Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call It What It Is. The president’s plan is an illegal-immigrant amnesty.
National Review Online ^ | 05/25/06 | Congressman J.D. Hayworth

Posted on 05/25/2006 6:49:31 AM PDT by Fury


Call It What It Is.
The president’s plan is an illegal-immigrant amnesty.

By Rep. J. D. Hayworth

Am-nes-ty: the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals.


Last week, I had the honor to travel to Arizona aboard Air Force One with President George W. Bush to see firsthand the situation along the Mexican border. President Bush is a good man, and when he is right I am among his strongest supporters in Congress. But on the issue of illegal immigration, he is profoundly wrong.

 

In Arizona, President Bush said: "First of all, in this debate . . . nobody should be given an automatic citizenship. That's called ‘amnesty.’”

 


But this is a strange definition of amnesty, considering that illegal aliens aren’t breaking the law by trying to become citizens—they are breaking the law by crossing the border illegally. If you let them stay here, if you pardon them for their crime of entering the country illegally, that's an amnesty.

 

The president is trying to redefine amnesty because he knows that admitting his plan is an amnesty would doom it. But in fact, Bush wants to add eventual citizenship for illegal immigrants in addition to letting them stay here. This makes his plan more than an amnesty—call it an amnesty plus.


The White House claims that the president’s plan is not an amnesty because illegals will face penalties and “benchmarks.” Here is what Tony Snow says awaits those who are allowed to stay under the president’s plan:


. . . you [the illegal alien] will pay fines, you will have a criminal penalty; you will also have to pay taxes; you will also have to keep your nose clean, you can't break the law; you will also have to stay continuously employed . . . you will have to pay your taxes, you will have to have a secure, tamper-proof identification.. And when all of that is done, you get to go to the back of the line, and you wait, what, 11 years or more for a chance to become a citizen, at the end of which you have to have a command of English, as well, to be able to become a citizen. Now, with all those benchmarks, it is hard to square that with the idea of amnesty.


What exactly on that list is onerous? Let’s go through it.


Illegal aliens will have to “pay taxes”: That’s no penalty; they’re supposed to pay taxes. In fact, according the Sen. Chuck Grassley, under Bush’s plan illegals would have the option to only have to pay three of their last five years in back taxes.


They have to “keep their nose clean”: Big deal. So does everybody else.


They have to get a tamper-proof ID card: Oh, the humanity!


They’ll have to stay employed: But isn’t that why they came here, to do jobs Americans won’t?


They’ll have to learn English: That’s a benefit to the illegal.


Most of these “benchmarks” would be required of any legal immigrant. They are in no way burdensome, yet Tony Snow makes them sound almost oppressive.


The only real punishment on the entire list is the fine. Know what it is? A measly $2,000 payable in two $1,000 installments. When you consider what illegals get for their two grand, it’s the deal of a lifetime.


The penalty for using a phony Social Security card is a fine of up to $250,000 and/or five years in jail. But Bush wants illegals to get pardoned for that serious crime and all their other immigration-related crimes. In the president’s plan, illegals get to have what they earned illegally counted toward Social Security benefits for themselves and their survivors. They get to send their children to American schools and bring their family into the country. They get access to public services, including the best health care in the world, and they get to enter and leave the country freely. In other words, they get to do everything a regular citizen can do except vote and serve on a jury.


To top it off, illegals are allowed not only join the citizenship queue, but also to legally live and work here while they wait. This privilege is worth thousands upon thousands of dollars for any individual illegal. And for the child of an illegal who is born in the United States and thus becomes an automatic citizen during this time, the privilege is almost priceless: John O’Sullivan writes that the going rate for a green card on the world market is $100,000.


If for some reason you still think Bush’s plan is tough on illegal immigrants, ask yourself what would happen if we set up a booth at the border charging $2,000 to come and live and work in the U.S. with the possibility of citizenship down the road. My guess is the line would stretch from Nogales to Buenos Aires and we’d erase our budget deficit overnight.


The idea that this plan would be onerous for illegals is insulting, especially to legal immigrants who have patiently gone through the laborious process of lawfully coming into this country.


The American people see through the White House spin. They know an amnesty when they see it. And the president’s plan is an amnesty.


—Rep. J. D. Hayworth is a Republican U.S. congressman from the 5th District of Arizona.


National Review Online - http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Nzk5OGU3YjZiNDZlZTUwMmYxMDI0ZTVhOTQ4MGZjZTQ=


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; flimflam; hayworth; mexico; shamnesty; snakeoil; wholecloth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: yobid

Just read this on www.theoutdoorwire.com today.

800 National Guard soldiers, including planners and leadership personnel, will head to the U.S-Mexico border next week.

Lt. Gen. Steven Blum said 200 soldiers are preparing to go to each of four border states: California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico "around June 1." The initial troops will be part of a longer-term force of project managers who will stay on the job over time to provide continuity in the new border program.

Under the plan, most of the troops would spend about 21 days, which includes their normal annual two-week training mission, working along the border. The Guard troops would be used for engineering, road and fence building, transportation, logistics and surveillance and reconnaissance.

Guardsmen will not be assigned "significant" law enforcement duties but will be armed for "personal protection."


61 posted on 05/25/2006 9:23:40 AM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Or as Deep Throat (1973) put it: "Follow the money".


62 posted on 05/25/2006 9:24:49 AM PDT by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

You got that right. He would be swept into office regardless of the Rep, Dims, and MSM. Our two party system would be relegated to history. And about time.


63 posted on 05/25/2006 9:37:00 AM PDT by newcthem (When are our congress-men going to start getting paid in Pesos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Darkwolf, it appears you object to some of the posters comments, but I cannot figure out whether Senator Darkwolf would vote Yea or Nay on S. 2611 today.

(I would vote Nay)

64 posted on 05/25/2006 9:37:45 AM PDT by Plutarch ((I would vote Nay))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
A wall.........ASAP.

How's that affect all those on this side already?

How's that stop the nearly half that enter the country legally and then just over-stay their visas?

There's miles of walls now and lots of tunnels and boats to simply come ashore on more thousands of miles of beaches.

65 posted on 05/25/2006 9:38:50 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

You take the practical aproach, just like Senor Jorge.....Since the country is invested with Criminals, no sense in trying to stop more from coming, best bet is just to grab your ankles and kiss America goodbye.


66 posted on 05/25/2006 9:44:26 AM PDT by newcthem (When are our congress-men going to start getting paid in Pesos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Me too.


67 posted on 05/25/2006 9:48:27 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (What would Thomas Pynchon do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MVV

I find it hard to believe that Tony Snow, of all people, accepts and supports the GOP's 2006 Amnesty Bill.


68 posted on 05/25/2006 9:48:36 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: democrats_nightmare

I think that's what puts me in a sarcastic vein when dealing with our dark forces. They have an increasing list of people they insult and condemn for not marching lock-step with them. Eventually, as we've seen in the Miers fiasco and with Dubai Ports, they end up condemning nearly the entire conservative movement.

The Bots will trash Ronald Reagan, and then cozy up to Carter, Clinton, Teddy, and Durbin. It's irrational.


69 posted on 05/25/2006 9:50:56 AM PDT by Luke21 (Democrats hate us, our heritage, and our religion. They think we belong in cages. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kabar

K,
So let me see if I've got what you're saying...

Someone only breaks a law if it is not enforced by
the gov't?

If so, then you should have no problem granting amnesty
to immigrants to.

ampu


70 posted on 05/25/2006 9:51:25 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (outside a good dog, a book is your best friend. inside a dog it's too dark to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
"If enacted, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA, S.2611) would be the most dramatic change in immigration law in 80 years, allowing an estimated 103 million persons to legally immigrate to the U.S. over the next 20 years—fully one-third of the current population of the United States."

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm

For those wondering.

As they say in the movie Force of Evil...

"I am sensible. I am calm. I'll give you my answer calmly and sensibly, my final answer. My final answer is finally no. The answer is no! Absolutely and finally no! Finally and positively no! No! No! No! N - O!"

71 posted on 05/25/2006 9:53:03 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (What would Thomas Pynchon do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

P.S. Heritage's number crunching on this is pretty far-out, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's a stupid bill.


72 posted on 05/25/2006 9:54:27 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (What would Thomas Pynchon do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
Someone only breaks a law if it is not enforced by the gov't? If so, then you should have no problem granting amnesty to immigrants to.

No, what I am saying that it is the responsibility of the USG to enforce its laws. If employers are breaking the laws, they should be held accountable by the USG. The same holds true for illegal immigrants who should not be rewarded by the granting of amnesty. Either the laws mean something or they do not.

73 posted on 05/25/2006 9:57:28 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

You might want to check my posting history which goes back way farther then yours.


74 posted on 05/25/2006 9:58:07 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

See my tag line


75 posted on 05/25/2006 9:58:26 AM PDT by tertiary01 (Obsessive Compulsive Thread Nannyism. I hope I don't catch it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Fury

JD is awesome....hope the idiotic Senate bill is DOA in the House!


76 posted on 05/25/2006 9:58:33 AM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

We could play this game to you must be a redneck.....


You must be a Thread Nanny if.....you can play the race card without being banned.


77 posted on 05/25/2006 10:03:21 AM PDT by tertiary01 (Obsessive Compulsive Thread Nannyism. I hope I don't catch it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: newcthem
You take the practical aproach, just like Senor Jorge

As opposed to the IMPRACTICAL approach which is not possible? Yes.

impractical adj 1: not practical; not workable or not given to practical matters; "refloating the ship proved impractical because of the expense"; "he is intelligent but too impractical for commercial work" [ant: practical] 2: not practical or realizable; speculative; "airy theories about socioeconomic improvement"; "visionary schemes for getting rich" [syn: airy, visionary, Laputan]

78 posted on 05/25/2006 11:12:11 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Am-nes-ty: the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals.

If someone is in the country today illegally and the day after tomorrow they are here legally then amnesty happened in between. It is not a matter of citizenship many years from now, most of the Hispanics probably don't want to be citizens and are only here for the jobs.

When these illegals start working and collecting Earned Income Credits we will effectively be subsidizing the employers that hire them.

79 posted on 05/31/2006 8:41:16 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

bttt


80 posted on 05/25/2007 10:40:34 AM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson