Posted on 05/23/2006 11:54:36 AM PDT by george76
Ward Churchill, the pugnacious professor of ethnic studies, insists that scholars who rebuked him for falsification, fabrication and plagiarism just don't understand his discipline.
Churchill is, of course, the University of Colorado professor whose misconduct was "deliberate and not a matter of an occasional careless error," a CU investigative panel has concluded.
The panel also condemned Churchill for "serious deviation" from accepted research practices.
In turn, Churchill and his righteous entourage insist that he's been targeted because of his "alternative historical perspective." Churchill complains that "individuals knowledgeable in my discipline" were excluded from the panel and that he had to spend time teaching them "rudimentary procedures employed in American Indian Studies."
"Had qualified individuals been included on the panel, this preemption of my ability to respond to substantive matters would not have occurred." Churchill writes.
This is a lot less complex than the professor and his dittoheads would have you believe. Sources cited by a scholar should confirm — not contradict — the scholar.
Factual assertions should be tethered to actual, verifiable facts. Prose should be the scholar's own, or credited to its rightful owner.
Churchill argues that such basic integrity is somehow irrelevant to the "rudimentary procedures employed in American Indian Studies."
All who value ethnic studies should be angered by Churchill's suggestion and indignant by the ignominy he's brought to the field.
You have to understand the true meaning of those "degrees"
You all know what B.S. means.
Well, M.S. means "More of the Same" and PhD means "Piled Higher and Deeper."
hat tip to Crispus Attucks Patriot
In turn, Churchill and his righteous entourage insist that he's been targeted because of his "alternative bizarro historical perspective."
I think that's the way Churchill's now-defunct university operated. Go to class, maybe. No term papers of finals. Just hang around.
Increase Mail's piece by 109%, reverse it, and the two overlap perfectly, down to the shape of the grass and the position of each rider's feathers, even the position of the horses' legs.Yet Churchill still maintains it is an original composition.(Yes, Ward, but why are all your Indians left-handed in the piece?)
No, Mr. Churchill. It's because you plagarized other historians "alternative historical" perspectives and passed them off as your own. Mr. Churchill is a theif, period.
Well, they know he's a plagarist now and they have no excuse to quote him ever again and should remove his quote from any subsequent editions of their books.
Of course, it's okay to do it here. After all, the racial proletariat demands it.
Ward's lawyer got Jay Bennish re-hired as an alleged High School Geography teacher.
Bennish was being paid by the taxpayers to teach high school geography, instead Bennish spent the class time on his personal rants.
It says alot when the teacher's union, the school board, and the fellow teachers approved of the re-hiring of Bennish.
So yes, to your question.
He has a point there. If any kind of logical, meaningful academic standard was used, "ethnic studies" wouldn't even exist.
Perhaps the validity of ethnic studies as an academic discipline should be questioned.
That's the standard algorithm for passing any PC class on campus. When I went to State U back in the mid- to late-neineties, I had to take the standard compliment of "electives", which was a euphamism for liberal arts classes that couldn't make it on their own merits. I would just regurgitate the teachers' PC spilkish back at them and collect my 'A' at the end of the day.
Nope. Changed my mind. He'd probably flunk me. :)
That is where we are in "education."
"the standard compliment of "electives", which was a euphamism for liberal arts classes that couldn't make it on their own merits.
I would just regurgitate the teachers' PC spilkish back at them and collect my 'A' at the end of the day."
bump
Then we both might get kicked out the university.
8-))
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
