Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/17/2006 6:16:05 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: xzins

Excellent news.


2 posted on 05/17/2006 6:16:28 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

What about the Kurds?


3 posted on 05/17/2006 6:17:28 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

What a genius Rove is, tax reduction, forced immigration into limelight, now Iraq seems to be coming together, amazing.


6 posted on 05/17/2006 6:19:08 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Wonderful news! Hope it works out.


7 posted on 05/17/2006 6:19:32 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
This is a very good expected development.

Notice how the MSM has stopped taking the "Bush Polls" since he been kickin butt!

Don't expect another poll for quite some time now.
8 posted on 05/17/2006 6:20:15 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; All

All of this happening in a middle of a upcoming civil war that is going to happen anytime soon..


9 posted on 05/17/2006 6:20:21 AM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Wonder how it'll get watered down by the drive by media?
13 posted on 05/17/2006 6:22:56 AM PDT by b4its2late (If it's treason, there's no doubt a democrat is standing behind it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
YEAH BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BORDERS!~
(OFF SARCASM)
15 posted on 05/17/2006 6:23:19 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

WOW! good to hear.


21 posted on 05/17/2006 6:25:46 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Good news! I hope it is successful.


27 posted on 05/17/2006 6:27:14 AM PDT by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; mystery-ak; silent_jonny; GretchenM; Wolfstar; snugs; ohioWfan

Ping. :)


28 posted on 05/17/2006 6:27:40 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I hope one of the White House reporters asks Tony about it today in his press briefing.

If they don't ask, I am sure Tony will somehow get the information into the conversation.

30 posted on 05/17/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Way back in 1981 - I graduated from a military college. I played soccer for 4 years with both Iraqi and Iranian transfer students - they were great guys.

The Iranians had to go home when the Ayotollah took power - he threatened their families if they didn't come home. When they arrived home - they were shot - along with their families.

The Iraqis (as far as I know) are still alive in Iraq.

I wish them the best - I hope this government can make a run at it.

Good luck guys.


31 posted on 05/17/2006 6:30:01 AM PDT by Jake The Goose (To my friend in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Sounds like a quagmire to me...
//sarc


36 posted on 05/17/2006 6:32:09 AM PDT by Blzbba (Beauty is just a light switch away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
This is a major accomplishment. For those that have keep abreast of just how hard it has been for Iraq to come to any middle ground is indicative there are a lot of responsible leaders that did not give up.
It is so easy to bad mouth such and such, without being in the middle of what they have had to go through.
IMHO, I believe this is a major hurdle they have jumped over.
So many believed they would never arrive at this point in time. It appears now to be a reality.
37 posted on 05/17/2006 6:32:41 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Yes


40 posted on 05/17/2006 6:34:51 AM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Good news for Iraq and its people. Good work Mr. President.


54 posted on 05/17/2006 7:00:01 AM PDT by afnamvet (It is what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; EmilyGeiger

Hallelujah!!!


58 posted on 05/17/2006 7:11:20 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

This is great news, and a further testimony to several things that we should remember:

1. Worthwhile things often take time.

2. Even if the media chooses not to report positive developments, that doesn't stop them from happening.

3. History will be the judge of this Administration, not Wolf Blitzer and Nancy Pelosi.


59 posted on 05/17/2006 7:11:58 AM PDT by RobFromGa (In decline, the Driveby Media is thrashing about like dinosaurs caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
 

Good evening. Three days ago, in large numbers, Iraqis went to the polls to choose their own leaders -- a landmark day in the history of liberty. In the coming weeks, the ballots will be counted, a new government formed, and a people who suffered in tyranny for so long will become full members of the free world.

This election will not mean the end of violence. But it is the beginning of something new: constitutional democracy at the heart of the Middle East. And this vote -- 6,000 miles away, in a vital region of the world -- means that America has an ally of growing strength in the fight against terror.

President George W. Bush
President's Address to the Nation
The Oval Office
In Focus: Renewal in Iraq
December 18, 2005
9:01 P.M. EST

CHRIS MATTHEWS: 'BUSH BELONGS ON MOUNT RUSHMORE'
IF HE WINS 'GREATEST GAMBLE SINCE ROOSEVELT BACKED BRITAIN BEFORE WWII'

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
READ MORE

VIDEO CLIP
CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

by Mia T, 4.24.06




'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
THE ADDRESS
THE (oops!) TRUTH


"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak.  And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... 6

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' 

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow?  If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... 1

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright.  Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

 

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer




"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession 2 with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live



"You know... the job which we should have done 1... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards.  I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office.  In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week."

Bill Schneider
CNN
reporting on the Fulbright Prize
April 14, 2006

 

 

 
WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.

Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated
Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby

 

 

 

There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.

AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL

 


 

 
At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Mia T
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers


 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.


READ MORE


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



60 posted on 05/17/2006 7:12:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson