Skip to comments.
'UNITED 93' vs. 'MUNICH' (Paul Greengrass--thank the stars--is no Steven Spielberg)
5.09.06
| Mia T
Posted on 05/09/2006 1:38:59 AM PDT by Mia T
|
'UNITED 93' vs. 'MUNICH' Paul Greengrass--thank the stars--is no Steven Spielberg
- by Mia T, 5.09.06

hereas both 'United 93' and 'Munich' derive their initial tension not from uncertainty but from what we already know, one movie remains scrupulously true to the facts--art in the service of history--while the other quickly devolves into a verisimilitudinous contrivance in the service of a director's political agenda.
Paradoxically--poetic justice in its purest form, some would say--the honest movie is the one that ultimately delivers the powerful political message.
Spoken by its heros--our heros--as they prepare to rush the cockpit, shortly before the plane meant for the White House plunges into a Pennsylvania field instead, the simple but powerful words are these:
- "No one is going to help us. We've got to do it ourselves."
- "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
|
CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND
January 9, 2006 Reviewer: miat22 (Mia T)
... to borrow a phrase, perversely, from a Spielberg flick about benign intelligence.
Munich, with its false premises, phony pieties and outright lies -- Spielberg fantasy wrapped in sober documentary -- is a verisimilitudinous contrivance that is pernicious, especially now, especially here, especially if we understand Spielberg's real motivation.
Truth matters not at all to Spielberg, and courage matters even less. To advance his fallacious argument, he has Golda Meir speak words she never said, never would have said and, obviously, cannot now disavow. Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward.
Munich is less about Meir avenging the Munich massacre than it is about Bush waging the War on Terror. The historical Munich allusion of appeasement, self-loathing and psychologizing that is practiced so fastidiously by the American Left today is key to understanding Spielberg.
The core of his anti-war argument: By fighting back, we become our enemy. Ironically, with Munich, the same can now be said of Spielberg.
Is Spielberg humanizing the terrorist really any different from Riefenstahl humanizing Hitler? If anything, Spielberg is more contemptible. Whereas Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Spielberg is self-actuated and aware.
 Hollywood is DreamWorks, fantastical and unthinking and solipsistic by definition.
To mitigate its danger, people capable of critical thinking must take on Hollywood... and must do so in Hollywood venues.
The printed word, sad to say, no longer carries the day.
My New York Times Review of Munich Was this review helpful to you? VOTE HERE
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006 |
|
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."

CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
by Mia T, 4.24.06

|
LISTEN CAREFULLY TO THE AUDIO: Fulbrighters' gasps of horror follow clinton's "I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow? If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak...."
I suspect the horror was provoked not by the (proven) fecklessness and recklessness and rigidity and danger of the purported clinton 'terrorism policy' or even by the absurdity of the argument; I suspect the gasps of horror were in response, rather, to the Kill-Bill kind of violence (albeit "virtual") contained in bill clinton's words.
-
- God save us from people who do the morally right thing. It's always the rest of us who get broken in half.
-
--Paddy Chayefsky
And God save us from the morally unencumbered clintons, who get us broken in half nonetheless. --Mia T
|
|
'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' THE ADDRESS
|
THE (oops!) TRUTH
|

"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....
But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak. And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 6
So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow? If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... 1
I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright. Listening."
bill clinton Fulbright Prize address April 12, 2006
|
"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.
We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].
At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.
So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."
bill clinton Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002 Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio: I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer
"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'
I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."
bill clinton Sunday, Sept 3, 2002 Larry King Live
- "You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."
hillary clinton Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006 Chitchat with Jane Pauley San Francisco, CA
|
- ... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards. I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office. In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.
-
bill clinton Fulbright Prize address April 12, 2006
|
- "Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week."
-
Bill Schneider CNN reporting on the Fulbright Prize April 14, 2006
-
-
-
- WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.
-
Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated Friday, October 13, 2000 By Rita Cosby
-
-
-
- There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.
-
AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL
-
-
-
- At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.
Mia T Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers
|
|
This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.
Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.
According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.
Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.
If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
READ MORE
|
|

hat the loser is up to here:
- Sheltered by a messy war, rising gas prices and a tanking president, haunted by his own failed, dysfunctional presidency and longing for the ultimate mulligan, the peacenik-posing, draft-dodging proximate cause of 9/11 intensifies the Left's Tet-Offensive gambit
replay...
- as he claims he ignored terrorism on purpose, which he actually did; but not for PEACE, as he claims. Rather, it was the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE--his obsession, his ultimate validation (in his own mind, anyway)--that in the end produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled him (and his wife) to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
- Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward. It is no surprise, therefore, that bill clinton blames his failure to confront terrorism on his eponymous mentor, the-dead-and-defenseless-as-a-doornail Arkansas senator, J. William Fulbright. Clinton's simplistic (and cynical--note the caveat) leap from Cold War to asymmetric netherworlds and his shameless choice of venue are the product of unbridled egoism and contempt.
-
- Biography lends to death a new terror.--Oscar Wilde
Hypocrisy abounds in this Age of Clinton, a Postmodern Oz rife with constitutional deconstruction and semantic subversion, a virtual surreality polymarked by presidential alleles peccantly misplaced or, in the case of Jefferson posthumously misappropriated...
-
Mia T, THE OTHER NIXON
Yesterday, Daniel Patrick Moynihan died. Today, the clintons are arrogating his soul. Hardly surprising. In 1999, the clintons were not at all shy about seizing his still-warm senate seat.
One has merely to recall the Jefferson double-helix hoax to understand that posthumous misappropriation is, for the obvious reason, the clintons' preferred method of legacy inflation
.
Standard-Issue clintonism
If misappropriation of Jefferson's alleles hinged on a broken line of descent, misappropriation of Moynihan's endorsement depends on a broken line of dissent. Like Sally Hemmings' progeny, Moynihan's later acquiescence is of dubious lineage
-
Mia T, Moynihan Myths
|
-
-
READ MORE
|

|
ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)
ALBRIGHT1: 'Bin Laden and his Network Declared War2 on the United States and Struck First and We Have Suffered Deeply'
by Mia T, 4.28.06

|
This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.
Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.
According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.
Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.
If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
|
READ MORE
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: appeasement; billclinton; clinton; clintonism; greengrass; hillary; hillary06; hillary08; hillaryclinton; munich; spielberg; terrorism; theterrorismstupid; united93; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-62 next last
1
posted on
05/09/2006 1:39:05 AM PDT
by
Mia T
To: Gail Wynand
2
posted on
05/09/2006 1:46:29 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...
3
posted on
05/09/2006 1:48:46 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JustPiper
4
posted on
05/09/2006 1:53:55 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Wolverine
5
posted on
05/09/2006 1:58:07 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
6
posted on
05/09/2006 2:10:15 AM PDT
by
Brian Allen
(Life's only certainties include the absolute corruption of those who collect and spend our taxes.)
To: Mia T
<< Truth matters not at all to Spielberg, and courage matters even less ...... [His] Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward. >>
And therein lies the liberals' rub.
That evil is but the absence of truth and cowardice its definitive identifier.
7
posted on
05/09/2006 2:19:12 AM PDT
by
Brian Allen
(All that is required to ensure the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke)
To: Mia T
8
posted on
05/09/2006 3:09:41 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: Mia T
Mia T, great post as usual. Too bad not many Americans are going to see the outstanding, informative, educational, factual film "United 93". I expect the Democrat "traitor scum" to boycott it because they all live in complete denial and will be voting for their own deaths this November, but both Pubbies and Conservatives are not turning out in numbers one would of thought were there. Shame!!! America is going down!!!
To: Mia T
I saw the movie Sword of Gideon just a few days ago. I was stunned by how much, scene by scene, Spielberg lifted from that movie into making Munich. Fortunatley, it didn't include that stupid scene where Speilberg's Avner is having sex intercut with massive violence.
10
posted on
05/09/2006 3:48:04 AM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Mia T, great post as usual. Too bad not many Americans are going to see the outstanding, informative, educational, factual film "United 93". I expect the Democrat "traitor scum" to boycott it because they all live in complete denial and will be voting for their own deaths this November, but both Pubbies and Conservatives are not turning out in numbers one would of thought were there. Shame!!! America is going down!!!
The movie has not made it to my area yet, but Munich did so I saw it and thought it was good. I still for the life of me don't see what that movie did to people who are supposedly conservative. It was a movie where the Israelis killed the heck out of the palistinians. Is that a problem for you? BTW, I am looking forward to seeing "Flight 93" when I have the soonest opportunity. Maybe most people have not been able to see it yet. It did pretty well the opening weekend.
To: Mia T
Spielberg is a rich white ass.
13
posted on
05/09/2006 3:55:51 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: All
Oops. Make that heroes.
|
Spoken by its heroes--our heroes--as they prepare to rush the cockpit, shortly before the plane meant for the White House plunges into a Pennsylvania field instead, the simple but powerful words are these:
- "No one is going to help us. We've got to do it ourselves."
- "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
|
14
posted on
05/09/2006 5:32:09 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Brian Allen
15
posted on
05/09/2006 5:34:04 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: E.G.C.
16
posted on
05/09/2006 5:39:29 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JLAGRAYFOX
If or when it makes it to our town, we'll go.
17
posted on
05/09/2006 5:45:40 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
To: napscoordinator
*It was a movie where the Israelis killed the heck out of the palistinians. Is that a problem for you? *
Huh? Problem is the movie rewrites history and especially quotes Golda Meir who cannot defend herself since she is dead.....what could be worse and more cowardly than this?
I think Mia already said this. 93 United has not yet come out in my area either. I don't go to movie theaters normally but did for The Passion and will do so for this one. It is releasing this week.
Mia T always a pleasure to correspond with like minded people. Blessings,
18
posted on
05/09/2006 5:57:10 AM PDT
by
citizensgratitude
(Our Military, present & past, the Highest example of Brotherhood of Man and doing God's Will)
To: napscoordinator
My friend, Spielberg portrayed the Arab terrorist scum as human beings. They are not!!! They are animals!!! Now that does not include the great majority of Muslims who want to live in peace and raise their families with opportunities and love. But Spielberg is in for a surprise. When our Democrat Party friends get back in power, shortly thereafter, it will become open season on Americans at will. Mr. Spielberg and other American Jews will get a rude awakening. First his wife will be abused and raped in front of him, then his children will be shot in the back of the head "Taliban" style, and finally he will get the beheading treatment. This man and other American Jews are asses, fools and idiots, etc. Go figure!!! And....my friend before the Bin Laden crowd gets to us the Blacks, and Gays will go before us.
To: Strategerist
I guess you did not note of the airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon killing innocent Americans. Let me know how unconcerned you are after the first Nuke is set off here after the Democrat vermin get back into power. Now, Now, please, no complaints down the road. For you, all is hunky-dory!!! Take about denial!!!
To: Mia T
21
posted on
05/09/2006 6:23:50 AM PDT
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: JLAGRAYFOX
My friend, Spielberg portrayed the Arab terrorist scum as human beings. They are not!!! They are animals!!! Now that does not include the great majority of Muslims who want to live in peace and raise their families with opportunities and love. But Spielberg is in for a surprise. When our Democrat Party friends get back in power, shortly thereafter, it will become open season on Americans at will. Mr. Spielberg and other American Jews will get a rude awakening. First his wife will be abused and raped in front of him, then his children will be shot in the back of the head "Taliban" style, and finally he will get the beheading treatment. This man and other American Jews are asses, fools and idiots, etc. Go figure!!! And....my friend before the Bin Laden crowd gets to us the Blacks, and Gays will go before us.
Wow!!! That was pretty intense I must say. I think you should write a book or a movie. I would say it would be interesting.
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Too bad not many Americans are going to see the outstanding, informative, educational, factual film "United 93".
I expect the Democrat "traitor scum" to boycott it because they all live in complete denial and will be voting for their own
deaths this November, but both Pubbies and Conservatives are not turning out in numbers one would of thought were there.
Shame!!! America is going down!!! --JLAGRAYFOX
The turnout of the Right that counts is the one in November. This year and in '08. Both are equally critical.
Make no mistake: The only thing standing between the terrorists and our annihilation is the American Right.
|
The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2
- by Mia T, 4.6.03
- If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.
-
Mia T, THE ALIENS, June 9, 1999 Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000

l From is sounding the alarm.
"Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections." Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem. From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason. That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will
which means both in real time and historically. When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.) Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent. With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively
and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity. With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)
and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.
- ASIDE: Wartime Bush-bashing sedition of the pre-Howard Dean, pre-Cindy Sheehan variety, with its sotto-voce old-school indirection, refinement and politesse, sounds almost quaint these days.
The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.
-
|
-
|
America's Real Two-Front War by Mia T, 4.17.04

merica's real two-front war: fundamentalist Islam on the right and a fundamentally seditious clintonoid neo-neoliberalism on the left, both anarchic, both messianically, lethally intolerant, both amorally perverse, both killing Americans, both placing America at grave risk, both quite insane.
If we are to prevail, the rules of engagement--on both fronts--must change.
Marquis of Queensberry niceties, multicultural hypersensitivity, unipolar-power guilt, hegemony aversion (which is self-sabotage in the extreme--we must capture what we conquer--oil is the terrorist's lifeblood)... and, most important, the mutual-protection racket in Washington--pre-9/11 relics all--are luxuries we can no longer afford. Notwithstanding, the underlying premise of our hyperfastidious polity, (that we must remain in the system to save the system) is fallacious at best and tantamount to Lady Liberty lifting herself up by her own bootstraps. To borrow from the Bard, let's start metaphorically, or better yet, economically and politically, by killing all the seditious solicitors, which include the clintons and their left-wing agitprop-and-money-laundering machine: the Viacom-Simon & Schuster-60-Minutes vertical operation, the horizontal (as in "soporific") Cronkite-ite news readers, the (hardly upright) Ben-Veniste goons and Gorelick sleepers, and, of course, the clueless, cacophonic, disproportionately loud, left-coast Barbra-Streisand contingent. America must not pull her punches. To prevail, America must defeat--thoroughly destroy--her enemies. On both fronts. |
|
neo-neoliberalism n.  neocommunist political movement, a tipsy-topsy, infantile perversion of the Marxist-Leninist model, global in scope, beginning in the post-cold-war, unipolar 1990s, led by the '60s neoliberal baby-boomer "intelligentsia," that seeks power without responsibility, i.e., that seeks to dilute American power by concentrating power in said '60s neoliberals while yielding America's sovereignty to the United Nations, i.e., while surrendering to the terrorists, as it continues the traditional '60s neoliberal feint, namely: (1) concern for social justice, (2) distain for bureaucracy, and (3) the championing of entrepreneurship for the great unwashed.
-
Mia T, 2.24.04
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006 |
PARTY OF LINCOLN AND THE WAR ON TERROR
CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5
THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
Reverse Gorelick
sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)
WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE
ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE
(and doesn't even know it)
MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')
WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)
WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF) ~PART ONE~
ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)~PART TWO~
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF HILLARY AND JANE IN SAN FRANCISCO
HILLARY CLINTON VOTES FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BEFORE SHE VOTES AGAINST THEM
HEAR HER NOW
~SEE VIDEO~
IRAQI GENERAL: SADDAM MOVED WMD TO SYRIA BEFORE INVASION
(ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE, CINDY SHEEHAN)
THE 'BORED,' BEFUDDLED POLITICS OF JOHN KERRY RETURNS
CALLS FOR ALITO FILIBUSTER FROM 'SKI SLOPES'
CLINTON 'CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'
CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS:
Justice Undone in the clinton White House
clintonCORRUPTION: the more things change. . . .
ON WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND WIRETAPS:
THE ABYSMAL CONSTITUTIONAL RECORD OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON
REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT
ROCKEFELLER SEDITION: WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS?
THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY:
HOW DECADES OF CLINTON DOUBLE-DEALING COMPROMISED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY
DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN
DICK MORRIS:
CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI
My New York Times Review of Munich
CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND
(please FReep)
Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000
CHRIS MATTHEWS: 'BUSH BELONGS ON MOUNT RUSHMORE'
IF HE WINS 'GREATEST GAMBLE SINCE ROOSEVELT BACKED BRITAIN BEFORE WWII'
THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie
AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA
I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t
A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA
NEWT: CLINTON COMMITTED ONE OF WORST CRIMES, ENDANGERED COUNTRY, IF HIT ABDULLAH UP FOR CASH
Listen to this and ask yourself if America Ever Had the Remotest Chance Under a clinton to Avoid 9/11
(To paraphrase Einstein: "The unleashed power of terrorism has changed everything save our modes of thinking, and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophes.")
Is the 9/11 commission calling bill clinton's statement '"unreliable," or did it choose willful ignorance this time, too?
NANO-PRESIDENT, MEGA-DISASTER
history will not be kind to bill + hillary clinton
NANO-PRESIDENT
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux
'UNITED 93' vs. 'MUNICH'
Paul Greengrass--thank the stars--is no Steven Spielberg
Republican-voting, Hollywood-dwelling, Bill-Maher-writing Master of Tongue-in-Cheek, Paladin of Truth, Reviews 'United 93' AND Bill Clinton
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
HEY CLINTON!
SIZE DOESN'T MATTER.
HILLARY REMEMBERS
HILLARY DOES NOT RECALL, DOES NOT REMEMBER, HAS NO MEMORY, HAS NO RECOLLECTION, BUT DOES NOT BELIEVE SHE SAID IT BECAUSE SHE WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED IF SHE DID.
"I DON'T RECALL"
(THE CLINTONS COMMIT PERJURY WITH IMPUNITY)
KARL ROVE'S MAGNIFICENT OBSESSION: MOI
HEAR HILLARY, CHRIS MATTHEWS ET AL.
BILL MAHER WARNS DEMOCRATS:
HILLARY WILL TAKE YOU OVER A CLIFF IN '08
'REFUSAL TO LEVEL WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'
... IS HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON'S MIDDLE NAME
HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK
THE ABSURDITY OF A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY
HILLARY'S ARMOR: A decades-old story...
WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
|
(ICKES + ESTRICH PROVIDE ROADMAP--oops!--FOR HILLARY DEFEAT) |
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
December 7, 1941+64
IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)
IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL?
Yitzhak Shamir Validated: THE CLINTONS ARE "A GREAT DANGER TO JEWS"
for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power
REASON 1: SHE HIRED JAMIE GORELICK
HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall
HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
"What, me worry?"
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)
Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)
HILLARY IN AVIARY
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")
the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich
HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)
ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review
STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY
HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES
CINDY SHEEHAN:
MORE
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
23
posted on
05/09/2006 7:16:12 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Strategerist; All
24
posted on
05/09/2006 7:21:35 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Gail Wynand
25
posted on
05/09/2006 7:28:24 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JLAGRAYFOX
You are right: Spielberg belongs to a certain foolish subset of Jews;
but it is also true that none of us is immune from this deadly form of myopia borne of fear and arrogance and rigidity.
None of us must ignore or rationalize away threats to our existence.As a Jew, I tend to be vigilant about such threats.
|
FOREWORD: A note to the Religious Right I am not arguing that you change your deeply held convictions. To the contrary. Your convictions--the evangelical ethos-- is precisely my premise, my starting point. It is precisely why I cannot envision how you would doing anything to help elect hillary clinton, someone who is anathema to all you believe. But that is exactly what you would be doing if, in the next presidential election, you stay home or vote for a 'Perot.' You don't have to physically pull the lever or mark the box or touch the square next to the name 'hillary clinton' to help elect her. To think otherwise is to play with your mind. It is tempting to rationalize this issue... even to ignore it. It's a difficult issue. It's a dilemma. But rationalizing the issue won't make your actions morally right... and ignoring the issue won't make it go away. The clintons equate the Religious Right with the islamo-fascist terrorists, with the enemy. They are attempting to transfer onto the Religious Right the hate and fear and disgust Americans feel for the islamo-fascist terrorists. To disseminate their vile invective, the clintons chose a church for the venue and what the they believe to be a vulnerable, easily demagogued population for the audience. (A population they've exploited forever.) The purpose of this article is to inform you of the clintons' contemptible and dangerous scheme. To let you hear clinton for yourself. It is critical that you know fully what the clintons think of you and to what extremes they are willing to go to harm you, to defeat you, to crush you. You must not ignore or rationalize away this threat to your existence. As a Jew, I tend to be vigilant about such threats. I implore you to do likewise. You must not make the same mistake my brethren made almost seven decades ago. READ MORE
|
WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY: CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS
by Mia T, 03.16.06

It is wrong to demonize and cartoonize one another and ignore evidence and to make false charges and to bear false witness. Sometimes I think our friends on the other side have become the people of the Nine Commandments. It is wrong to bear false witness because we all see through [the] glass darkly....We have a curious situation in American where the religious right has tried to turn all who disagree with them into two-dimensional cartoons. I read a very moving article in one of our newspapers a few days ago in which someone in the president's hometown said all the Democrats cared about was abortion, gay marriage, and being weak on defense.... [T]hese people really do believe they are in possession of absolute truths. You won't hear about it during this convention. They'll put up their other face. But the truth is that when it all comes down to it, a lot of the religious absolutists believe that all other issues are irrelevant, that all who disagree with them are somehow almost non human, certainly not deserving of basic consideration. Therefore it's nothing but right to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of those who share their values and to constantly assert that whatever position they decide to take is right regardless of the inconvenient evidence.... Our number one threat abroad is fundamentalism, absolutism. Terror is their tactic, but it is their ideas, their hatred, their absolute certainty that they are so right that they can kill people who disagree with them -- that is our enemy.
-
'All of Us See Through the Glass Darkly' bill clinton sermon at Riverside Church before the start of the Republican convention, 2004

linton moral relativism meets an insidious balkanizing brand of clinton fundamentalism. The goal: to render the corrupt, treacherous, utter-failure clintons at once untouchable and empowered.
SERMON ON THE MAKE
Note that clinton made this despicable argument in a church. In a black church. So much for the separation of church and state. So much for racial equality and respect. Miss hillary's plantation prequel....
- Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a white man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing.
-
Mia T, 07.23.05 THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT? clinton legacy of lynching update
As for fundamentalism, note that no one is more doctrinaire than the clintons. If the Religious Right eschews science for faith, the clintons corrupt science* for dogma, treasure and power. * More on that later.... |
26
posted on
05/09/2006 7:54:49 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: bmwcyle
27
posted on
05/09/2006 8:01:19 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Cindy
28
posted on
05/09/2006 8:08:08 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: UWSrepublican
29
posted on
05/09/2006 8:10:55 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: YaYa123
30
posted on
05/09/2006 8:33:09 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: BARBRA
31
posted on
05/09/2006 8:34:19 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
I agree with you completely. My statement about Jews, Gays and Blacks comes from my lengthy stays in Israel, Kuwait and Oman, where I became privy to the thoughts of both Israeli Jews and Arabs of all stripes. My Arab associates hate Jews, want to kill them all, no matter what, ditto for Gays, and absolutely detest Blacks. Now, there are many Arabs, etc. of color, but they draw a dividing line, believing that anyone in sub-sahara Africa of Black color is not a human being!!! Sad to say, that is the way it is. Many Americans, sad to say also, of all political stripes are living in total denial of the danger that is about to befall them!!! They are not good or effective students of history, either!!! Methinks they are about to pay a heavy price for their inattention and follishness!!!
To: JLAGRAYFOX
33
posted on
05/09/2006 11:04:16 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
34
posted on
05/09/2006 11:04:33 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(So say your fond farewells! Mecha means fuse, and it is lit !)
To: JustPiper
35
posted on
05/09/2006 11:26:05 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
"Bump to the top!"
36
posted on
05/09/2006 12:53:04 PM PDT
by
jla
To: jla
37
posted on
05/09/2006 2:10:14 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
I've always found the pleasure to be mine in helping out a lady.
38
posted on
05/09/2006 3:21:13 PM PDT
by
jla
To: jla
39
posted on
05/09/2006 5:52:50 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
40
posted on
05/09/2006 6:40:19 PM PDT
by
jla
To: Mia T
I thought Spielberg was great in The Blues Brothers. ;)
41
posted on
05/09/2006 6:46:28 PM PDT
by
RobRoy
To: jla
Oscar Wilde put it well: A true gentleman is one who is never unintentionally rude.
42
posted on
05/09/2006 6:56:10 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
Oscar Wilde liked to wear women's clothes, so I must dismiss anything he had said.
...and besides, I was being facetious, and a bit mischievous.
But I bet you Audrey Hepburn would've laughed at my riposte.
43
posted on
05/09/2006 7:09:10 PM PDT
by
jla
To: jla
Fox hunting is big in Virginia, isn't it?
Oscar Wilde also noted that a gentleman galloping after a fox is the unspeakable in full pursuit of the uneatable. ;)
44
posted on
05/09/2006 7:18:10 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
I doubt the fox was O. Wilde's prey of choice.
But I apologize, sincerely, if I've offended you.
45
posted on
05/09/2006 7:30:36 PM PDT
by
jla
To: Mia T
ABC PULLS THE PLUG ON HILLARYS PREZ PLANS
Commander in Chief was not a TV series in the usual sense. Rather it was a nationally-televised focus group, designed to test out issues, talking points, and applause lines for Hillary Clintons stealth presidential campaign.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Roberts/carey116.htm
46
posted on
05/10/2006 12:53:10 AM PDT
by
JustPiper
(So say your fond farewells! Mecha means fuse, and it is lit !)
To: jla
Apologize for what? Your only offensive move that I'm aware of is all that zoysia-ing. ;)
47
posted on
05/10/2006 3:58:04 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JustPiper
48
posted on
05/10/2006 9:11:42 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: pbrown; All
49
posted on
05/10/2006 3:50:43 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JLAGRAYFOX
50
posted on
05/10/2006 5:21:44 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson