Posted on 05/25/2006 6:49:31 AM PDT by Fury
Just read this on www.theoutdoorwire.com today.
800 National Guard soldiers, including planners and leadership personnel, will head to the U.S-Mexico border next week.
Lt. Gen. Steven Blum said 200 soldiers are preparing to go to each of four border states: California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico "around June 1." The initial troops will be part of a longer-term force of project managers who will stay on the job over time to provide continuity in the new border program.
Under the plan, most of the troops would spend about 21 days, which includes their normal annual two-week training mission, working along the border. The Guard troops would be used for engineering, road and fence building, transportation, logistics and surveillance and reconnaissance.
Guardsmen will not be assigned "significant" law enforcement duties but will be armed for "personal protection."
Or as Deep Throat (1973) put it: "Follow the money".
You got that right. He would be swept into office regardless of the Rep, Dims, and MSM. Our two party system would be relegated to history. And about time.
(I would vote Nay)
How's that affect all those on this side already?
How's that stop the nearly half that enter the country legally and then just over-stay their visas?
There's miles of walls now and lots of tunnels and boats to simply come ashore on more thousands of miles of beaches.
You take the practical aproach, just like Senor Jorge.....Since the country is invested with Criminals, no sense in trying to stop more from coming, best bet is just to grab your ankles and kiss America goodbye.
Me too.
I find it hard to believe that Tony Snow, of all people, accepts and supports the GOP's 2006 Amnesty Bill.
I think that's what puts me in a sarcastic vein when dealing with our dark forces. They have an increasing list of people they insult and condemn for not marching lock-step with them. Eventually, as we've seen in the Miers fiasco and with Dubai Ports, they end up condemning nearly the entire conservative movement.
The Bots will trash Ronald Reagan, and then cozy up to Carter, Clinton, Teddy, and Durbin. It's irrational.
K,
So let me see if I've got what you're saying...
Someone only breaks a law if it is not enforced by
the gov't?
If so, then you should have no problem granting amnesty
to immigrants to.
ampu
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm
For those wondering.
As they say in the movie Force of Evil...
"I am sensible. I am calm. I'll give you my answer calmly and sensibly, my final answer. My final answer is finally no. The answer is no! Absolutely and finally no! Finally and positively no! No! No! No! N - O!"
P.S. Heritage's number crunching on this is pretty far-out, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's a stupid bill.
No, what I am saying that it is the responsibility of the USG to enforce its laws. If employers are breaking the laws, they should be held accountable by the USG. The same holds true for illegal immigrants who should not be rewarded by the granting of amnesty. Either the laws mean something or they do not.
You might want to check my posting history which goes back way farther then yours.
See my tag line
JD is awesome....hope the idiotic Senate bill is DOA in the House!
We could play this game to you must be a redneck.....
You must be a Thread Nanny if.....you can play the race card without being banned.
As opposed to the IMPRACTICAL approach which is not possible? Yes.
impractical adj 1: not practical; not workable or not given to practical matters; "refloating the ship proved impractical because of the expense"; "he is intelligent but too impractical for commercial work" [ant: practical] 2: not practical or realizable; speculative; "airy theories about socioeconomic improvement"; "visionary schemes for getting rich" [syn: airy, visionary, Laputan]
If someone is in the country today illegally and the day after tomorrow they are here legally then amnesty happened in between. It is not a matter of citizenship many years from now, most of the Hispanics probably don't want to be citizens and are only here for the jobs.
When these illegals start working and collecting Earned Income Credits we will effectively be subsidizing the employers that hire them.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.