Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Document: Highly Radioactive Atomic Neutron Device (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | June 18 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/18/2006 7:08:27 PM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150 next last
To: HangnJudge
I read your profile page and it is very impressive. Thank you for sharing your nuclear expertise with us.
51 posted on 06/18/2006 8:46:34 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Who? :)


52 posted on 06/18/2006 8:47:09 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for another great find and great translation.


53 posted on 06/18/2006 8:50:33 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
Doesn't a P-BE neutron generator require a proton beam source in the 20 mev + range to generate a neutron flux?

No. Polonium-210 emits alpha particles during its radioactive decay, which interact with the Beryllium to produce neutrons. The neutrons can be used for several different purposes, not just in nuclear weapons.

If this was a Po-Be source and it was over ten years old, it would be virtually useless. Polonium-210 has a half-life of 140 days, and after five half-lives, any source of radioactivity is basically inert (it doesn't make sense that this would be a "P-Be" source, since "P" is the designation for Phosphorus).

54 posted on 06/18/2006 8:51:34 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

You are welcome :)


55 posted on 06/18/2006 8:56:18 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

What do you think about the Tantalum coated Graphite?


56 posted on 06/18/2006 8:58:28 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas
You are right it should be Po-Be not P-Be. The document is slightly illegible, and hence P is indeed Po.
57 posted on 06/18/2006 9:01:14 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
And the national media does what???? Reveals the possibility of a CIA mole in al Qaeda of course.
58 posted on 06/18/2006 9:02:25 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

Why is the document saying that this device has "High Radioactive Activity"?


59 posted on 06/18/2006 9:03:50 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Did you catch Tony Snow with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday? Chris asked Tony if the reports Chris has been getting about WMD's in Iraq's records is becoming relevant, or not. Tony just slid right over it and didn't lend any credence to it in any way, shape or form.

Now obviously, If Tony DID know something, he may not have wanted to discuss it for some strategic reason, I suppose.

60 posted on 06/18/2006 9:12:42 PM PDT by SierraWasp (California is MEXIFORNIA , MANANA!!! The European settlers suffer from GANG-GREEN, TODAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Maybe they were mass producing AM antenna cores to get better reception during Rush Limbaugh.

/enemedia spin


61 posted on 06/18/2006 9:19:37 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bump!


62 posted on 06/18/2006 9:20:42 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Now obviously, If Tony DID know something, he may not have wanted to discuss it for some strategic reason, I suppose.

RandallFlagg: WMDs = Cheese ^

63 posted on 06/18/2006 9:21:46 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thank you once again!

prisoner6

64 posted on 06/18/2006 9:55:36 PM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great job jveritas, you are what the Stone-age press used to call an Investigative Reporter. You are a true patriot.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


65 posted on 06/18/2006 10:02:03 PM PDT by bray (Hey Zaqueeri, don't Mess with Texas!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I have a rhetorical, yet dead serious question. Why SHOULD the media disseminate all this potential WMD info we're reading here when the Administration didn't and doesn't lift a finger to tell the public about it themselves......and doesn't even seem to care. Hmmmm?

In this case under discussion, I don't buy the comments about divulging secrets. The papers written in Arabic were released by the government a good while ago and now are being translated and analyzed by our good freeper, JVeritas. For crying out loud what's going on here and why?

To me, the Administration is secretive even when it doesn't have to be. Can't it ever play hardball, EVER? Can't it ever point out triumphantly to public records (such as the papers Veritas is working on) which, properly explained, can put it in a good light for a change?

It makes me sick that the White House has a consistent record of fading away and almost forcing conservative TV pundits, radio talk show hosts and private citizens like Veritas and freepers to do the heavy lifting in both offense and defense.

I don't get it at all.

(......actually, I DO get it, and I don't like the answer one bit).

Leni

66 posted on 06/18/2006 10:12:12 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Mi casa es su casa. Mi pais es su pais. Mi dinero es su dinero. Mi..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone


To whom (what reporters) have you all written with pointers to where this information can be found?


67 posted on 06/18/2006 10:20:04 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
(......actually, I DO get it, and I don't like the answer one bit).

No cajones?

68 posted on 06/18/2006 10:22:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Tantalum coated graphite isn't only used in uranium processing. It is used in any process where you don't want to diffuse graphite into some process you are working (molten metal or certain corrosive gases). Obviously it applies to uranium processing, but that isn't the only thing.

Additionally, people are getting too upset about the neutron source. It really isn't a big deal. It really isn't practical to make a powerful neutron flux outside of a nuclear reactor. These 'Highly Radioactive' neutron sources are no doubt trivial by comparison, and by physics. If I recall correctly it takes something like a hundred thousand alpha decays to yield ~50 neutrons (for an Am-Be neutron source). Not a particularly efficient process. Even the tiniest nuclear reactor would blow away the largest Am-Be source (or any other alpha-Be neutron source) by many many orders of magnitude.


69 posted on 06/18/2006 10:25:08 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

"Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists have developed a tantalum carbide-graphite composite material ..."
____________________________________
If so, the Chinese also have it now...thanks to Presidential aspirant Richardson!


70 posted on 06/18/2006 10:42:46 PM PDT by cowdog77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RandyRep

"How do you distribute your translations?"

Not to worry ...


71 posted on 06/19/2006 2:09:21 AM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Minor correction - the second neutron source device should be "Pu-Be", ie plutonium/beryllium. The plutonium emits alpha particles and when these hit the beryllium you get a neutron of about 4 MeV. The "u" is just visible in the original.

These are commercially available devices, most commonly used to measure rock porosity. One of their common applications is in prospecting for oil fields. They have essentially zero military significance.

And I agree with a previous poster: the "tantalum coated graphite" is much more problematic.

72 posted on 06/19/2006 2:17:32 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good work !

Great article


73 posted on 06/19/2006 2:38:38 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091; jveritas
And the national media does what????looks the other way, they couldn't be less interested in this.

Indeed. But Jveritas keeps plugging along, showing just how pathetic most "journalists" really are.

74 posted on 06/19/2006 4:35:38 AM PDT by Coop (Jack Murtha - Semper Treasonous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

One of the most interesting threads yet j. Thanks to all FReepers who made knowlegable contributions to the thread.


75 posted on 06/19/2006 4:42:52 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (“Double or triple our troubles and we would still be better off than any people on earth.”---Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091

The mainstream media is too busy covering important issues like Brangelina's baby, Britney's pregnancy and Lindsay Lohan's partying to cover something as "trivial" as this. Gag.


76 posted on 06/19/2006 5:00:58 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6; bray; IrishMike; prairiebreeze; Coop; MinuteGal

Thank you very much for all your support.


77 posted on 06/19/2006 5:12:08 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; SE Mom

Great work, jveritas and an important find.

Yesterday, Chris Wallace asked Tony Snow if he knew about the new information on WMD's in Iraq; Tony said he didn't.

I thought that was pretty interesting. Something may be percolating about this issue.


78 posted on 06/19/2006 5:13:25 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: burzum

What are the other applications for the Tantalum Coated Graphite that Iraq was using it for? It definitely can be used for corrosive applications but as I said before and as you noticed from page 84 and 133 of the UN documents I posted this combination of Tantalum and Graphite was prohibited, period. The UN document was very clear on putting this under the “Prohibited Nuclear Activity” section. Also see my post # 22 regarding the hidden uranium enrichment activities and again you see both Tantalum and Graphite as part of these activities.


79 posted on 06/19/2006 5:19:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Thanks jveritas! Sorry for the late ping all.

Iraqi Document: Highly Radioactive Atomic Neutron Device (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

80 posted on 06/19/2006 5:26:11 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Chuck Norris was what Willis was talkin' about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You are correct. A neutron generator is essential to the design of smaller nuclear (fission) bombs.


81 posted on 06/19/2006 5:28:49 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; eyespysomething

Jveritas, I think you need to start writing a book on the subject of WMD and Saddam.

It can work as a factual expose and a complete condemnation of the world's MSM.


82 posted on 06/19/2006 5:29:43 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; BenLurkin

>>>"neutron generator"

What was that thing that a scientist had buried under his rose bed at his home again? (Iraq)


83 posted on 06/19/2006 5:32:27 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Found it. Have no idea if this is relevant in reference to the "neutron generator" or the Radioactive Atomic Neutron Device JV has translated.

I rather pull the stuff and let those that know decide.


http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-news/1225678/posts
Iraqi scientist buried nuke documents in garden

AN Iraqi scientist-turned-author says the most significant pieces of his country's dormant nuclear program were buried under a lotus tree in his backyard, untouched for more than a decade before the US-led invasion in 2003.

But their existence, Mahdi Obeidi writes in a new book, is evidence that the international community should remain vigilant as other countries try to replicate Iraq's successes before the 1991 Gulf war to develop components necessary for a nuclear weapon.

Yet Saddam kept his Iraq Atomic Energy Commission running, apparently without weapons programs, as late as 2003.


84 posted on 06/19/2006 5:42:19 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I believe that the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) had ended their mission much earlier than they should and made premature conclusion that Iraq had no WMD or programs related to WMD

This is quite true. At a minimum, this document that you translated shows that the ISG work was shoddy and incomplete.

85 posted on 06/19/2006 5:45:50 AM PDT by kidd (If God is your co-pilot, try switching seats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; ikez78

Ike, you may wish to be added to eyespysomething's ping list.


86 posted on 06/19/2006 5:46:17 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You are still doing awesome work. I hope one of those documents might pinpoint a location in the western desert.


87 posted on 06/19/2006 5:50:56 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

A better link.

The confusion comes from CNN reported a gas centrifuge and NBC just reported documents.

I wish I could find the thread where we had the actual pictures posted.

http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/935520/posts
Nuke component unearthed in Baghdad back yard


88 posted on 06/19/2006 5:55:39 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

http://www.iraqwatch.org/controlled/annex3text.htm

ANNEX 3
LIST OF ITEMS TO BE REPORTED TO IAEA


Items marked * and shaded are prohibited to Iraq under Resolution 687.
The notation (SC II) or (SC IV) indicates that items of the same type/category are also listed in one of the Annexes (2 or 4, respectively) of the UN Special Commission Plan.


(snip)

12. Tantalum (SC IV)

Tantalum sheets with a thickness of 2.5 mm or greater from which a circle of 200 mm diameter can be obtained.

(snip)

EXPLANATORY NOTE:
Many of the items listed in this section come into direct contact with uranium metal vapor or liquid or with process gas consisting of UF6 or a mixture of UF6 and other gases. All surfaces that come into contact with the uranium or UF6 are wholly made of, or protected by, corrosion-resistant materials. For the purposes of the section relating to laser-based enrichment items, the materials resistant to corrosion by vapor or liquid uranium metal or uranium alloys include yttria-coated graphite and tantalum; and the materials resistant to corrosion by UF6 include copper, stainless steel, aluminum, , aluminum alloys, nickel or alloys containing 60% or more nickel and UF6-resistant fully fluorinated hydrocarbon polymers.

(snip)

EXPLANATORY NOTE:
Components for these assemblies are made of, or protected by, materials resistant to the heat and corrosion of uranium metal vapor or liquid (such as yttria-coated graphite or tantalum) and may include pipes, valves, fittings, 'gutters', feed-throughs, heat exchangers and collector plates for magnetic, electrostatic (or other) separation methods.

(snip)

EXPLANATORY NOTE:
The crucibles and other parts of this system that come into contact with molten uranium or uranium alloys are made of, or protected by, materials of suitable corrosion and heat resistance. Suitable materials include tantalum, yttria-coated graphite, graphite coated with other rare earth oxides or mixtures thereof.

29.5. *Uranium metal 'product' and 'tails' collector assemblies

Specially designed or prepared product and 'tails' collector assemblies for uranium metal in solid form. These collector assemblies are made of, or protected by, materials resistant to the heat and corrosion of uranium metal vapor, such as yttria-coated graphite or tantalum.

(snip)


89 posted on 06/19/2006 6:05:07 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Joseph,
Great job. Nice translation.


90 posted on 06/19/2006 6:05:15 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.markeichenlaub.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

What's this "God" stuff? Doesn't that say "Allah" in the original?


91 posted on 06/19/2006 6:06:10 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

http://www.iraqwatch.org/suppliers/update.htm

Iraq's Bomb — an Update

By Diana Edensword and Gary Milhollin

New York Times
April 26, 1993, p. A17

Soon, possibly this week, the U.N. will report that its inspectors in Iraq have found yet another cache of strategic equipment for making nuclear weapons. Their chief inspector at the International Atomic Energy Agency, Maurizio Zifferero, should be embarrassed. He announced in September that President Saddam Hussein's atomic weapons program was "neutralized" and "at zero." He even said that Iraq had "decided at the higher political level to stop these activities."

Saddam Hussein never told the I.A.E.A. about the newly discovered equipment, as required by UN resolutions. And he continues to rain down threats and intimidation on the inspectors, indicating that he has more to hide. In March 1992, Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister, Tariq Aziz, told inspectors that Iraq had not relinquished the right to build weapons of mass destruction.

Before his army marched into Kuwait in August 1990, Saddam Hussein had a workable bomb design, many key components, a multi-billion dollar nuclear manufacturing base and a global supply network able to exploit lax Western export controls, especially those in Germany. His Western-trained scientists had produced small amounts of plutonium and enriched uranium: the fuels in the bombs that destroyed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. They even did clandestine research in laboratories the I.A.E.A. inspected regularly.

If Saddam Hussein had left Kuwait alone, he might have had his first bomb by now. He still has his scientists on the payroll and has protected the identities of many of his global suppliers. He has even started to get European and American inquiries on future oil sales: petro-dollars for a renewed bomb effort.

Here is a summary of nuclear-related equipment in Iraq today. It draws on export records and reports by inspection teams. The names of manufacturers, who may not have supplied their products directly to Iraq, are given where known. Iraq claimed the equipment was for civilian use The U.S. Government wants most of the material destroyed; the IAEA may let Iraq use it under the agency's monitoring. It was just such "monitoring," however, that failed to detect Iraq's bomb program in the first place.



Found but Not Destroyed or Removed

These items have been tagged for possible destruction, monitoring by the I.A.E.A. or unconditional release to Iraq.

• 580 tons of natural uranium (Brazil, Niger and Portugal).

• 1.7 tons of enriched uranium (Italy).

• 255 tons of HMX, a high explosive for detonating atomic bombs.

• 60 machines that shape metal into centrifuge parts, by Dorries, H&H Metalform, Kieserling & Albrecht, Leifeld and Magdeburg (Germany), Matrix Churchill (Britain) and Schaublin (Switzerland).

• Mass spectrometers to monitor bomb-fuel production, by Finnegan-MAT (US, Germany).

• Two electric frequency converters to power atomic bomb fuel production, by Acomel (Switzerland).

• More than 700 valves that can process atomic bomb fuel, by Balzers, VAT (Switzerland) and Nupro (US).

• Two coordinate-measuring machines to monitor centrifuge production, by DEA (Italy).

• 70 mixer-settler units to extract plutonium, some by Metallextraktion AB (Sweden).

• Machines for milling metal, by Maho, Schiess, SHW and Wotan (Germany), Innocenti (Italy) and Zayer (Spain).

• Two assembly presses and two balancing machines to make centrifuges.

• One resin-mixing and discharge machine to support electromagnetic uranium enrichment, by Millitorr (Britain).

• One jet-molding machine to make centrifuge motors, by Arburg (Germany).

• One 63-ton hydraulic press to shape explosive atomic bomb parts.

• One mainframe computer used to process nuclear atomic bomb codes, by NEC (Japan).

• Two oxidation furnaces for making centrifuge parts, by Degussa (Germany).

• One electron-beam welder to assemble centrifuges, by Sciaky (France).

• Tantalum metal sheets for making crucibles to cast atomic bomb cores.



Still Missing

These items are suspected or known to be in Iraq, but have not been found or accounted for:

• More than $1 million worth of computers, electronic testing machines, computer graphics equipment and frequency synthesizers licensed for shipping to atomic bomb builders, by Hewlett Packard (US).

• More than $7 million worth of computers, licensed for shipping to atomic bomb builders, by International Computer Systems (US).

• Nuclear reactor control panels, instruments and computers salvaged from a damaged reactor, by the consortium Cerbag (France).

• Computers and instruments capable of analyzing metals and powders for atomic bomb manufacture, licensed for shipping to an atomic bomb builder by Siemens (Germany, US).

• $43,000 worth of computers for a nuclear weapon testing site, licensed for shipping by EZ Logic Data (US).

• $30,000 worth of electronic and computing equipment lo measure neutrons and gamma rays, licensed for shipping by Canberra Industries and Canberra Elektronik (US, Germany).

• Five frequency converters capable of powering centrifuges, by Acomel (Switzerland).

• Parts that collected enriched uranium in electromagnetic enrichment machines.

• One jet-molding machine to make centrifuge motors, by Arburg (Germany).

• One powder press suitable for compacting nuclear fuels, by XYZ Options (US).

• $15 million worth of cylindrical presses, by Leifeld (Germany).

• $2.2 million worth of computers, licensed to be shipped to an atomic bomb builder by Unisys (US).

• $280,000 worth of computers and electronic and photographic equipment for nuclear weapons laboratories, licensed to be shipped by Perkin Elmer (US).

• $367,000 worth of computers licensed for shipping to an atomic bomb builder to run its machine tools, by Gerber Systems (US).

• Design plans for a $5.6 million plant to process uranium, by Natron (Brazil).

• More than 100 mixer-settler units to extract plutonium, by Metallextraktion AB (Sweden).

• Centrifuge cascade to enrich uranium.

• Underground reactor and heavy water to produce plutonium.

• Records of Iraq's foreign sources of expertise on uranium enrichment, foreign equipment suppliers and explosive tests of atomic bomb components.

• Records containing identities and current activities of Iraqi nuclear personnel, including those trained by H&H Metalform, Interatom, Leybold, Lurgi and ZSI (Germany), Balzers (Switzerland), Chemadex (Poland), CNEN (Brazil) and Matrix Churchill (Britain).

• Computer database showing status and extent of the entire nuclear weapon program.


92 posted on 06/19/2006 6:06:40 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Good Job jveritas.


93 posted on 06/19/2006 6:07:48 AM PDT by ikez78 (www.markeichenlaub.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

where's Hanz Blix?


94 posted on 06/19/2006 6:09:19 AM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal; All
Leni; ALL

The administration have decided not to open this subject again until “if” our troops physically find a large quantity of hidden WMD or “Precursors” for WMD.

The Iraq Survey Group (ISG) ended their mission very early and prematurely concluded that there was no WMD or program related to WMD in Iraq.

From the ISG report, they decided to search 20 of the most suspect ammunition depots where potential Chemical Weapons can be found, remind you that there are hundreds if not thousands of ammunition depots in Iraq. Now from those 20 ammunitions depots they only search 2 in details, just TWO!!!. Of course I do not even think that Saddam regime will put their WMD in ammunition depots because those are the most suspect sites and because it can be bombed but they have rather buried it in the Western Desert or somewhere else in Iraq. I do not think there was any attempt by ISG to look at potential burial sites. Moreover the total number of ammunition examined is less than 0.25% of Iraq ammunition that can carry WMD” ( i.e. 122 mm, 155 mm, etc… caliber shells).

I think the ISG have made a lot of conclusions from the Iraqis scientists they have interviewed and other officials who work for Iraq “Military Industrial Commission (MIC)” and Iraq Atomic Energy Commission. The ISG bought what these people told them that there were no WMD or program related to WMD. This is a big mistake on the part of the ISG. First these scientists and officials will not say that there were WMD or programs even if they know about it because they were afraid to be imprisoned by the US forces or even worse they were afraid to be killed by the Baathists even if Saddam is not anymore in power. The ISG and many American officials still do not understand how much fear and horror Saddam has installed in the Iraqi people that the vast majority of population are still afraid of the Baathists till now. Second I think that these scientists may have worked on portions of the WMD program without knowing what are the final results of their works, it is like a Manhattan style project (US first atomic bomb) where the vast majority of workers and scientists did not know what their individuals works were used for.

Very few people in Iraq knew about the WMD and WMD projects, Saddam is one of them. Most of Saddam cabinet did not know about it, including the vast majority of high detainees we have in custody. For political reason we cannot force Saddam or few other high level detainees to tell us anything significant about the WMD or its programs. Moreover there are two very important high level detainees that are still at large and they can very much know about the WMD. There are the Director of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) and the Director of the Special Security Organization (SSO). The SSO was in charge of handling, maintaining, and hiding all the WMD and delivering it to the troops in the battlefields. Qusay Saddam Hussein was the Chief of the SSO for a period of time but he was killed before we capture him and I was not sure that if had captured him we would have forced him to speak. Where on the other hand the Director of SSO and IIS can be forced to speak not necessarily us but by the current Iraqi government. Capturing these two guys is very important to know about the WMD.

95 posted on 06/19/2006 6:20:49 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Are you giving all of these a keyword (for searching) of PREWARDOCS? Is there some other keyword in addition to this?

Thanks so much.


96 posted on 06/19/2006 6:21:13 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikez78

Thanks Mark.


97 posted on 06/19/2006 6:22:08 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This may be a good idea my fellow freeper :)


98 posted on 06/19/2006 6:23:25 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

So far we are using PrewarDocs for these documents, but please feel free to add any keyword you want. For example this can be also put under WMD keyword.


99 posted on 06/19/2006 6:25:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the info. This will help me to look for these missing items when reading the documents.


100 posted on 06/19/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson