Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MICRO-WAVE or MACRO-WAVE (Sabato projects Republicans hold the House)
Center for Politics ^ | June 29, 2006 | David Wasserman and Larry J. Sabato

Posted on 06/29/2006 1:54:58 AM PDT by tlb

Just how perilously close are Republicans to losing their congressional majority in 2006? The way several independent observers and Democrats are talking and acting these days, you might guess the GOP's demise was all but a done deal.

But a little more than four months out from the election, the Crystal Ball is not yet ready to view the GOP majority as a flimsy house of cards, nor in our estimation should Murtha fast-forward to helping Pelosi hand out committee gavels to the ranking members of his caucus. The Republican margin in the House of Representatives may be more tenuous this year than it has been in any election cycle since its inception in 1994, but a larger wave than currently exists must build in order to completely erode the GOP's 15-seat edge, and by no means has the party in power already been swept out to sea.

At least for now, the race-by-race rather than national dynamic of competitive congressional races points to a "micro-wave" rather than a "macro-wave" for Democrats, and the current heat level places the Crystal Ball's best House estimate in the area of a 6-8 seat Democratic gain.

(Excerpt) Read more at centerforpolitics.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; election2006; electioncongress; midterms; sabato
Posted because several months ago I projected an 8 seat net gain for democrats. Now the experts begin to agree. It must be a relief for the House Leadership that they pass the Wasserman test.
1 posted on 06/29/2006 1:54:59 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

I respect Sabato a lot, so I'm quite happy to read this. In addition, my gut feeling is that the Democrats peaked a month ago, so if we're lucky they might only end up +4 or +5.


2 posted on 06/29/2006 2:04:03 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War (This tagline is false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Didn't FReeper Dales or somebody usually have a good analysis of races in the run ups to the past few major elections? IIRC he did a pretty good job on predictions. Thing is I think he cahnged his FReep name. I'll try to look back through the posts and see if I can find him and if so if he's doing it again.

prisoner6

3 posted on 06/29/2006 2:31:41 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Now I am worried. Sabato's motto should be, "Often wrong, but never in doubt."


4 posted on 06/29/2006 2:46:44 AM PDT by NavVet (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Texas might have helped...


5 posted on 06/29/2006 2:51:48 AM PDT by GOPJ ('Pinch' has been named al-Qaida's Employee of the Month for the 12th straight month-Phil Brennan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Looks headed down. Hopefully will be down significantly before November.

6 posted on 06/29/2006 3:41:46 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA; Berosus; dervish; Convert from ECUSA

The election will be a wash; my uneducated guess is 2 seats either way, so that the Pubbies may emerge with a larger majority than now, but definitely won't lose the majority. And any majority will be a victory for the administration.


7 posted on 06/29/2006 3:43:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb; All

I think there is a real possibility of the Democrats losing more seats, not gaining, losing !

The Dems are acting like fugitives from a loony bin: Howard Dean is the main example .

Other Dems are seen as Benedict Arnolds like, Murtha and Kerry . .

This November, Republicans who are seen as engaged with the public, will win re-election, and new candidates that act independent of the WH, will carry the torch of victory !


8 posted on 06/29/2006 3:52:46 AM PDT by marc costanzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
MICRO-WAVE or MACRO-WAVE (Sabato projects Republicans hold the House)

Which GOP, though? The Pubbies or the RINOs?

9 posted on 06/29/2006 3:55:33 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
This is crazy. I will say; we lose on 3 seat in the Northeast and Midwest but pick up seats in the Midwest, South and West for a net gain of 1. The democrat tactic are all wrong. They are in trouble and Carl knows it. We may lose some Governor but will will pick up a few as well. I expect low turnouts in many areas of the country because some Democrats and Independents are turned off all the negativity. Many of them support the war on Terror and can't stand what is going on in the press.
10 posted on 06/29/2006 4:20:16 AM PDT by man from mars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
This is crazy. I will say; we lose only 3 seat in the Northeast and Midwest but pick up seats in the Midwest, South and West for a net gain of 1. The democrat tactic are all wrong. They are in trouble and Carl knows it. We may lose some Governor but will will pick up a few as well. I expect low turnouts in many areas of the country because some Democrats and Independents are turned off all the negativity. Many of them support the war on Terror and can't stand what is going on in the press.
11 posted on 06/29/2006 4:21:02 AM PDT by man from mars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

Sabato's calls in the 2004 election were miserable. I remember at the time there were calls for him to hand in his crystal ball.


12 posted on 06/29/2006 5:16:01 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The Republicans will pick up 1 maybe 2 seats in GA.


13 posted on 06/29/2006 5:51:31 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Mike Barone is the only one I pay attention to.


14 posted on 06/29/2006 7:12:55 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Yes, the Democrats could nationalize the election. But a prerequisite is offering an alternative. Just the other day Schmuckie Chumer was saying the Dems can play antagonist and don't have to offer their own plan. Fine, but then you can't nationalize. "Vote for us and we'll.....do something but we can't decide what it is."
15 posted on 06/29/2006 7:55:59 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

RINO's will win in the NE as you realize. Perhaps Linc Chaffee will lose in RI. That will be a great loss for us. In the positive vein I mean!!! LOL


16 posted on 06/29/2006 9:51:50 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tlb

"Posted because several months ago I projected an 8 seat net gain for democrats. Now the experts begin to agree. It must be a relief for the House Leadership that they pass the Wasserman test."
Good for you pal but you're dead wrong. We pick up 3, 4 or 5 seats. On last Labor Day I posted an essay outlining 26 reasons why the rat will not only lose seats, but we will gain seats. I was wrong. I have now revised that list to 46 reasons and I'm thinking of adding today's USSC decision as number 47. Just this week alone I've welcomed 4 "experts" who now understand the rat is playing a losing hand. I now officially welcome you as well. By the way my list's number 28 names 6 rats that will lose their seats. I name names. You almost NEVER get names and specific seats from "experts", now do you?


17 posted on 06/29/2006 11:11:59 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hillary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

How is this election cycle any different than 2004 or 2002?

Stage 1: six to ten months out, there are all these bold predictions that the Democrats will take control of the House. Stage 2: two to six months out, the stories begin to moderate as more modest predictions of Democrat gains begin filtering out. Stage 3: close to the election, most prognosticators begin to predict no change or a slight Republican gain. Sabato's article is just the beginning of the second stage.

2006 will be no different. Unless there is some massive, unforeseen event, I'm predicting no change in control of the House with the margin remaining in double digits.


18 posted on 06/29/2006 11:47:00 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
I have now revised that list to 46 reasons...

Link please?

19 posted on 06/29/2006 2:59:03 PM PDT by kitchen (Over gunned? Hell, that's better than the alternative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson