[inquest]

But that's exactly the message conservatives will send to the world if they stay at home this November.

You're right. Staying home is stupid. I intend to vote third-party instead.

It was conservatives who got Bush to change his mind on Harriet Meirs.

And do you think he would have if he knew there was no chance of said conservatives bolting in '06?

[RobbyS]

Well. Perot was right about NAFTA. On the other hand, he gave us eight years of Bill Clinton. Choose your poison.

[Dog Gone]

Staying home is stupid. I intend to vote third-party instead.

BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

[MikefromOhio]

well have fun getting your guy 1% or so...

I just hope it doesn't cost an election and I hope you would RATHER try to work to get a conservative elected within the established party.

It can happen.

It's working out in Ohio right now in the Governor's race.

Nah you know what, I don't care, do what you want. You have your vote, you will do what you want with it. But I can't WAIT to hear the screaming the day after the elections if current trends hold.

[FreeReign]

I intend to vote third-party instead.

I guessing that you voted third party in '86?

[pepperdog]

"You're right. Staying home is stupid. I intend to vote third-party instead."

What an original idea! Wait, no it isn't! I believe that's the way we got Bill Clinton for eight years and just about destroyed this country. I guess you'll be happy to see Hillary complete the job.

I couldn't believe it when many conservatives voted for the third party ticket--TWICE! And I am astounded that it would be considered the thing to do less than six years later. Don't people ever learn (rhetorical question).

You are kidding yourself if you think there is a third party strong enough to win against the Democrats.

[varon]

You're right. Staying home is stupid. I intend to vote third-party instead.

Ditto