Skip to comments.What the British Jews think of Israel's war
Posted on 08/05/2006 9:54:58 PM PDT by familyop
There are doubts about tactics, but also resentment of media bias, says David Rowan
When two shipwrecked Jews were finally discovered on a tiny desert island their rescuers could not understand why they had spent their days building three synagogues. Isnt it obvious? one of the dishevelled survivors shrugged. An Orthodox one for me, a Reform one for him and a third that neither of us would ever set foot in.
When I began editing The Jewish Chronicle three months ago I was warned that this ever-so-slightly opinionated community of 300,000 or so people might drive me to empathise with Golda Meirs supposed complaint to Harry Truman: that if he thought he had problems, she had to run a country comprising a couple of million prime ministers. Maybe its the centuries of Talmudic debate, but oy, do the Jews love a good argument.
* Click here to find out more! So it is remarkable, amid all the juicy communal rows and furious falling-outs that normally tumble like manna onto our news pages, to see such a high degree of unity in support of Israels assault on Hezbollah. Even after Israels disastrous and widely condemned airstrike on the Lebanese village of Qana last Sunday barely a handful of our readers have been willing to voice open criticism of Ehud Olmert, the prime minister.
In private conversations with rabbis, activists, educators and ordinary secular and religious Jews from Gateshead to Golders Green, I heard all sorts of nuanced views last week, ranging from deep sadness at the suffering on both sides and reservations that Israels bombing campaigns might be undermining its longer-term security to anger at a perceived media bias in Hezbollahs favour.
But publicly, for all the doubts being expressed about the efficacy of Olmerts military strategy, there remains an extraordinary degree of agreement that he is absolutely morally justified in pursuing his lonely battle against the terror force next door. Because this conflict, it is widely understood, is a battle for Israels very survival against an enemy backed by Iran and Syria committed to eliminating the Jewish state.
For a mere newspaper editor to claim to speak for the diversity of British Jewry would be to invite an e-mail rocket assault as ferocious as anything raining onto Haifa and the Galilee. So what we have been doing, as the paper where the debate is taking place, is listening to readers views, asking questions and reflecting the breadth of opinion, from gung-ho heads of public companies to liberal Peace Now activists, even holding our breath to acknowledge ultra-religious anti-Zionist extremists such as Neturei Karta, whose rabbis march alongside Hezbollah flags and befriend Iranian Holocaust-deniers in their mutual quest to terminate the state of Israel.
Shortly before Qana we sent our reporters out on the streets across Britain to ask Jews, in roughly proportionate numbers to the communitys population distribution according to the census, whether they supported Israels actions in Lebanon. Of the 100 who responded 84 said Yes and just six said No. When asked, more specifically, whether they felt that Israel had overreacted in its response to Hezbollah, 70% felt that it had not, and only 20% felt that it had a marked contrast to surveys in the national press.
Last week, as media coverage conveyed an increasingly decontextualised picture of Israel as the aggressor in this conflict, and commentators felt daily less restrained from making shameful assertions about its genocide and Nazi-style collective punishment, we repeated the exercise by talking to a range of public Jewish figures in fields from academia to the arts.
This time, with many respondents expressing heartfelt concern about civilian deaths in both countries, a widespread sympathy for Israels need to respond determinedly was tempered by an increasingly outspoken minority view that in practice its military strategy had proved flawed.
Authors such as Dannie Abse and Lisa Appignanesi told us that Israels military response to Hezbollah had indeed been disproportionate; the playwright Arnold Wesker, while blaming Hezbollah and the Lebanese government for the conflict, worried that hollow Israeli apologies for Qana demonstrated a blind(ness) to the image they are allowing to be presented to the world.
Such increasingly open criticisms are still far from the dominant views of mainstream British Jews, for whom the psychological safe haven that is Israel must be protected at all costs from enemies committed to its extinction. More representative of our mailbag are the comments we reported from the writer Simon Sebag-Montefiore, who berated the few silly Jews in comfortable Hampstead villas who failed to see that Israel has every right to defend itself against Hezbollah, a powerful anti-western, Iran-backed terror state-within-a-state [that had] fired missiles from civilian areas precisely to provoke tragedy.
Maureen Lipman, too, was contemptuous of assimilated, sometimes self-despising Jews such as Gerald Kaufman and Harold Pinter who had been openly critical of Jerusalem. What exactly is a proportionate response to unprovoked attacks on a countrys borders and to the kidnapping of members of its armed forces? she asked. A letter? A sanction? A slapped wrist?
But if openly articulated dissent within this community is beginning to grow amid deep soul-searching about Olmerts dangerously overbullish military assessments, his forces poor intelligence gathering, and the wider consequences of such widespread destruction of Lebanese infrastructure and services not to mention the heart-stopping images of dead children beamed around the worlds television networks there are two aspects of this conflict that continue to unite most readers in agreement.
First, there is a widespread perception that much of the British media in particular the BBC is failing to report the conflict fairly. With more than 2,000 Hezbollah rockets pouring into Israel, with hundreds of thousands of Israeli civilians displaced, with loose talk on broadcast discussions of Israeli war crimes and rather less focus on Hezbollahs own breaches of international law there is an assumption among many of our readers of an instinctive anti-Israel bias.
Second, and far more significantly, there is a fear that events in Lebanon will make life more difficult for diaspora Jews wherever they stand on Lebanon. In last weeks paper we covered the desecration of Berlins Holocaust memorial, the vandalism of Jewish shops and synagogues from Sydney to Rome, and Mel Gibsons outburst about Jews being responsible for all the wars in the world. We also reported on growing evidence of anti-semitic attacks in Britain including the swastikas and phrase Kill all Jews daubed onto a Jewish doctors home in Hampstead Garden Suburb.
That, in essence, is why what unites British Jews matters more at a time like this than what divides us. Because, as a rabbi reminded me last week, when a Lebanese-born Hezbollah suicide bomber killed 85 Jews in Argentina 12 years ago, he didnt stop to inquire where they each stood on the war.
David Rowan is editor of The Jewish Chronicle
...another one against the myth. Hopefully, you also saw the article behind the following link.
American Jews stand by Israel
American Jews stand by Israel
British Jews support Israel ping.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
Follow the link, and scroll down to "Police clash with protesters in London." There were about 15,000 of them, according to Scotland Yard. The BBC said 20,000.
'Suicide bombers heading for Britain'
I wonder who shall conveniently authorize their visas for the visit?
Truman replied, "Are you the nurse? Where are the prunes?"
Zec 12:6 In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem.
If you'd like to be on or off this
Christian Supporters of Israel ping list,
please FR mail me ~
High Volume During IDF offensive operations!
There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had
spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass. (Joshua 21:45)
Letter To The President In Support Of Israel ~
'Final Solution,' Phase 2 ~
"The West has given more significance to the myth of the genocide of the Jews, even more significant than God, religion, and the prophets...."Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
The Holocaust Chronicle ~
" ... It's time we recognized the nature of the conflict. It's total war and we are all involved. Nobody on our side is exempted because of age, gender, or handicap. The Islamofacists have stolen childhood from the world."FReeper Retief
"Palestine is the wrong name for their State. It should be called Anarchy."FReeper sgtbono2002
"Then let's wait and see what the Arabs do after they take Gaza. There's nothing like Arab reality to break up a Jewish fantasy."FReeper Noachian
A student told his professor he was going to "Palestine" to "fight for freedom, peace and justice,"Orwellian leftist code words that mean "murder Jews."
The Nature Of Bruce ~
not just British Jews ... all non-Islamofascist Brits should be out there .. it's their country, their culture that is at risk. Hopefully sooner rather than later they wake up to the threat.