Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Osama Bin Laden About to Attack the U.S., Says Terrorism Expert [suitcase nukes]
US Newswire ^ | 9/22/2006 | Dr. Hugh Cort

Posted on 09/24/2006 3:54:25 AM PDT by Hadean

To: National Desk

Contact: Dr. Hugh Cort, 205-213-5621 or 205-313-1786

WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following is a statement by Republican presidential candidate Dr. Hugh Cort:

I work with Dr. Paul Williams, the source for the September 7th World Net Daily article "Al-Qaeda Warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S.; Afghan terror commander hints at big attack on NY, Washington." He is in touch with Hamid Mir; the Fox News Middle East expert who has interviewed bin Laden three times. Hamid Mir did the interview with Abu Dawood, the top Al Qaeda man in Afghanistan, who said all the Muslims need to leave America, especially New York and Washington, because Osama is soon going to attack with his "American Hiroshima" plan where he blows up 7 to 10 American cities with suitcase nukes.

Abu Dawood also told Hamid Mir that bin Laden will come out with a new audiotape in the next 10 days or sooner. Dr. Williams can provide media with the transcript of this interview. (NOTE: Contact Dr. Cort at 205-213-5621 between 2 p.m. and midnight Eastern Time, or leave a message at 205-313-1786 for more information).

Dr. Williams and I have located Adnan Shukrijumah, who the FBI calls "the next Mohammed Atta", who is the leader of bin Laden's "American Hiroshima" attacks, in Canada. We met with Canadian intelligence for five hours. They were very helpful. However the FBI has not been helpful. Google the name Ciro Vitolo. We have much more info that is not on the internet. We have also discovered what we believe could be the nerve center for bin Laden's "American Hiroshima" attacks. Hamid Mir, who has never been wrong to our knowledge, says bin Laden has already smuggled suitcase nukes through the Mexican border into the U.S. and is soon going to blow up 7 to 10 American cities.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, bin Laden's number two man, said in his latest audiotape, essentially "We have warned you repeatedly, we have offered you a truce, we have asked you to convert to Islam, so now we have satisfied all the requirements (of Muslim law or "Honor Code" where you must warn your enemy, and offer him one last chance for a truce and to convert, before you strike him) and now we are justified in attacking you. Your government has hidden from you the full extent of the devastation that is coming. The days are pregnant with events that are about to be born."

In his audiotape of Jan. 19, bin Laden offered America a truce, then said "The only reason we have not attacked you yet is not because of your security precautions. It is simply because we are not quite through with the preparations. The minute the preparations are through, you will feel the attacks in your own homes."

Christianne Amanpour in the CNN special on bin Laden that aired a few weeks ago, "In the Footsteps of Bin Laden" made the point that before 9/11 bin Laden got a fatwa saying it was okay to kill civilians. Then he did 9/11. Now, she pointed out, he has gotten a fatwa, or religious order, saying it is OK to kill 10 million Americans with nuclear weapons. Guess what is going to happen next?

These attacks, which Khalid Sheik Mohammed said will be "a nuclear hell storm on America", are coming soon, perhaps as early as this Saturday, when the Muslim holy month of Ramadan starts.

So what can we do at this late date?

The FBI needs to search every mosque in our major cities, but in surprise raids, because, apparently, according to an internet posting by the English Muslim convert Rakan Ben Williams, the bombers have a "failsafe plan" where if one of them gets caught the others are to immediately detonate their nukes.

And we must quickly catch Shukrijumah and his fellow terrorists in Canada before they blow up 7 to 10 American cities (just contact Dr. Paul Williams and myself and we will lead you to them). It is our only chance.

Also, everyone needs to immediately go to the website http://www.ki4u.com where they can order potassium iodide (KI) pills to avoid thyroid cancer in the event of a nuclear attack, and on that website they can read the ten-page article "How to Survive a Nuclear Attack" -- stay inside your house for three days, after which the radiation decreases to one hundredth of its initial strength, and then it is safe to go outside for short trips, and after 2 weeks you can go out all the time. But if you go outside in the first three days, even just for ten minutes, you will receive a fatal dose of radiation and slowly bleed to death internally over 2-3 weeks. Remember, many more people died from radiation poisoning after Hiroshima than died in the initial blast.

Please help me and Dr. Paul Williams stop these horrible attacks. Please get us some press coverage and some help from our Congressmen and Senators and FBI and CIA and NSA before it's too late.

God bless you, and God bless America!

P.S. Watch for Osama's new audiotape, coming out in a few days.

---

Visit http://www.stopdoomsday.com and http://www.cortforpresident.com for futher information.

http://www.usnewswire.com/

-0-

/© 2006 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 4idiots; americanhiroshima; gwot; hughcort; idiot; osamabinladen; terror; tinfoilnutcase; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last
To: Hadean
Interesting that the jihadists have allegedly advised muslims to leave the US. "If" the islamoloonies were to nuke the US, there wouldn't be a muslim left alive in the US to assist in any so-called "conversions".
101 posted on 09/24/2006 7:27:07 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generalhammond

well, this could take care of our illegal alien problem. I guess.


102 posted on 09/24/2006 7:28:47 AM PDT by television is just wrong (our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

They wouldnt warn Muslims to leave because they were attacking again . They don't care if they kill their own , it's part of their obligation to die for the cause.


103 posted on 09/24/2006 7:29:04 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

You said -- "Right, Ollie North said after 9/11 that was their biggest hit if they had anything bigger they would have used it instead. who really believes a jihadist can sit on a suitcase and not use it."

Well, the facts indicate something different. It seems that al Qaeda has about a five-year planning cycle. So, they do "plan". So, as far as what happened on 9/11, keep in mind two things. There was a 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. And secondly, it's already been shown that al Qaeda was planning it for years.

And then, it's easy to logically follow-up on that statement above. One can easily say that al Qaeda didn't have the means back then, and they could acquire the means (at any time) now (or may have just acquired the means).

So, Ollie North doesn't quite help for today's situation.

Regards,
Star Traveler


104 posted on 09/24/2006 7:30:13 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
If they had them they would have used them already.

I must strongly disagree. You're still thinking as an American thinks, and also overlooking the difficulty of ensuring the delivery of the materials and of choosing exactly the right date to assist whoever wants to be the "mahdi" in attaining that prophetic goal.

I have considered the jihadis for a long time. I am convinced that IF they have WMD, they quite possibly may sit on them for a long time, waiting for THEIR opportune date. Not what we would think of.

Do they actually have nukes? Who knows. They have the money and the easily-bought expertise. I have no idea. However, it is wrong to conclude that if they had them, they would have used them already. If they have them, they will use them when they think they can best catapult themselves to power in what they think is the coming global caliphate.

For the record, no matter what happens in the US, I think the global caliphate will be defeated, and Islam sent back several centuries with its tail between its legs.

105 posted on 09/24/2006 7:31:37 AM PDT by Sender (* Pre-cooked weight. Your mullah may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All

I find it suicidal on the part of America to NOT deport all Muslims knowing what we know about the enemy within. We WILL be attacked again and it will be homwgrown. Our government is totally failing their FIRST priority , to protect us.


106 posted on 09/24/2006 7:31:59 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

These articles just kill me. If we are nuked, preventing thyroid cancer in 20 years is the least of our worries. I don't understand holding potassium iodide in front of you like some kind of garlic necklace if we are nuked.

It won't protect you from the million degree temps, the blast wave, or acute or chronic radiation sickness. But, you won't get thyroid cancer in 20 years. What a relief!


107 posted on 09/24/2006 7:32:04 AM PDT by Mom MD (The scorn of fools is music to the ears of the wise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

You said -- Interesting that the jihadists have allegedly advised muslims to leave the US. "If" the islamoloonies were to nuke the US, there wouldn't be a muslim left alive in the US to assist in any so-called "conversions".

Yes, it's very interesting. It's interesting in that it must indicate an attack so horrendous that they anticipate a huge *backlash* against those Muslims who are living here.

Or else (or, "in addition") the attack is also *so pervasive* that it affects large groups of Muslims, too.

Those are worth considering.

Regards,
Star Traveler


108 posted on 09/24/2006 7:33:01 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
Last week, a libloon I "work" with claimed that if a nuke were to be detonated in-country, it'd be a Karl Rove operation aimed at discrediting the demoncrats for opposing Bush and the rightwing's attempts at broadening the war on terror.

Insanity isn't just for muslims.

109 posted on 09/24/2006 7:36:12 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

You said -- "I thought he was dead. That is what the French are saying."

Well, President Bush doesn't think so. That's what he's told the American public, in that the "hunt is on" for Osama bin Ladin.

And, in addition, the FBI still has Osama on their "ten most wanted" list.

BUT, thinking about it, from *another angle* -- World War II did not stop when Franklin Roosevelt died -- did it?

Regards,
Star Traveler


110 posted on 09/24/2006 7:39:20 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

If the loons were to attack, there'd be a new glass factory in Mecca and instead of Bush having to deal with demoncrats in Congress, the demoncrats would have to deal with the new military district commanders charging them with treason in opposing national defense.


111 posted on 09/24/2006 7:39:25 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

really? Just who exactly do you hit? I'd want a kick as$ response as well...But hmmmm? Is this a movie? Do you really think that anyone will kill all Muslims or make Mecca a parking lot...ok lets say $100 a gallon gas for the next 10 years. Think in reality...not just what we would like to happen. "Dude, grab me a beer...or yeah! those towelheads hit us we will make a freakin parking lot out of the middle east!!" Really?

Not trying to nail you-but a lot of people say that but I don't know? Will will nuke some places. I don't know abot Whole countries or exteme holy sites. Well, Hell, maybe we would??


112 posted on 09/24/2006 7:45:17 AM PDT by repubzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

You said -- "If the loons were to attack, there'd be a new glass factory in Mecca and instead of Bush having to deal with demoncrats in Congress, the demoncrats would have to deal with the new military district commanders charging them with treason in opposing national defense."

Well, you see..., people would have said that about a major attack like 9/11.

I mean, back then considering knocking down about ten buildings in New York City (the financial hub of the U.S.), attacking the Pentagon (the military hub of the United States), and making an attempt to attack the Congress (the legislative hub of the United States), all in all, thousands killed -- would have precipitated "turning Mecca into a sea of glass..."

BUT, it didn't!

And it won't this time either. The Saudis will still *remain* "our friends" (business as usual).

The problem will still be a "war on terror" (and not a war on Islam). It will still be "the radicals" -- and not the Muslim religion.

Do you think anything will change?

Regards,
Star Traveler


113 posted on 09/24/2006 7:45:50 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

I know man . Here in NY City most people believe 9/11 was a Bush plot to make war and thereby make oil money for his friends ( I really can't get the connecton but ..) I think most of the world believes that and at least half the country has been brainwashed. The Muzzies are REALREAL slick . They will wait until the insanity really sets in completly . Then, they can attack us and have us blame ourselves for it. PERFECT PLAN. I have little hope for the US to be honest.


114 posted on 09/24/2006 7:46:35 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

"Suitcase Nuke" is an interesting term. I was briefed once about 25 years ago on our suitcase nuke. It would fit into a suitcase but weighed about 95 pounds and was the state of the art at the time. It took a giant effort to produce and as I recall would yield about 30KT on max yield but could be dialed down to about 10KT. Now understanding that the infrastructure required to develop and support such a device was mind boggling I do not believe the Fascists have the capability of developing such a weapon. It is possible that the Paki's have helped but doubtful since we would know within and hour where the core material came from. It is much more likely that the scumbags have gotten their hands on a few Soviet warheads mostly of missile variety. Bad news is that if they do manage to get one to light off it could be a very large event. If it is nuclear then they could do some serious damage. If it is a thermonuclear device then in all likely hood it will be a dud due to lack of maintenance.. Bad news is a dud will leave all of the radioactivity in a very dirty state and concentrated in a small area. A Cessna 182 could easily carry such a device.


115 posted on 09/24/2006 7:49:45 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
I think that, after the coming attack, you are correct in that the government will continue to say that this is a war on "terror" and only the radical minority who have "hijacked" a great and peaceful religion.

However the people will believe otherwise and will act accordingly. We won't CAIR who's hijacked and who's not.

116 posted on 09/24/2006 7:50:34 AM PDT by Sender (* Pre-cooked weight. Your mullah may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: repubzilla
Being careful about what one says online, yes, I do believe that should jihadists nuke the US, resident muslims would be in danger.

Who would participate? Who can be sure....but, knowing the capacities of your fellow man is near impossible when events force a new paradigm upon your average Joe.

Are muslims the only ones who are capable of acting out irrational rage on non-muslims by random shootings, crashing cars into crowds or wearing homicide belts?

Answer that question and you'll have your solution.

117 posted on 09/24/2006 7:51:12 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

I've wondered if any attacks on the US would serve to trigger an all-out war on Muslim nations and that is what they are after. An excuse to gather support for all of them to ally themselves against the rest of us. Any big attack like this article is talking about would certainly produce a big response from us. At least, I hope it would.


118 posted on 09/24/2006 7:53:57 AM PDT by Mrs. P (I am most seriously displeased. - Lady Catherine de Bourg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MRadtke

There was about 10 years of direct warnings. Not to mention the last 1,000 years.


119 posted on 09/24/2006 7:55:50 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Knowing what we know now and knowing the difference between what was essentially three huge Molotov Cocktails rammed into buildings and mushroom clouds with irradiated surrounding countrysides, yeah...there'd be a different reaction, this time.

9/11 was largely restricted to a couple large city blocks of real estate. Take out scores of city blocks and multiply the death toll by a factor of 100+ and you'll get a different retaliatory response.

It's called upping the ante.

120 posted on 09/24/2006 7:56:06 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson