Skip to comments.
Group of gay hopefuls to challenge military's policy
KVOA, AP ^
Posted on 08/20/2006 6:51:32 AM PDT by Dane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
You go Meg, from the King of homosexual "culture".
1
posted on
08/20/2006 6:51:33 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: Dane
2
posted on
08/20/2006 6:55:05 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Dane
"in a nationwide campaign they have named Right to Serve."
It's been said a thousand times here but there is NO "right to serve". Military service is a priviledge, not a right. MANY people are turned away for MANY different reasons.
3
posted on
08/20/2006 6:55:15 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: Dane
"Group of gay hopefuls..."
What the heck is a "gay hopeful"?
ex: Davis Love III is a "Ryder Cup hopeful", meaning he hopes to make the team...
4
posted on
08/20/2006 7:01:48 AM PDT
by
dakine
To: Dane
Somebody tell these guys that the military makes you wear the same thing every day.
Booooooooooooorrrring!
5
posted on
08/20/2006 7:02:39 AM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Israeli defense strategy "Cogito Ergo Boom!")
To: BenLurkin
"gay hopefuls"??? Sounds like they hope to be gay. :-)
6
posted on
08/20/2006 7:07:21 AM PDT
by
PistolPaknMama
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
To: L98Fiero
Nowhere is it said you cannot serve your country if you are gay. What the laws do stipulate is you keep it to yourself. Homosexuality, at it's root, is inconsistent with military service. It is deviant behavior and is counter to good order and discipline. The UCMJ has numerous articles governing heterosexual conduct. Fraternization (134), rape and carnal knowledge (120), sodomy (125), pandering and prostitution (134), wrongful cohabitation (134) and adultery (134) to name just six. If heterosexuals are prohibited from committing sodomy, why should homosexuals be permitted otherwise? It's hypocrasy.
7
posted on
08/20/2006 7:07:48 AM PDT
by
stm
(Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence)
To: stm
8
posted on
08/20/2006 7:09:18 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: Dane
The only actual "hope" the protestors could have is the publicity, not any legal gain - unless Senator Kennedy and Justice Breyer and the ACLU have already gotten together, arranged for the protestors representation and lined up the staged court process by which their judicial oligarchs will issue some new dcrees.
Now matter what else is happening, in the world or in Washington D.C., if a Democrat controlled judiciary committee is not enough to get out the GOP vote, nothing is.
9
posted on
08/20/2006 7:12:37 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: stm
It's not about serving their country. They want to turn the military into a San Franciso bath house.
These same activists would scream bloody murder if they ever had to do what the military is designed for: defending this country.
10
posted on
08/20/2006 7:23:25 AM PDT
by
girlangler
((Fish fear me))
To: stm
It's not about serving their country. They want to turn the military into a San Franciso bath house.
These same activists would scream bloody murder if they ever had to do what the military is designed for: defending this country.
11
posted on
08/20/2006 7:24:24 AM PDT
by
girlangler
((Fish fear me))
To: Dane
But in more than 30 cities across the country, including Phoenix, homosexuals will be challenging the thirteen-year-old policy in a nationwide campaign they have named Right to Serve. There is no "right" to serve in the military, but leave it to the loony left to create one.
12
posted on
08/20/2006 7:27:29 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
To: stm
As a burley Master Chief explained it to me,
"I understand you are going to have to take it in the pooper now and then. You just can't like it."
To: DBeers; scripter
Just providing you with potential articles as I illicitly sneak onto FR!
To: Dane
Having spent many nights in a foxhole in the infantry during the early seventies,I could not imagine sharing one with a homosexual.As many an infantryman can testify,a lot of very personal things happen in them.I.E.,changing clothes,basic body maintenance,using 'the restroom'etc.A lot of which can not be done in the dark!
15
posted on
08/20/2006 9:05:27 AM PDT
by
xarmydog
To: Dane
Not a laughing matter, but "gay hopefuls" have me ROTFLMAO!
16
posted on
08/20/2006 9:08:28 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: Dane
17
posted on
08/20/2006 9:12:11 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: girlangler
If there was a draft, they'd be using their queerness to get out of military service. What freakin' hypocrites.
18
posted on
08/20/2006 9:53:32 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: pbrown
But they obviously want to join out of choice, so if there was a draft, don't you think they'd keep the fact that they were gay out of registration? That would be the smart thing to do....
19
posted on
08/20/2006 10:03:07 AM PDT
by
evanesco
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson