To: freedomdefender
The Marina should be privatized
2 posted on
08/09/2006 5:40:42 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
To: freedomdefender
The Colon Cowboys are determined to get at those young boys.
3 posted on
08/09/2006 5:42:14 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace begins in the womb.)
To: freedomdefender
The Scouts should demand reimbursement for the value of the rip-rap, plus interest.
4 posted on
08/09/2006 5:46:03 PM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(That is the trouble with essences. They are essentially troublesome.)
To: freedomdefender
The subversive left and its support for the queer agenda, will backslide into the tarpits of history. The left continues moving to the left, which will eventually put them over the cliff. I am optimistic that their rabid radicalism will wipe them out soon enough.
5 posted on
08/09/2006 5:46:21 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: freedomdefender
berth at its marina in exchange for rip-rap from a Scout-owned quarryCan some one please translate into land lubber? Rip-rap??
6 posted on
08/09/2006 5:46:35 PM PDT by
Hazcat
To: freedomdefender
Since then, as a condition for free occupancy, the city has required tax-exempt users of the marina to enter into a formal written pledge: Access to the facility cannot be predicated on a person's "race, color, religion, ethnicity, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, political affiliation, disability or medical condition." I wonder if they require people who drop their boat in for the day or rent berths to be non-discriminatory too.
11 posted on
08/09/2006 5:51:14 PM PDT by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that how you sell clothing.)
To: freedomdefender
Being an Eagle Scout myself, I'm glad to see the little Sodomite was expelled. My suggestions are; relocation of the Sea Scouts to the Florida Panhandle area, finding a benefactor to pay the fees at their present dock, building a new berth on private land.
I hope the Supremes back the Scouts, but obviously the good people of Berkeley and the California courts are deluded, have entirely too much time on their hands and far too much of the taxpayer's cash to spend. It's sort of reminescent of the TSA, but I digress.
14 posted on
08/09/2006 5:54:22 PM PDT by
308MBR
( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
To: freedomdefender
Not accepting perversion as normal and right is "invidious discrimination."I think the California Supreme Court are a bunch of perverts themselves !!!
16 posted on
08/09/2006 5:57:44 PM PDT by
Obie Wan
To: freedomdefender
The vessel serves as the equivalent of a BSA troop. Well, that is not quite right.
The vessel serves as their mode of transportation and the activities of the Scouts center around the vessel. The writer is confusing the word "ship" with "Vessel". In Sea Scouts the word "ship" has two meanings, one being a 'ship' in the traditional sense of the word, the other being synonymous with the word "troop". A group of Boy Scouts is termed a "Troop", a group of Sea Scouts is termed a "ship".
17 posted on
08/09/2006 5:59:44 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money -- M. Thatcher)
To: freedomdefender
no problem... we want the RipRap BACK or you pay market value. you RENIGED YOU LOSE.
35 posted on
08/09/2006 6:58:44 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: freedomdefender
So much for freedom of association, also a right protected by the Constitution.
36 posted on
08/09/2006 7:06:15 PM PDT by
PistolPaknMama
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
To: freedomdefender; RonF; AppauledAtAppeasementConservat; Looking for Diogenes; ...
37 posted on
08/09/2006 7:10:54 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: freedomdefender
Seventy years ago the city began giving the Sea Scouts a free berth at its marina in exchange for rip-rap from a Scout-owned quarry. Then its not a free berth, if they have to exchange rip rap to get it.
40 posted on
08/09/2006 7:26:39 PM PDT by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that how you sell clothing.)
To: freedomdefender
Seventy years ago the city began giving the Sea Scouts a free berth at its marina in exchange for rip-rap from a Scout-owned quarry. The Scouts argued unsuccessfully in California that the city had denied them their constitutional right to freedom of association.
Huh? Why are the Scouts arguing free association when the city is in breach of contract? When the city offered a perpetual berth in exchange for the rip rap, I'd bet that there was no provision for a change in the deal.
43 posted on
08/09/2006 11:01:44 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: freedomdefender
So if the court finds against us, do we get our stone back? Do we get paid for it?
48 posted on
08/10/2006 8:27:32 AM PDT by
RonF
To: freedomdefender
piper PAYERS still call tunes, I think they meant to say
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson