Call Disney at 1-818-560-1000 or 1-818-460-7477.
Call ABC at 1-212-456-7777 or 1-818-560-1000.
People won't care about the threat unless it comes true. We have ALL been waiting for the third season of Lost. /s
APf
The dems did the same thing to Sinclair Media during the Kerry campaign.
It worked then, why not try it again?
Like I said a week ago, if it's being shown on ABC the final product will be either modified to conform to the wishes of the democrats or won't be shown at all.
I think that the best thing that could happen with "The Path to 9/11" is for it to be either shown on cable with not changes or for another network (are you listening FOX?) to buy it from ABC and show the entire film with no changes.
I can imagine the outcry by conservatives if something like this were done to a Republican President (so many examples to choose from here...), but I never would expect the Republicans in Congress to unleash such a threat. They never did, as far as I can remember, over many such falacious TV shows and movies.
All I can say is that, though I still believe ALL politics to be a dirty game between two teams of whores, there is CLEARLY one that is worse than the other. CLEARLY. I don't know about you all, but the "broken glass Republican" in me has risen again!
Regardless of Who does/says What,
that movie in its uncut version is
headed for a private sale and will
resurface later. The Dems have merely
escalated the going price. Besides,
with all the detailed hoopla about
what scenes are being cut to salve
the egos of Clintonista aides/cronies,
what voting citizen, even a Democrat,
is going to see the edited version and
not be able to phantasize the original
statements?
What surprises me is the fact NO ONE
as yet has cited Hillary's run for
the Oval Office as the real reason
behind the MAKING of this movie as
well as the OBJECTIONS to it! Maybe
that's election food fare for later
in 2007?
This will be a monumental event. I don't think it's exagerration to say this could swing the November election, because, let's face it, most voters are not news junkies like we are, and it's been shown that most get their 'news" from Leno and John Stewart--infotainment, not hard news sources. People who want to get up to speed on 9/11 facts but don't want to read books will watch this and feel they know a lot about what led to 9/11.
That's why this is so very important. If Bush comes off looking derelect in his duty, we could be in some trouble, but it's possible the Bush-hatred has reached a saturation point. The Dems, and Clinton, have been riding a wave of ignorance and MSM covering-up of the Clinton Administration's total lack of effort to prevent Al Qaeda's rise. And this could shift things just enough--a few thousand votes here and there--to spell catastrophe for the Dems.
It could do nothing, or it could affect the election. But there is more danger here for the Dems than for the Republicans.
no different than the outcry from repulicans over "The Reagans" a few years back
This is actually great news in the long run....the Dems unwillingness/inability to constructively participate in the greatest debate of the new century effectively ends their political leadership...probably permanently...probably even as a functional party. Watching the Dems atrophy under Clinton leadership through the '90's, I nevere figured he'd completely kill it off...but he/she finally have. The treasonous and cowardly among us are labeled and identified.
This convulsion is happening because the rats just launched their theme to get congress back this year and Hill in 2008. That theme depends of americans foggy forgetfulness of how inadequate the rats were in defending america. They almost got the public to believe that pubs are making them less safe. Almost. And noone in Hill's army wants monica or Bill Vs. OBL brought up.
The Constitution guarantees that only flattering things can be said about Democrat/liberals.
Otherwise, it might hurt their feelings, and they could suffer from irreparable low self-esteem.
