally unencumbered clintons, who get us broken in half nonetheless. --Mia T




'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
THE ADDRESS
THE (oops!) TRUTH


"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 6

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... 1

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

 

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer




"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live



"You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards.  I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office.  In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week."

Bill Schneider
CNN
reporting on the Fulbright Prize
April 14, 2006

 

 

 

WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.

Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated
Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby

 

 

 

There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.

AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL

 


 

 

At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Mia T
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers


 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE



 







hat the loser is up to here:


  1. Sheltered by a messy war, rising gas prices and a tanking president, haunted by his own failed, dysfunctional presidency and longing for the ultimate mulligan, the 'peacenik' draft-dodging proximate cause of 9/11 intensifies the Left's Tet-Offensive gambit replay...

  2. as he claims he ignored terrorism on purpose, which he actually did; but not for PEACE, as he claims. Rather, it was his obsession, his ultimate validation (in his own mind, anyway)--the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE--that in the end produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled him (and his wife) to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
    .

  3. Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward. It is no surprise, therefore, that bill clinton blames his failure to confront terrorism on his eponymous mentor, the-dead-and-defenseless-as-a-doornail Arkansas senator, J. William Fulbright. Clinton's simplistic leap from Cold War to asymmetric netherworlds and his shameless choice of venue are the product of unbridled egoism and contempt.

Biography lends to death a new terror.--Oscar Wilde

  

Hypocrisy abounds in this Age of Clinton, a Postmodern Oz rife with constitutional deconstruction and semantic subversion, a virtual surreality polymarked by presidential alleles peccantly misplaced or, in the case of Jefferson posthumously misappropriated...

Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON

   

Yesterday, Daniel Patrick Moynihan died. Today, the clintons are arrogating his soul. Hardly surprising. In 1999, the clintons were not at all shy about seizing his still-warm senate seat.

One has merely to recall the Jefferson double-helix hoax to understand that posthumous misappropriation is, for the obvious reason, the clintons' preferred method of legacy inflation….

Standard-Issue clintonism

If misappropriation of Jefferson's alleles hinged on a broken line of descent, misappropriation of Moynihan's endorsement depends on a broken line of dissent. Like Sally Hemmings' progeny, Moynihan's later acquiescence is of dubious lineage

Mia T, Moynihan Myths


Carpe Mañana: The clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')


FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

 

by Mia T, 04.18.06

 


 

 




"But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 

So anytime somebody said in my presence, "Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak," I always asked the same question for eight years, Can we kill 'em tomorrow? 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak....

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

Bill Clinton, the Sultan of Swing, gave an interesting speech last week, apropos foreign policy: "Anytime somebody said in my presidency, 'If you don't do this people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' If we can kill 'em tomorrow, then we're not weak, and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way."

The trouble was tomorrow never came - from the first World Trade Center attack to Khobar Towers to the African embassy bombings to the USS Cole. Manana is not a policy. The Iranians are merely the latest to understand that.

Reason Enough To Act
BY MARK STEYN
The New York Sun
April 17, 2006

 






or the clintons
to succeed, Bush must fail, which means America must lose THE WAR.

Make no mistake: The undermining of Bush and America is the number one clinton imperative.2

DEFINING DEVIANCY DOWN

The clintons typically prop themselves up by revising others down.3 Direct, upward revision of their own legacy is virtually impossible to pull off,4 given their wide-reaching unsavory renown.5

But the clintons' inflated sense of self causes them from time to time to dispense with rational thought and attempt to do just this; and so we get the clinton mañanas.

PURPOSEFUL FAILURE

First clinton claimed he got impeached on purpose. To save the Constitution, he said. Now he claims he failed to confront terrorism on purpose. Because we can kill 'em tomorrow, he says.

NOTE: The clintons did fail to confront terrorism on purpose, but not for the reason stated.5 (Indeed, contrary to clinton's absurd argument, the clintons' feckless inaction (and feckless action, for that matter,) were precisely the sign of weakness that emboldened bin Laden and al Qaeda.1 Bin Laden told us so himself.

 

Lopez: In sum, how many times did Bill Clinton lose bin Laden?

 

Miniter: Here's a rundown. The Clinton administration:

1. Did not follow-up on the attempted bombing of Aden marines in Yemen.

2. Shut the CIA out of the 1993 WTC bombing investigation, hamstringing their effort to capture bin Laden.

3. Had Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a key bin Laden lieutenant, slip through their fingers in Qatar.

4. Did not militarily react to the al Qaeda bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

5. Did not accept the Sudanese offer to turn bin Laden.

6. Did not follow-up on another offer from Sudan through a private back channel.

7. Objected to Northern Alliance efforts to assassinate bin Laden in Afghanistan.

8. Decided against using special forces to take down bin Laden in Afghanistan.

9. Did not take an opportunity to take into custody two al Qaeda operatives involved in the East African embassy bombings. In another little scoop, I am able to show that Sudan arrested these two terrorists and offered them to the FBI. The Clinton administration declined to pick them up and they were later allowed to return to Pakistan.

10. Ordered an ineffectual, token missile strike against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory.

11. Clumsily tipped off Pakistani officials sympathetic to bin Laden before a planned missile strike against bin Laden on August 20, 1998. Bin Laden left the camp with only minutes to spare.

12-14. Three times, Clinton hesitated or deferred in ordering missile strikes against bin Laden in 1999 and 2000.

15. When they finally launched and armed the Predator spy drone plane, which captured amazing live video images of bin Laden, the Clinton administration no longer had military assets in place to strike the archterrorist.

16. Did not order a retaliatory strike on bin Laden for the murderous attack on the USS Cole.


READ MORE
FOOTNOTES



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: albright; bill; billclinton; binladen; clinton; corruption; elections; fifthanniversary; fulbright; gwot; hillary; incompetence; incompetent; killbill; losingbinladen; nobel; nobelpeaceprize; pathto911; terrorism; terrorists; treason; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-78 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2006 8:42:56 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jla

the audio ping


2 posted on 04/25/2006 8:46:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...

ping


3 posted on 04/25/2006 8:47:43 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump.


4 posted on 04/25/2006 8:48:36 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Terrific thread.

And terrifying.


5 posted on 04/25/2006 8:50:55 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Clinton's a dunce, but I don't hear a single gasp of horror after his comment.

Maybe it's me.


6 posted on 04/25/2006 8:56:31 AM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Mia T

Mega-Dittoes for the great post. It saddens me to see how Libs turn the other cheek to those hell bent on our destruction.
I appreciate Mia T reminding everyone why our current foreign policy is in place and what helped shape it.


7 posted on 04/25/2006 8:56:42 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("Consensus is the absence of leadership" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

thanx :)


8 posted on 04/25/2006 9:00:20 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC

It's there. Maybe it's your speakers. ;)


9 posted on 04/25/2006 9:01:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Thank you :)


10 posted on 04/25/2006 9:08:55 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

For your diligence bump.


11 posted on 04/25/2006 9:16:13 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

No Mia T, all the thanks goes to you. I eliminated all of my "Clinton was a traitor" links in favor of your FR home page.
Such a plethora of information to arm the truth seekers against the drive by media. God Bless and Godspeed.


12 posted on 04/25/2006 9:16:33 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("Consensus is the absence of leadership" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
Thank you. :)

You might also want to link to
deletehillary.com.
13 posted on 04/25/2006 9:21:11 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thirty days until I see Natalie MacMaster again bump!


14 posted on 04/25/2006 9:29:16 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Wow!


15 posted on 04/25/2006 9:40:22 AM PDT by FARS (OK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I will indeed, we need all the ammo ready for Senator Cankles.


16 posted on 04/25/2006 9:41:04 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("Consensus is the absence of leadership" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

What a son of a bitch.


17 posted on 04/25/2006 9:44:12 AM PDT by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FARS

thx :)


18 posted on 04/25/2006 9:44:58 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

thx again :)


19 posted on 04/25/2006 9:50:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freema

I can't argue with that. ;)


20 posted on 04/25/2006 10:21:45 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
CORRECTION:

  1. Sheltered by a messy war, rising gas prices and a tanking president, haunted by his own failed, dysfunctional presidency and longing for the ultimate mulligan, the peacenik-posing, draft-dodging proximate cause of 9/11 intensifies the Left's Tet-Offensive gambit replay...

21 posted on 04/25/2006 10:30:31 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

ping


22 posted on 04/25/2006 10:35:55 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

ping


23 posted on 04/25/2006 10:59:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Pre-haircut bump


24 posted on 04/25/2006 11:44:27 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jla

I need one too bump ;)


25 posted on 04/25/2006 12:21:47 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


26 posted on 04/25/2006 12:22:57 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC
As for your first point:
Clinton's a dunce

So is the other one....

 

Hillary-the-person isn't running. The idea of hillary is, the idea of hillary as put out on a daily basis by all manner of proxy, from simple spinner to elaborate Hollywood production.1

QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world"2 partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one.3

Hillary-the-person never shows her face. Hillary-the-person never talks. Part of the reason is substance-- or more precisely, the lack of it: The clintons are a truly banal bunch. But, as the husband amply demonstrates, banality, in and of itself, is not a nonstarter if you have a semblance of style. But, sadly, missus clinton doesn't have that, either.

The upshot of all this vacuity are positive numbers for hillary (such as they are) that are inversely related to appearance frequency, and, more specifically, inversely related to the following... variables....

The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.
5

So when hillary-the-person has a problem, for example, she stays hidden and in her place dispatches her prevaricators to spin us silly. Harold Wolfson is the current model.

 

 

If the problem has already taken root, she plants false news stories about it. (Missus clinton's sorry sock-puppet status falls into this category.) 6

It is only when her power, treasure or freedom appears in imminent danger does she deign7 to put the lie10 in our face herself.8

SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
4
by Mia T, 3.22.06
FOOTNOTES


27 posted on 04/25/2006 12:35:34 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

What's your take on Kean the younger's chances?


28 posted on 04/25/2006 12:37:33 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jla

Really? That's great. Where's she performing?


29 posted on 04/25/2006 12:48:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I don't like him personally but think that a RINO is better than a full blown lib anyday.
His platform on abortion, gun control, same sex marriage hardly make him conservative but he is still better than Menendez.
I must add that the crazy Democrats and the "Gay American" Governor who played with our safety drove me from the state.
I have moved to Texas recently and the grass really is greener on the other side!
NJ is the armpit of America politically and the voters reap what they sow.


30 posted on 04/25/2006 12:57:38 PM PDT by JerseyDvl ("Consensus is the absence of leadership" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Darn. I thought you were a vote. ;)

I agree with your thinking.


31 posted on 04/25/2006 1:06:48 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


32 posted on 04/25/2006 2:39:48 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Menendez is up to his eyeballs in Trenton corruption.


33 posted on 04/25/2006 2:44:24 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

...which is perfectly fine with Corzine.


34 posted on 04/25/2006 2:45:46 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

likely de rigueur


35 posted on 04/25/2006 2:46:42 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Really? That's great. Where's she performing?

Down in Norfolk, her next venue after Carnegie Hall, in case any NY'ers may be interested in seeing one of the most talented fiddlers that has ever graced this planet .
By the way, did you know Thomas J played the fiddle? He paid the expense of having an Italian virtuoso, whose name I forget now, come to Monticello to teach Mr. J and his girls.

36 posted on 04/25/2006 2:57:25 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


37 posted on 04/25/2006 3:29:40 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

thx :)


38 posted on 04/25/2006 3:36:33 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

So much excellent work here; save!/ bttt


39 posted on 04/25/2006 3:51:51 PM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

thanx :)


40 posted on 04/25/2006 4:52:29 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

bump


41 posted on 04/25/2006 5:00:25 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jla

The concert sounds wonderful. (no pun intended) :)

That's what I love about TJ. He wasn't intimidated by any speciality. Cynics might dismiss it as dilettantism... or even arrogance, but I don't see it that way.


42 posted on 04/25/2006 7:47:35 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

thx again


43 posted on 04/25/2006 10:00:06 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jla

it was right under my nose, so to speak. ;)


44 posted on 04/25/2006 10:02:39 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC

The gasps occur right after clinton says, " I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'"


45 posted on 04/25/2006 10:13:25 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC; All

BTW, the phrase,"I always asked the same question for eight years" confirms clinton's essential stupidity.

I imagine he thought that by underscoring what is perhaps the longest running and most reckless continuous failure by a president, and laying the blame for it on poor dead-as-a-doornail Fulbright, he would somehow transform this malpractice and malfeasance into Nobel material. What a self-serving, arrogant fool.


46 posted on 04/25/2006 10:24:31 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jla; UWSrepublican

fyi


47 posted on 04/25/2006 10:30:56 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

any culture shock? NJ to TX: That's a big difference.


48 posted on 04/25/2006 10:34:12 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

fyi


49 posted on 04/26/2006 3:38:16 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

self-serving, arrogant fool
fyi


50 posted on 04/26/2006 3:40:12 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson