Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Earth Turned Bad: New Evidence Supports Terrestrial Cause Of End-Permian Mass Extinction
Science Daily ^ | December 8, 2004 | Christian Koeberl team leader

Posted on 09/02/2006 11:15:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Two hundred and fifty million years ago, ninety percent of marine species disappeared and life on land suffered greatly during the world's largest mass extinction. The cause of this great dying has baffled scientists for decades, and recent speculations invoke asteroid impacts as a kill mechanism. Yet a new study published in the December issue of Geology provides strong indications that the extinction cause did not come from the heavens but from Earth itself.

An international team of scientists led by Christian Koeberl from the University of Vienna studied rock samples taken from deep in the Carnic Alps of southern Austria and the western Dolomites in northeast Italy. Their findings promise to fuel what is already one of the hottest debates in earth science.

"Our geochemical analyses of these two famous end-Permian sections in Austria and Italy reveal no tangible evidence of extraterrestrial impact," said Koeberl. "This suggests the mass extinction must have been home-grown."

Layers of rocks contain a chemical testimony of environmental change though time. Asteroids and comets are chemically different from the Earth and when these objects arrive they leave a tell-tale chemical fingerprint in the rocks.

With the help of colleagues from the USA and UK, Koeberl confirmed the presence of the element iridium in the samples. Iridium is abundant in asteroids, comets, and other extraterrestrial material.

However, the amounts found were very small compared to those associated with the asteroid impact that many scientists believe killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. At the same time, the team found no traces of the extraterrestrial isotopes helium-3 and osmium-187, commonly associated with impact events.

What the team did find, however, was evidence of purely terrestrial processes at work. According to Koeberl, "The slight concentrations of iridium may have been deposited by sluggish oceans when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were high and seawater oxygen levels were low. The source of the carbon dioxide was probably volcanic activity."

Large areas of Earth's crust can be split by volcanic activity to create space in which oceans form. When it comes to cracking continents, however, breaking up is very hard to do. At the close of the Permian, one such failed attempt at ocean forming led to massive volcanic activity in the heart of present day Siberia. Emissions flooded the atmosphere leading to changes in climate and patterns of oceanic circulation.

"Our findings support the view that evidence for an extraterrestrial impact event during this time period is weak and inconsistent," said Koeberl. "At the same time, they suggest that widespread volcanic activity may have been the 'smoking gun,' quite literally, that wiped out much of life on Earth."

###

"Geochemistry of the end-Permian extinction event in Austria and Italy: No evidence for an extraterrestrial component," GEOLOGY, December 2004, v. 32, no. 12, p. 1053-1056.

*Christian Koeberl, Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

*Kenneth A. Farley, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

*Bernhard Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Dept. of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Wood Hole, MA, USA

*Mark A. Sephton, Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

GEOLOGY is a publication of the Geological Society of America.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; climatechange; nemesis; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2006 11:15:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yet a new study published in the December issue of Geology provides strong indications that the extinction cause did not come from the heavens but from Earth itself.

Are they sure it wasn`t George Bushs energy policies like Al Gore says?

2 posted on 09/02/2006 11:16:44 AM PDT by Screamname (A second plane has just hit the second tower, this is a coincidence. - Katie Couric, Sept 11th 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I thought the Siberian Traps had been tied in to the Permian extinction, but perhaps my recollection is faulty.


3 posted on 09/02/2006 11:17:30 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Also:

New evidence supports terrestrial cause of end-Permian mass extinction

*****************AN ABSTRACT**********************************

When Earth turned bad  December 2, 2004

New evidence supports terrestrial cause of end-Permian mass extinction

Dwain Eldred writes: Two hundred and fifty million years ago, ninety percent of marine species disappeared and life on land suffered greatly during the world's largest mass extinction. The cause of this great dying has baffled scientists for decades, and recent speculations invoke asteroid impacts as a kill mechanism. Yet a new study published in the December issue of Geology provides strong indications that the extinction cause did not come from the heavens but from Earth itself. 

An international team of scientists led by Christian Koeberl from the University of Vienna studied rock samples taken from deep in the Carnic Alps of southern Austria and the western Dolomites in northeast Italy. Their findings promise to fuel what is already one of the hottest debates in Earth science. 

"Our geochemical analyses of these two famous end-Permian sections in Austria and Italy reveal no tangible evidence of extraterrestrial impact," said Koeberl. "This suggests the mass extinction must have been home-grown." 

Asteroids and comets are chemically different from the Earth and when these objects arrive they leave a tell-tale chemical fingerprint in the rocks – for example, the famous iridium-rich layer at the K/T boundary that suggests strongly that extraterrestrial impact or impacts were involved in the late Cretaceous extinction.

With the help of colleagues from the USA and UK, Koeberl confirmed the presence of the element iridium in the samples. Iridium is abundant in asteroids, comets, and other extraterrestrial material. However, the amounts found were very small compared to those associated with the asteroid impact that many scientists believe killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. At the same time, the team found no traces of the extraterrestrial isotopes helium-3 and osmium-187, commonly associated with impact events. 

What the team did find, however, was evidence of purely terrestrial processes at work. According to Koeberl, "The slight concentrations of iridium may have been deposited by sluggish oceans when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were high and seawater oxygen levels were low. The source of the carbon dioxide was probably volcanic activity." 

Large areas of Earth's crust can be split by volcanic activity to create space in which oceans form. When it comes to cracking continents, however, in the words of the song breaking up is very hard to do. At the close of the Permian, one such failed attempt at ocean forming led to massive volcanic activity in the heart of present day Siberia. Emissions flooded the atmosphere leading to changes in climate and patterns of oceanic circulation. 

"Our findings support the view that evidence for an extraterrestrial impact event during this time period is weak and inconsistent" said Koeberl. "At the same time, they suggest that widespread volcanic activity may have been the 'smoking gun,' quite literally, that wiped out much of life on Earth."


4 posted on 09/02/2006 11:19:02 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So much for those ant-scientists who always say that theories of the origins of life (and TToE) are somehow monolithic.

I keep telling them that there are many debates within the community, but if you don't accept THEIR individual interpretation of a literal Bible, you are an atheistic heathen.


5 posted on 09/02/2006 11:19:46 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Your reply does not follow from the report. Actually, you sound quite ridiculous, to be blunt.


6 posted on 09/02/2006 11:21:55 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Reading material on that :

End Permian Volcanism

*********************************88AN EXTRACT ********************************

How could the Siberian Traps cause global mass destruction?

The immediate area would be affected by such things as lava and pyrocastic flows but how does this affect the other side of the world? The real power of the Siberian Traps was the climate altering potential by the emission of ash and gases. The Siberian Traps is recognised as having a large proportion of pyroclastic deposits relative to other flood basalts. This indicates an explosive nature with much ash and gases being pumped into the atmosphere. All of this ash and gas has two main effects that, even though they are opposite to each other, act on differing timescales.

Initially sulfur aerosols and volcanic ash envelop the earths atmosphere blocking out sunlight and sending surface temperatures plunging . Ash and sulphur aerosols can remain in the upper atmosphere for 100's to 1000's of years which would be enough to cause a significant glaciation. At the end of the Permian period the biggest ever drop in sea level in history occurred. Two scientists named Holser and Magaritz in 1987 proposed that such a marine regression could be caused by a large scale glaciation.

The second major effect is the emission of greenhouse gases such as CO2, methane and also water vapour. Green house gases warm the climate by allowing sunlight to pass through, heat reflected by the Earth itself cannot penetrate the atmosphere so is retained. Greenhouse gases stay in the atmosphere much longer so their climate changing effects can last for millions of years.

**********************************************************

Another minor effect is the destruction of the ozone layer caused by gas emissions. Chlorine and fluorine gases are erupted from almost all volcanic eruptions and these destroy the ozone layer. Without the ozone layer, harmful UV rays can kill organisms therefore contributing to a mass extinction.

7 posted on 09/02/2006 11:25:35 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

A climate changing event!


8 posted on 09/02/2006 11:32:07 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"...rock samples taken from deep in the Carnic Alps of southern Austria and the western Dolomites in northeast Italy..."


9 posted on 09/02/2006 11:37:54 AM PDT by AirForceBrat23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Ping


10 posted on 09/02/2006 11:38:01 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
From another source...

The buckyballs at the Permian-Triassic boundary contain trapped helium and argon with isotopic compositions like those in meteorites called carbonaceous chondrites, and very different from those on Earth. This led Becker and her colleagues to conclude that impact of a 9-kilometer asteroid deposited the buckyballs. An unanswered question is whether this impact caused the mass extinction by itself or did so in collaboration with the Siberian volcanism and possibly unrelated climate changes.
11 posted on 09/02/2006 11:40:51 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gen: 7:11

In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

12 posted on 09/02/2006 11:48:05 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; neverdem


13 posted on 09/02/2006 11:55:48 AM PDT by bitt ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Uh huh, yeah. But a big rainstorm probably would not kill off 96% of marine species as did the Permian extinction.


14 posted on 09/02/2006 12:03:05 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Did that verse say a rain storm? I missed that.


15 posted on 09/02/2006 12:06:10 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ...
Thanks, Ernest, for the update to this 2004 topic, and for the ping.

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·

16 posted on 09/02/2006 12:06:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

There is a recent report that tracking satellites as they pass over Antarctica reveals reduced gravity at one locality. This is evidence that below the icecap is a crater. The ice filling the crater masses less than bedrock would have.

This crater would have been formed by an impact much larger than the one that got the dinosaurs. THAT impact was antipodal to the Deccan traps of India. The shock of the impact went right through the earth and was focused on the other side, blowing out a large region of the crust in India. Hence, the lava flows there.

Now, Siberia is antipodal to Antarctica, or near enough when we consider that continents drift. So wouldn't it make sense that the Siberian traps were the result of a similar shock wave from that larger impact that formed the Antarctic hidden crater?


17 posted on 09/02/2006 12:13:35 PM PDT by lostlakehiker (Not So Fast There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Did that verse say a rain storm?

Um, yeah, that's exactly what it says.

I missed that.

I'm so shocked. Stuned even.

18 posted on 09/02/2006 12:40:38 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lostlakehiker

Well we have a whole industry of "scientists" getting funding for Computer climate models.....surely someone would fund a computer simulation of an asteroid impact on our blue marble.....


19 posted on 09/02/2006 1:02:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bookmard.


20 posted on 09/02/2006 1:10:36 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson