Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress bans internet gambling
Reuters/Washington Post ^ | 9/30/06 | Peter Kaplan

Posted on 09/30/2006 9:43:50 AM PDT by Alterboy1964

Congress approves Internet gambling ban bill

By Peter Kaplan Reuters Saturday, September 30, 2006; 12:52 AM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most forms of Internet gambling would be banned under a bill that received final U.S. congressional approval early Saturday.

The House of Representatives and Senate approved the measure and sent it to President George W. Bush to sign into law.

The bill, a compromise between earlier versions passed by the two chambers, would make it illegal for banks and credit card companies to make payments to online gambling sites.

Democrats had accused Republicans of pushing the bill to placate its conservative base, particularly the religious right, before the November 7 congressional elections.

"It's been over 10 years in the making. The enforcement provisions provided by this bill will go a long way to stop these illegal online operations," said Sen. Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican and a chief sponsor of the measure.

Negotiators from the Republican-led House and Senate reached a deal on the legislation Friday and attached it to unrelated legislation to bolster port security, which the Congress approved.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican and potential 2008 presidential candidate, recently appeared at a hearing in Iowa -- the state that holds the first presidential nominating contest for the 2008 election -- to listen to concerns about Internet gambling.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abuse; comingforyou; control; gambling; governmentcontrol; helpless; internet; lookout; responsibility; scary; trollbait; waste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-270 next last
To: Alterboy1964

IBTZ????


61 posted on 09/30/2006 10:12:26 AM PDT by Gvl_M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

So that means the FCC will stop the commercials?


62 posted on 09/30/2006 10:12:48 AM PDT by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Exactly, what's stopping gamblers from going to brick-and-mortar casinos. There are casinos everywhere now.

Because you can't go to a brick and mortar casino and play for a couple of hours on $2.

Anyone that says they can is a liar.

63 posted on 09/30/2006 10:14:43 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
I remember reading about one of these online operations offering to set up shop in one state and be taxed. Nothing ever came of it though. Guess they had to protect the state and indian operations.
64 posted on 09/30/2006 10:14:52 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964
For me as majority leader, the bottom line is simple:
Congress can decree that Internet gambling is illegal. -- To hell with 10th Amendment limitations on "powers not delegated".

"Good riddance"

Your neighborhood bookie thanks you..

65 posted on 09/30/2006 10:14:57 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

You're right. What am I missing here? Tunica is sometimes listed as Tenn. and sometimes as Miss. Memphis needs Tunica gambling?


66 posted on 09/30/2006 10:15:16 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Absolutely positive.

I don't know what idiot website or search engine listed Tunica and Robinsonville as being Tennessee, but I wouldn't use it anymore.


67 posted on 09/30/2006 10:15:47 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Online gamblers will continue to throw away their money and won't be able to rely on existing consumer protection statues to protect them from fraud and abuse.

Well said. By banning the transacations, the gubmint makes it easier for criminal activity to flourish.

Bon appetit!

68 posted on 09/30/2006 10:16:00 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

If the President hasn't signed this yet...he shouldn't


69 posted on 09/30/2006 10:16:48 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

Probably Biblical:

Thou shalt not gambleth on thine Internet. If thou must gambleth, thou mustest do so at thinest's local Native American casino-eth.


70 posted on 09/30/2006 10:18:07 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
Pissed off indians alert.

LMAO

We need to start treating them like the rest of us.

71 posted on 09/30/2006 10:18:14 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

stupid


72 posted on 09/30/2006 10:19:12 AM PDT by samtheman (The Democrats are Instituting their own Guest Voter Program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

ping


73 posted on 09/30/2006 10:19:25 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

Isn't this the logical outcome of that WTO decision against the US for locking out foreign-based Internet gambling? IIRC, we lost and the penalty under consideration if we didn't open up to the world was some little island would get the right to ignore intellectual property rights and start cranking out CD's, DVD's, software, you name it - a huge penalty. Rather than open up to international gambling, the only other recourse was to shut it down. The loss of IP rights would be an economy killer.


74 posted on 09/30/2006 10:19:43 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
on the other hand, brick and mortar casinos create jobs. Online gambling does not.

Someone has to create those fancy websites, have encryption, and make sure the websites are hacker-proof.

Unless websites and hosting are created by a magic wand, there has to be somebody doing it.

75 posted on 09/30/2006 10:19:50 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

[If Congress could TAX these Overseas based sights, they'd be giving them grants to ENCOURAGE the business!]

If the websites are overseas, it is very possible (if not probable) that some of these sites are funding terrorism and the like. Fueling an underground organized crime black market economy through anonymous gambling websites seems a little stupid. Perhaps this is the impetus for the legislation.


76 posted on 09/30/2006 10:20:50 AM PDT by khnyny (God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

It is to bad congress doesn't protect our manufacturing industries like they are protecting our home grown gambling industry.


77 posted on 09/30/2006 10:21:40 AM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I could get half a dozen guys to run a website. A casino hotel employs hundreds.


78 posted on 09/30/2006 10:21:41 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

"websites that are preying on the most vulnerable members of our society" you are of course totally off-base. poker websites dont prey on people, weak people who cant control themselves lose money to poker websites. and why you joined today to post about this I'll never care, but republicans are supremely retarded for backing this.


79 posted on 09/30/2006 10:23:29 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
NANNY STATE PING

How or where I spend my money is NOT anyone's business but mine.

BTW, I rarely gamble and have nevr done so online........

But this has nothing to do with "the religious right" it is protecting state lotteries and brick and mortar gambling establishments which have been losing money to online gaming interests.

These is just legalized government protection of monopoly corporations, no different than what has happened to online tobacco purchases.

I just heard this on Fox.  Fisk is the one in charge of this.  And it's the Republican's who are doing this.  I just can't believe it.  Can't trust any of those pigs.

80 posted on 09/30/2006 10:23:38 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson