Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas Libertarians stopped from holding event at nudist camp
Kansas City Star ^ | July 8, 2006 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/08/2006 3:29:00 PM PDT by Graybeard58

TOPEKA, Kan. - Kansas Libertarians were stopped from holding a fundraiser at a nudist camp in southwest Shawnee County, when sheriff's deputies blocked people from entering.

Shawnee County deputies said they were merely enforcing a court order when they stopped people from accessing Lake Edun on Friday. Last year, Shawnee County District Judge Terry Bullock issued a court order banning "commercial or recreational activities" on the property unless the owners get a permit for such events - something the county refuses to provide.

But Rob Hodgkinson, chairman of the Libertarian Party of Kansas, said a political party fundraiser isn't a commercial activity. He also said the deputies suppressed party members' constitutional right to hold such an event on private property.

Gates were to open at 4 p.m. Friday, said Webb Garlinghouse, who owns the property with his wife, Julie, but an employee called him that morning and said deputies were blocking the driveway. By mid-afternoon, six marked sheriff's cars were parked along the road outside the main entrance.

Hodgkinson said the Libertarian Party moved the three-day event to an alternative site.

Shawnee County Undersheriff Don Long said his office learned about the Libertarian gathering at Lake Edun from county counselor Rich Eckert. A sign at the property's entrance said the event was to run Friday through Sunday.

Patrick Wilbur, vice chairman for the Libertarian Party of Kansas, said admission was to be $75 per person and $90 per couple in advance and $80 per person and $100 per couple at the door. Topics for discussion included property rights and freedom of assembly.

Hodgkinson said the Libertarians needed to make money so they can compete and get people elected.

"We've got a chance to actually elect people, so am I frustrated? You bet!" he told the Topeka Capital-Journal.

Lake Edun, which promotes a clothing-free lifestyle and uses the term "naturist" rather than "nudist," has been at odds with county officials since 1996.

The county insisted Lake Edun (nude spelled backward) was being run as a commercial, recreational facility, even though the property was zoned agricultural. Garlinghouse insisted the camp was focusing on harvesting fish and planting native grasses and trees.

In January 2001, the county gave the Garlinghouses a two-year, conditional-use permit, with the stipulation that they could not try to renew it.

In September 2006, Bullock issued a restraining order banning the Garlinghouses from using the camp for recreation or commercial activities without a conditional-use permit. According to court records, the Garlinhouses' appeal is pending.

Webb Garlinghouse, a Libertarian, said the weekend gathering was to be the political party's first at Lake Edun. It was to include free camping, parking and recreational activities at the lake, plus musical and theatrical performances.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: anarchy; billofrights; blackrobedtyrants; constitutionlist; donutwatch; freesex; govwatch; jackbootedthugs; jbt; jbts; kansas; kansascity; libertarians; lper; lpers; naked; nudist; rfe; sex; topeka
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Graybeard58

OK - I question the motivation behind a nudist fundraiser for libertarians... but on the other hand - it IS private property. And from what I hear - it is located in an area that any such activity is not likely to disturb anyone else.


21 posted on 07/08/2006 4:31:40 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I thought Libertarians were all for hemp clothing?


22 posted on 07/08/2006 4:52:01 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Yeah, I've got an axe to grind...what else would you use on Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
20 more losertarians were scheduled to attend but they were to stoned too make it.
23 posted on 07/08/2006 4:55:31 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

So those wanting to contribute to Libertarians had to pull a checkbook out of their butts? LOL


24 posted on 07/08/2006 4:57:23 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The problem with holding a political fundraiser at a nudist camp is the lack of deep pockets, or any pockets.


25 posted on 07/08/2006 5:03:28 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
a fundraiser at a nudist camp

Nothing says "credibility and gravitas" like a fundraiser at a nudist colony ...

Lake Edun

Get it?

26 posted on 07/08/2006 5:30:16 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; labette; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; AntiGuv; LdSentinal; ...
Some things just speak for themselves...
27 posted on 07/08/2006 5:56:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Kansas Libertarians stopped from holding event at nudist camp

I thought the point was to raise money, not frighten people to death.

28 posted on 07/08/2006 6:01:10 PM PDT by RichInOC (The people who like to be naked all the time are usually the ones who should NEVER be naked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Kansas Libertarians were stopped from holding a fundraiser ...Webb Garlinghouse, who owns the property ... Topics for discussion included property rights ...

Kind of ironic I'd say.

29 posted on 07/08/2006 6:04:55 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
...it IS private property. And from what I hear - it is located in an area that any such activity is not likely to disturb anyone else.

There seems to be a message here. No freedom of speech without a permit, which the county had no intention of issuing in the first place. As for motivation behind the location... ask yourself if this would have made the news if it had been at a private restaurant. And if you answer "yes" think back to the last set of presidential candidate debates and try to remember the press talking about Badnarik getting arrested.
30 posted on 07/08/2006 6:08:04 PM PDT by Renderofveils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Darn. And all those clams and sausages are going to go uneaten.


31 posted on 07/08/2006 6:38:20 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Dang those librarians and their transparency-

Image Hosted by The Image Hosting

32 posted on 07/08/2006 6:42:06 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Political troglodyte with a partisan axe to grind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renderofveils
>>...it IS private property.
There seems to be a message here. No freedom of speech without a permit,

If it was a 'clothing required' event, I wonder if they still would have required a permit.

33 posted on 07/08/2006 6:46:03 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rzeznikj at stout; N3WBI3; MikefromOhio; FLAMING DEATH; Petronski

Ping-0


34 posted on 07/08/2006 6:47:47 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Political troglodyte with a partisan axe to grind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Why is it these things are always being held by the wrong people? Now... if it were the Kansas City Chiefs cheerleaders - then you'd have something!


35 posted on 07/08/2006 7:02:32 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I wonder how the judge would feel if it were his own political party.

Probably embarassed.

36 posted on 07/08/2006 7:06:03 PM PDT by Hacksaw (Deport illegals the same way they came here - one at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Renderofveils

You have a point there about publicity by having it at that location - and I would imagine that the foreknowledge that no permit would be granted was more reason to try to have it there -


37 posted on 07/08/2006 7:49:09 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

The real shame of this matter is that the Libertarian party feels the need (even if it IS warranted) to stoop to these kinds of stunts to attract even the periphery of a spotlight. It seems as though Decorum is following the footsteps of Chivalry.


38 posted on 07/08/2006 8:14:59 PM PDT by Renderofveils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rzeznikj at stout; N3WBI3; MikefromOhio; FLAMING DEATH; Petronski; antiRepublicrat; ...


Thread Jester Ping

A low-volume pinglist dedicated for all the thread jesters out there--you know who you are...8^)

FReepmail rzeznikj at stout or MikefromOhio to be added or removed from the list...

Thanks to ARealMothersSonForever for the heads up...8^)

39 posted on 07/08/2006 8:54:14 PM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (ASCII and ye shall receive... (Computers 3:14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

But how would the Libertarians carry their concealed weapons?


40 posted on 07/08/2006 8:54:37 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson